GGRA.ca
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Minutes of the Special Gravenhurst council meeting Jan 10, 2011
These minutes are compiled without prejudice and are a reflection of the discussion that took place at the council meeting.
The meeting was held to deal with three items.
1.Centennial centre temporary bleacher heating
2. Reduction in Established Ice Fees
3. Stimulus Deadline extension.
Mayor Donaldson also requested a new item.
There were three reports.
This report was requested in order to deal with the fact that the Muskoka Shield games have experienced a much lower attendance than they have in past seasons even though the team is tied for first place in their league. There have been numerous complaints about the inability to keep warm at the games. The Shield has 5 games remaining in their regular season and the remainder of the games will be playoffs.
The consensus of council was to reject any funding increase to provide supplementary heating in the Arena. (moved by Donoghue, seconded by Colhoun)
Gord Carey was in attendance at the meeting and concurred with this decision given the number of games remaining in the schedule.
Coucillor Colhoun was the first to speak to the recommendation. He thanked staff for their hard work and acknowledged that given the very substandard conditions that exist, it would probably have been wiser for the previous council to close the facility for the year, than to try and operate as is. He stated that the Muskoka shield has been hardest hit as they depend on the gate for operating costs. His recommendation was to reduce fees by 25% to recognize the hardships the Muskoka Sheild has endured. Councillor Cairns supported this motion.
There was a long discussion after the proposal that ranged from discussing wether the Sheild is a for profit organization, comparative fees with other teams in the league, philosophy of membership on the Sheild and what does Town support for the Sheild look like.
Councillor Bratty raised the issue that the taxpayer has already spent 150,000 to keep the arena open.
Councillor Watson said the Shield was most seriously affected and inquired about the possibility of revenue sharing next year to make up for the rebate this year. Treasurer Watson indicated this is not possible as a formal agreement.
Councillor King offered no support and declared GMHA had been banned from using the arena by the provincial hockey association
Councillors Lorenz and Donoghue felt the reduction should go to all user groups.
Questions were raised as to whether the team would fold next year. Mr. Carey stated that was not his intention.
Statements were made to indicate the Sheild has had a reduced rate since its inception and it currently has the lowest ice fees in the league.
Councillor Watson requested a recorded vote.
Moved by councillor Lorenz and seconded by Councillor Donoghue that the staff be directed to reduce the the ice fees of all user groups from 3% to 25%.
This meant that the proposed refund for user groups moved from $ 2,425.00 to $20,200.00
The recorded vote had Councillors King, Bratty and Donoghue opposed. All others including the Mayor were in favour of the motion.
Councillor Bratty moved and Councillor Colhoun seconded that the staff be directed to complete the Stimulus Deadline Extension Application.
The complete package is available in the CAO’s office and Debbie Broderick’s office.
The Mayor advised council that Tony Clement had announced a 50-bed addition to Beaver Creek that morning. The package was $10 million. Construction would start in 2012 with completion in 2014. There was no announcement on additional staffing.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Planning Council November 23 2010
is a council meeting called for planning matters.
There were 8 applications and one shore road closure
Overall Comment
This meeting saw 3 applications in which buildings were erected or changed without permits. It is the “build first and ask for legal permissions later” practice. Is this being done out of ignorance or is it to find ways around the zoning by-law requirements? In every case the infractions were approved.
Kahshe Lake Page
Mr Page has a large property on Kahshe that includes a cranberry marsh and wetland. He is donating this heritage land to the Muskoka Heritage Trust and will retain a small piece of waterfront on which he can have a cottage. This has been going on for a while. Applications to sever the lot into the donated and retained parcels, to grant him an unopened road allowance so he can access the retained lot and other matters such as fee waivers have been before council. Now it is necessary to legalize the retained lot as the frontage is less (45.8 vs 90 metres) than that required by the Official Plan for new lots created on the waterfront. He will also have permission for a reduced setback from the wetland. Approved
Muldrew Creek Yakymchuk
The applicants enlarged a deck and built a sleeping cabin without permits. The deck is adjacent to Muldrew Creek with no setback and the rural zoning does not allow for sleeping cabins. Clairmont asked about the structures that were built without permits. Donaldson wanted to know why staff justify 0 setback. It is on a rock well above the creek. Both non-conforming items were Approved
Pine Street Loon Call subdivision
The property received draft approval for a 25 single detached home subdivision in 2008. The new owners of the property would like to revise the draft plan to include 46 dwelling units with a mix of townhouses, semis and single detached homes. There were a number of objections raised by Pine Street residents and neighbours in the surrounding area. Concerns focused on increased density, not the type of housing that is currently in the area, fear of the development becoming subsidized housing, and increased vehicular traffic. Clairmont addressed the need for more low cost housing in the town. Deferred
Kahshe lake Spears
This application is to legalize a 2 storey boathouse, built without permits, and increase the shoreline development factor and square footage and decrease the setback from the water for a deck. The lot is steep and the planning staff sees the shoreline development factor increase is justified by the necessary stairs. The boathouse was built without permission and the town does not allow 2 storey boathouses. The staff recommend against the boathouse. The deck is to be removed and rebuilt smaller with the reduced setback.
The applicant pleaded that he has a health condition that requires seating adjacent to the lake. He built a storage area for boat accessories, not a boathouse. A neighbour supported the application. There have been no negative comments or complaints. Donaldson emphasized that the issue is height not storage use. She was ignored.
Council went against the staff recommendation and approved the existing situation.
Lake Muskoka Fox
He bought a property with a boathouse built not according to the permit and with a small building on the rear of the flat roof of the boathouse. This makes it a 2 storey boathouse which is not permitted by the by-law. In addition a bathroom was added with no permits. He offered to remove the bathroom, but wants to keep the small building. Cairns and Colhoun led the charge to keep the bathroom and permoit the sed. Only Donaldson voted to remove the bathroom. Approved
Kahshe Lake Bradley
Applicant requested a permit to rebuild his dwelling on the original footprint after a fire destroyed the cottage. The new by-law would not permit that size of structure or the original proximity to the shore. Approved
Brydons Bay Road Goudie
This large piece of land at the corner of Brydons Bay Road and Birch Point Road is 2 lots with large buildings . In the past a special provision allowed for institutional, group home, use. But that has lapsed. Now they want rezoning to institutional to permit a residential care facility. a retirement home for seniors. The District wants a holding provision to specify and limit the demand on the municipal services. This was added to the staff recommendation to Approve.
Cairns presented the Communities in Bloom Award to the retiring council members.
Mr. Bradley was reimbursed his application fee for requesting to build on the previous footprint, as his application was deemed necessary only because of the new bylaw. Donaldson voted against the reimbursement Carried
Cairns and Colhoun thanked Klink
Donaldson presented a gift from a local artist to the outgoing council members.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Gravenhurst Council Notes Oct 5th, 2010 without prejudice
Adoption of Agenda: Additions, then adopted as amended.
Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest: None
Deputations: 1. Presentation to the Gravenhurst Curling Club of $30,000 from moneys raised at the Mayor's Golf
Tournament.
2. Al Reid of Ontario Power Generation (OPG). Power point presentation to tell about OPG in the
Gravenhurst area.-Produces 2/3 of Ont.'s electricity, operates in an "open market", is regulated
by the Ont. Energy Board, is building new supplies in Ont., is continuing to refurbish Nuclear
Plants, is phasing out coal systems, and their safety message everywhere is:"Stay Clear, Stay safe"
3. Carey-Anne Oke-Cook - re Citizens of Gravenhurst: Some families who have been on their land for
generations may be on land that is considered "Grandfathered" or "legally non-conforming, and
therefore would qualify for "Quick Claim Letters Patent". We have no policies in our Planning and
Building rulings for these people, and Carey-Anne's request is for staff and Council to do that.
Mayor Klinck suggested that this would be something the next council should do, and Carey-Anne
is to work with Cindy Maher re one family in particular, who needs new rulings for their property.
4. Jim Davis - re Hewitt Street Landing. Complaints have been received re parking at the Hewitt
Street Landing. Two proposals are before Council to alleviate these complaints, but would lose
parking spots. Hewitt St. families have water access only and need to preserve their parking. Jim
presented a proposal, and asked that Council defer passing the proposed bylaw (on Council's
agenda later in evening), until staff have a chance to check out this proposal and make a report.
5. Mr. R. Filzmaier, was asking about the status of his piece of land, out by the airport, that is being
transferred back to him. Mayor Klinck said it's in the hands of the lawyers.
New Business
Community Services Committee:
Presented minutes of Communities in Bloom - Aug.26.2010. Sandy informed that Gravenhurst
was in the top 3 for a special award. Also mentioned there is a "fall cleanup" for the first time. If
interested, meet on Oct. 7th, 10:00 am, in front of the old town offices.
Public Works Committee:
1. Staff suggested that Jim Davis's deputation proposal would cause boat problems, and thought the
proposed bylaw should go ahead. After some discussion, Sandy Cairns moved for DEFERRAL,
T. Pilger was the second, and it WAS DEFERRED.
2. Municipal Parking lots-5 Pineridge Gate: Recommendation to amend parking bylaw 2006-50 to
allow more short term parking at the main entrance and prohibit unauthorized vehicles from
parking in designated spaces for fire fighters and municipal vehicles. Would also exempt Health
Unit vehicles. Mayor Klinck recommended that the amendment designate 2 spots for the Health
Unit. Resolution to pass recommendation to bylaw was CARRIED
3. Private Property Fire Route - Muskoka Beechgrove Public School: Resolution to accept
recommendation to designate the school's new fire route under town's Private Property Fire Route
Bylaw # 86-121. Resolution CARRIED
4. Fees & Services Charges By-law amendment: This introduces a new 5 year lease plan for boat
slips, and also new fees for damage deposits for events, etc. and these changes to be put into
a new bylaw. Mayor Klinck questioned the damage deposits because Town already has
insurance, but was informed by staff that THESE deposits are for smaller damages, ie fence
posts, events field, etc. Other municipalities were checked & they DO have this same procedure.
Bylaw was passed at later council meeting.
Development Services Committee:
1. Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) 2005-5 year review & request for comments - Recommendation to
send letter written by John Klinck - Some points of letter were: PPS not appropriate for areas with
small or modest growth. The PPS has strong emphasis on urban intensification, but no funding to
reconstruct aging infrastructure. PPS policies should apply to their own departments...ie..the
construction of a municipal road was refused by the MNR because it traversed environmentally fragile
areas, yet the MTO is contemplating a 6 lane hwy (11) over the same type area. Council of T. of
Gravenhurst believes this town is part of Northern Ont. and should be considered as such for funding
purposes. The T. of Gravenhurst strongly opposes any new highway 11 alignment that would
bypass the Town. (for full letter, go to Town Website) Resolution to send letter CARRIED.
2. Granite Trail Phase 2 Relocation of Leo's Trail. - Discussion - Developer will pay all costs. This
approval is in concept only so the developer can acquire cost estimates for site plan proposal. Does
NOT need MOE's approval to move trail. Possible "speed ruts" could be discussed for site plan.
Traffic study has been done, but any additional problems would be addressed in site plan proposal.
New trail should be made visible to public. The "Leo Kids" that helped put the original trail in, should
be notified and asked if they wanted to have a part in moving the trail. Resolution to approve
relocation CARRIED
3. Appeal to Minor Variance App.# A/46/2008/GR - Patricia Lougheed - The OMB hearing will resume,
but Town will have to recruit new lawyer. Municipality will most likely be paying fees.
4. SRC 05-2010 - Riley, Walter & Margaret (Morrison Lake)-Resolution to declare lands surplus for
closing of shore road allowance - CARRIED
5. Request to refund Municipal fees for Consent Applications. Ron Post. His first applications were
confused re the voting, so had to be reapplied for. The new applications were voted on a 2nd time,
and fees paid, but should not have had to pay twice. Resolution to waive 2nd fees was CARRIED.
6. Minutes of Municipal Heritage Committee - Aug. 10,2010. Approved.
Economic Development Committee:
1. Contract with Consulting Group for the Development of Marketing Plan, Material Design & Web
Development: We need marketing plan! RFP's were sent out resulting in contract with McSweeney
& Assoc.- cost=$62, 725.00. Budget was $65,000. Resolution to approve-CARRIED
2. Economic Development Activity Report: Staff report was submitted. RFP's are to be sent out for
companies to submit Transit Study costs, and RFP's to be sent out for bids to operate a Visitor
Info. Centre for Gravenhurst. These RFP's will serve to develop a budget for the E.D.O. 2011 budget.
3. Develop Response to MTO re proposed realignment of Highway 11. It is noted that MTO will
postpone response time until Jan., 2011,, with MTO attending Council meeting on Dec. 21, 2010.
Mayor Klinck says they are listening to us, & have good intentions. He feels we don't need to pass
any resolution now, but we should get our info. together & write an informed letter stating our opinion
within their extended timelines. Jim Davis spoke about his committee having various meetings and
that we should pass a resolution now, allowing us let them know our feelings sooner than later.
Mayor Klinck was convinced by Jim's words and a Resolution to respond was CARRIED!
4. Draft Strategic Plan: Action Plan was updated. No action.
5. Core Broadband: - High speed coverage in Gravenhurst is less than 65%. We should have better
than that. District needs a letter from the town that the Town of Gravenhurst has no objections to
aerials on water tower. Lou did not think they should be allowed. Bob says if we we don't expand,
we will be way behind other areas. We should look at where towers could be located. Mark says
any opportunity to expand is a positive. Resolution to direct staff to prepare statement for District of
Muskoka, CARRIED. Lou opposed.
Corporate Services Committee:
1. Request to waive fees - Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit re Flu Clinic & prenatal classes: Much
discussion! Paisley said we need more information re prenatal classes. We CAN use council
chambers for flu shot clinic.
2. Strategic Pan 2006 - 2010: There was an action Plan update.
Council Meeting:
The bylaws below were CARRIED
- To regulate & Prohibit parking on Municpal Lots (Pineridge Gate)
- To amend bylaw 86-121 to prohibit motor vehicle parking on private roads designated as fire
routes (Beechgrove School)
- To deem part of registered Plan NOT to be registered. (Ferguson, Kenneth W, & Linda Marie)
- To appoint law firm of Russell, Christie, LLP as Solicitor for T. of Gravenhurst, re OMB hearing
(for P. Loughead...minor variance appl. # A/46/2008/GR)
- To amend Bylaw # 2010-60 & the Schedule of Dept. User Fees & Service Charges.
Deferred: - Hewitt Street parking amendment.
Closed Session for Acquisition/disposition of land.
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents' Association
Gravenhurst Council Notes Septmber 28, 2010 without prejudice
Overall Comment: the significant item at this meeting is the general amendment for non-complying residential waterfront dwellings which is an OMB matter. See the last item.
Applications:
Riley Lake, Deerfly Drive Post
This property had a mix of open space and residential zoning and is on a narrow bay. The application to sever 2 lots required the OS zoning to be removed from one of the lots and an aquatic impact and site evaluation study. It was opposed by neighbours and the public as a large area as the remaining area at the end of the bay could potentially in future be claimed as a lot. This was not addressed but the CofA approved the severance. The implementing by-law was approvedComment: the by-law and zoning still leaves the “lot” at the end of the bay in question. Why?
Kahshe Lake Travis
They applied for reduced setback to build on this vacant lot arguing that there is no alternative site for a building. The planning staff agreed, the neighbours did not. The new building will be at 15 metres and will conform in size to the new zoning by-law amendment for non-conforming properties (see below) approved
Ryde, Merkley Road Gravenhurst and District Conservation Club
The club bought this old farm lot with wetlands this past spring. They want to build a firing range that meets the standards of the Chief Firearms Office. The neighbours came out in force and presented a petition. They objected to: proximity to houses, increased traffic on Merkley Rd, impact on wild life and most vocally noise. They want it rejected. The use is consistent with the OP. The item took almost 2 hours.
Discussion; BPilger asked the applicant if he would be happy with a firing range near his home. He responded that he lives near 2 ranges. Pilger opposes this location
T.Pilger did town authorize the culvert that was replaced by the applicant? Concerned if the range becomes commercial. Asked if an environmental assessment is required. The area in question is an old farm and is already cleared and is not a heritage area.
Colhoun posited that the club members could use the land for target shooting without permit or rezoning. Aapplicant wants a proper safe legal firing range. What types of guns will be used hunting guns and perhaps small arms by OPP officers
Cairns supported Colhoun’s observation and asked that the snowmobile trail route be clarified
Clairmont will there be winter use? No
Donaldson what is different here than there previous place on Jones Road? The Jones road property was small and limited in space and houses were encroaching on the range. Also they wanted to move as it was becoming expensive to operate there. defeated
Kahshe lake Bell
A recently constructed sleeping cabin will be legalized at 21.3 metres rather than the 30 required. approved
Gull lake Smelko
They are building a new cottage and adding to their sleeping cabin. They requested reduced setbacks, citing site constraints. Staff agreed. The new cottage will be at 23 metres, the decks at 20 and the sleeping cabin at 3.6 metres from the creek on the side of the property.
Discussion; BPilger would site alteration be required to be back 30 metres? Yes blasting and more vegetation removal.
Guerriero concerned about the Bunkie being too close to the creek. Creek is small and 12 foot setback is sufficient
Cairns where is the septic? A new septic will be required. Owner does not want a deptic. He will use a composting toilet and leaching pit. approved
Ryde, Merkley Road Pierobon
He wants to sever his 4.5 hectare lot creating one new lot. Both will be zoned rural residential. approved
Wharf Como Property Ltd
They want approval to open a luxury pet resort in the old condominium sales office at the corner of 169 and Steamship Bay Rd. There will be no outdoor facilities for the pets (runs or enclosures), which was the primary concern of the neighbours. This restriction is in the lease. approved
Lake Muskoka Zvan-Watson
She wants to demolish shed and sleeping cabins and replace with a 2 storey garage with sleeping accommodations upstairs. It will be in the rear yard across the road from the cottage. A new septic has been installed for the icnresed capacity. approved
3 shore road closures were approved
Zoning by-law amendment
The staff brought forward a resolution that the town send the revised wording of one section of the by-law to the OMB to resolve the appeals of 2 lake associations. This follows 4 months of preparations and negotiations by the representatives of council, mayor and development services chair and vice-chair, and the appellants. Objections were heard as follows: questions about the degree to which the associations who support this negotiated settlement represent their members, this does not improve water quality, this makes Gravenhurst the most restrictive in Muskoka, varying lot frontages are not being taken into account and the height restriction is inappropriate. One person also objects to government interference in property rights.
Discussion:
Donaldson asked the chief planner if this proposal is the most restrictive. In my opinion this is not the most restrictive. During the planning we looked at other Muskoka by-laws and even outside of Muskoka to Seguin.
She then told the council members that they have spent a lot of time on this item and it would be unfair to not decide the matter. The intent is to discourage development away from the water and that previous councils have for 40 years pushed development back from the water. This is to protect the town’s most valuable asset, its lake and environments. This is a good starting point. We need some restrictions.
BPilger. This is not perfect but it represents a compromise by both sides.
Guerriero this is an OMB process. It is a mediation document to go to the OMB. The OMB will decide. It is amendable a year from now if we see it does not wrok. Implementation will be key.
Cairns a lot of work has gone into this. As others have requested involvement we need more public engagement, more consideration is needed. she moved deferral.
Re the deferral Guerriero argued it is time to act.
Cairns inquired as to how many public meetings have been held 3 open houses, 3 meeting plus one 10 days ago solely on this amendment.
T.Pilger who is involved if it is deferred
B.Pilger we are elected to make decisions
Clairmont the OMB will ask if we gave an opportunity for reconsideration The legal advice to the town was to have a public meeting. That has been done 10 days ago. Only Clairmont and T.Pilger voted for the deferral denied
Discussion: Donaldson our choice is to defeat this and go back to 1994 by-law terms or to support the negotiating team and tell the OMB this is OK
T.Pilger questioned the 94 reference and the planner confirmed that the terms would be per that by-law.
Colhoun asked if the opponents can go to the OMB. Yes they can ask to be a party and present their case at their own expense.
The vote was recorded. Unanimous for the recommendation to notify the OMB of the town adoption of the negotiated agreement.
Comment: A concerted campaign of misinformation attempted to put considerable pressure on the councillors. Their scare tactic was an unproven charge that this will destroy property values and prevent any change to existing cottages. The drivers of this campaign seem to be members of the real estate industry. The change when implemented will require them to do more work for the buyers of property if there is an intention to buy and remodel an older cottage. Is this bad?
The amendment will help protect the water quality of the lakes by lessening vegetation removal in the front 20 metres when a non-conforming building is enlarged. The proposal keeps all existing property rights and allows for reasonable expansion of existing buildings. The other thing the amendment will do is help keep the traditional Muskoka character of the waterfront, which it can be argued will keep property values, as this character is what makes us unique and desirable. Good for council for seeing through the b…. that was being broadcast and for not wasting money with OMB costs.
The meeting ended at about 10:45 PM. After the outside lights went out.
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Town of Gravenhurst Council - September 9, 2010
First meeting in new council chambers
Present: Mayor Klinck , Tracy Wilson, Terry Pilger, Brian Pilger, Lou Guerriero, Mark Clairmont, Bob Calhoun, Paisley Donaldson arrived late approx. 17:15.
Additions to agenda :
- replacement of arena score board clock.(community services )
- tender for new snow plow truck(public works)
Deputations:
1) Wilf Loewen: Red Oak village – new condo development on Muskoka Beach road . Loewen request to waive securities for Phase 1 of project saying that his quotes to have work done are much higher than projected. Claimed that the TofG have done so before.
Question: for Nick Pop. From Clairemont- is site plan approved as of yet, no but has been submitted. B.Calhoun asked Loewen if he would pay fees on a pro-rated basis, Loewen responded yes once he starts selling condos.
Comments: Klinck stated that the TofG could not take the chance to do this as what if something occurred with sewers etc. the tofg would not have security. Not a good idea, leaving town open to be responsible if something went wrong. Vote: in second half of meeting, recommending that site plan agreement be accepted but that their not be a waiving of fees.
Guerriero and Klinck commented that we have an obligation to protect the whole neighbourhood can’t support. – CARRIED –
2) Rob McPhee: Muskoka Community network activities up-date. Spoke to broadband penetration in . only up to 80% in Gravenhurst area, because so spread out. MCN will be having a grand opening soon. Contact Muskoka Community Network for more info.
NEW BUSINESS:
Community Services Committee:
1) Trails information up-date by Kyla Bruce : New Website: WWW.muskokatrailscouncil.com K. Bruce spoke to new signage, Map clips that have maps of trails and clips to belt; available at Muskoka retailers $5.00. Also announced they received funding from Trans Canada Trails Ontario; trans Canada trail ont. Is working on an up-dated trails master plan. Also mentioned launch of trail passport, and feature trail behind info. Center on Hwy. #11. 33 KM of trails in Gravenhurst.
-Real purpose of presentation was to get council to sanction standard contract tofg has with property owners effected, as some property had changed hands. – CARRIED –
2)Gravenhurst Centennial Centre Eat Smart Recreation Policy: Deb Brodrick gave a presentation re: what kind of items will be sold, good choices of healthy foods. Resolution: that community services committee approve the Gravenhurst Centennial Centre Eat Smart Policy and an Eat Smart Recreation Committee be established to support the eat smart program. – CARRIED –
COMMENTS: Guerriero wants the smoke free standard increased to be further away from entrances. Wants at least to be 20 meters , no mention of it in resolution. Pilger T. wanted to make sure that French fries were still made available. Clairmont commented that drinking fountains be made available rather than use all kinds of bottles. Guerrriero stated they have been proven to be dirty and carry germs etc.
4) Contract for CS & P Architects: ones working on Centennial center: D.Brodrick spoke to the contract with the Architects. “The architect is responsible for the coordination,services and fee for the following consultants; structural engineer, mechanical engineer, electrical engineer, landscape architect, code/life safety, pool consultant, food service consultant and acoustics consultant. The TofG engages and pays for the civil consultant and the commissioning agent; however the architect coordinates all services of these consultants. All parties have come to a final agreement with the working in all documentation . The contract was made available . (have copy)
Comments: T. Pilger asked why this contract is only being addressed now given the project has been going on. Answer from D. Brodrick was that because lawyers etc. have taken awhile. Contract says Construction budget 16 million (estimate). Resolution read 3 times by the Mayor, - carried - Bill # 143.
5) Minutes of the communities in bloom.
6) Replacement of Arena Score board clock – supposedly pieces from old one can not be found from when all was packed up. No paperwork really provided . D.Brodrick stated no luck in trying to obtain a 2nd hand one. COST basic clock with wireless control $12,500 D. Brodrick said that it should come out of the operating budget. She is going to confirm cost and get back to council. Clairmont commented that $12,500 seems pretty reasonable, claims to know cost as Rotary replaced one at high school. T.Pilger asked if there was space on clock for advertisers for on-going revenue – Yes. However resolution carried even-though the tofg notes say D. Brodrick to confirm cost. Resolution put forward by T.Pilger and T.Wilson.
Public Works Committee:
1) amend pking. Control by-law: area Revell St. @ Musquash rd. (regulate and prohibit pking. On Municipal hwys. J. Wooters made presentation. – Carried – Bill # 144
2) Muskoka Wharf boat slip license: already passed by Wharf Board. TofG rubber stamped. There were no questions asked – Carried.
3) Renewal of agreement with Vision Outdoor Advertising :re: the sign at the information center on Hwy.#11. Financial: Vision Outdoor Advertising has agreed to a 1% increase per yr. or 5% for the term of agreement. This will increase the monthly installment by $635.00 +HST from $605.00 and the annual payment to $7,620.00 plus HST from $7,260.00. – Carried – T. Pilger asked if we didn’t redesign how long would we expect to last – 2015. Calhoun commented how it was worth it.
4) change to operational requirements for roadway ice grading, all related to new snow removal truck purchased by tofg. In future a back hoe will follow ploughs getting rid of all the huge chunks of ice. Will not be needed all time.
6) cost of new truck $95,617.84, it was budgeted for $110,000. came in $14,000 under. was in the 2010 budget.
5) Waiving of fees for Pine ridge home owners assoc. to have a h20 line installed , there is a garden there that has won communities in bloom awards. T.Pilger asked if waiving of fees meant a waiving of liabilities for TofG. No. – Carried –
Development Services Committee: P. Donaldson arrived.
1) and 2) had to do with shore rd. allowances and purchase by owner a portion of original shore rd. allowance and need to declare lands surplus in order for this to occur.
3) Request by Keala McAuley – Lantern Marina Trailer park. Situation is that K. McAuley paid for and had Town approval bldg. permit etc. to build sun room on to trailer. This was accomplished. Then park was sold and now there does not seem to be a grandfather clause for her new sunroom and the new owners don’t want them. So she is petitioning the town to pay back the money she submitted for building permit. Lots of discussion but really silly, not tofg’s fault that park sold. Request denied. Comments from some councilors about how they feel sorry for her. Etc.
5)
Heritage
designation of wheelhouses of RMS Cherokee and The Islander. Pretty straight
forward, Mary Storey (Heritage boat center) present and although she was not
down for a deputation Paisley Donaldson asked her for comments.
Council then discussed for 1/2 hour amongst THEMSELVES, something that was
straight so forward. – Carried –
6) Southwood Church Net-Net lease agreement: again no deputation noted in council minutes but again comments were requested from Friend of the Church of our lady Southwood. History: TofG had been looking in past 8 yrs. To have it demolished. However Municipal Heritage Committee conducted a site visit in fall of 2009 and later passed a resolution requesting that Southwood Church be preserved. The net-net lease agreement is that TofG will only maintain grounds and friends of Southwood church have to pay for all repairs, maintenance etc. Lease fee of $1.00 to be paid by Mayor Klinck and he of course noted he would also pay the HST involved.
Economic Development committee: discussion was focused around the Hwy#11 realignment. Notice of public meetings and meetings with business owners on Hwy.#11.
Corporate Services Committee: Proposal for a coffee Kiosk in the new building. Directed to investigate/discuss further with Cottage Country Family Health as the Kiosk would be on their wall in hall way.
Closed session after council mtg. to discuss the Community Spirit awards.
Also announcement of Special Council Mtg. Sept. 18, 2010 , to obtain public comments and consider a proposed amendment to the TofG’s new comprehensive zoning by law. Being by-law 10-04.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Gravenhurst Council Notes August 24, 2010 without prejudice
This meeting is called the planning council because the matters being considered are planning matters. The meeting had 7 applications for rezoning. plus one carryover. One application was postponed
Comment; 4 of the applications were routine. 3, for Wicks and Travis and the Revel street semis were not routine and involved major variations to the OP and zoning by-law. These three also involved illegal building and use issues. Council showed no teeth in dealing with illegal building and uses thereby encouraging others to continue this pattern. “Don’t ask permission, just do it and apologize later”.
Routine applications
Gull Lake Thomson
The was heard previously and there was an objection from the neighbour. It was deferred to allow for the 2 parties to meet and perhaps revise the plans to address the objection. They want to add to their house and the first application would have had the addition too close to a driveway with an easement. By talking this was resolved and the new addition will be slightly smaller. Approved
Comment; what a good idea to have the parties solve the problem with the aid of staff. Saves trouble in future.
Severn River Jescan Power
They want to build a garage, deck and screened porch in a flood zone. They will design accordingly. They also want reduced side yard setbacks. Approved
Severn Bridge Norm and Roy Investments
Want to legalize the 5 dwelling units, apartments, on this property. They have 4 legally now. MTO wants it tabled until highway 11 redevelopment plan is settled. A neighbour objected. Approved
Morrison Lake Rolling
The undersized lot is legalized. Reduced side yard setbacks were Approved
Controversial applications or applications involving major change
North Muldrew Lake Road Wicks
The property is across the road from the Muskoka Bay subdivision and golf course. He has for 2 years illegally used it as a contractors yard, filling in a wetland to so do. The property is designated as residential and zoned R1 and is in the urban area. He now wants his illegal use recognized. The neighbours strongly objected.
Questions and comments:
B.Pilger has Mr Wicks got heavy equipment? yes
T.Pilger is the proposed use industrial or commercial? It is not commercial it is light industrial
Guerriero was the OP mapping in place when the wetland was filled. Not answered
Clairmont where is the urban boundary? property is in the urban area
Wilson does the runoff go into the wetlands not answered
Planner initially recommended approval, but then recommended deferral so as to restrict the change of use.
Later at the by-law stage the discussion was as follows
Klinck moved deferral
Donaldson what was the use declared at the time permission for the workshop building was requested. It was for a home occupation . He did not declare the contractors yard use. Was Mr Wicks in the contracting business at the time? yes
Guerriero does not support deferral. It is the wrong use for the neighbourhood.
Wilson we could ask for a storm water management report and defer for that report.
T.Pilger this is not the right zoning. It is not compatible with the neighbourhood
Clairmont if we turn this down where does this leave the applicant? We will need to investigate.
B.Pilger we should be fair to Mr Wicks
Cairns if we refuse where will he locate his equipment?
The vote: against deferral Donaldson, Guerriero and T.Pilger. For deferral the other 6 Deferred
Comment: deferral means that the application can come back with no requirement for a public meeting. A change of zoning permission goes with the land forever. It cannot be changed back without landowner consent. Wicks can sell this property to another contractor or heavy equipment operator and the site can continue to be used. The property is located in the middle of a residential neighbourhood and this use is not compatible. Even the planner described it as industrial. Councillors did not fully deal with the issue of illegal practices by the landowner. To sanction rezoning is to sanction illegal behaviour.
Kahshe lake Travis
They own a vacant lot on Kahshe Lake and want to build a new cottage 15 metres from the water. The OP and zoning by-law require 30 metres. The reason given for this request is that there is not another suitable site for the house. The neighbours objects to the request and stated that there are alternative sites for building that respect the setbacks. The KLRA says the lot is steep but moving hydro wires opens up other options for siting. They want at minimum a limit on the width of the building. The staff indicated there are not many options for siting and recommend approval. During the questions to the applicant it came out that the building can be further set back, but the owner wants to be able to see her young children form inside the cottage when they are down at the beach.
Discussion
Clairmont wanted to know if blasting is an option for increased setback
B.Pilger how deep is the lot
T.Pilger will the hydro line have to be moved? Yes for any building
Clairmont we loose sight of the intent of the by-law if the setback can be improve
Guerriero can we put a restriction in the by-law. Is the planner sure that there is no alternative site.
Donaldson wanted to know how to handle the KLRA proposal re size.
Guerriero proposed that it be deferred to negotiate building size. Deferred
Comment: no one probed the neighbours assertion that there are alternative sites. Why?
West Gravenhurst, Revel & Musquash Streets
The corner property was approved to have 4 semi detached houses built. Apparently the semi detached houses have changed into duplex rental apartments, therefore doubling the housing on the site. To do this they need reduced frontage and lot sizes approved and the number of required parking spaces reduced. The neighbours are strongly opposed. They cited many issues: noise, storm water runoff, parking on the street which is narrow, safety for the school buses, lack of outdoor space for tenants, plus the buildings are not legal duplexes. The staff recommend refusal. .Denied
Comment; how did illegal duplexes get passed in new buildings? The second kitchens and separate entrances must have been evident at building department inspections. Why weren’t they caught?
Kahshe lake Erin island Strenzel Gibson
This property had decks and stairs and sleeping and storage buildings built without permits and with many zoning infractions of setbacks. Negotiations have been ongoing for a while and are now settled. A minor reduction in the deck and stairs resulted. Approved
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Gravenhurst Council Notes August 17, 2010 without prejudice
Overall Comment:
Half an hour worth of business took 2 and a half hours.
Deputations
Ontario winter Games. The final report was presented to council, good attendance and a 160 thousand dollar surplus.
Fine films the 09-10 series was a success, average attendance was 80-90 per film. They are requesting a continuation of the present arrangement – use of the Opera House with no fee, and 50% of any surplus goes to the OP. The manager of the Opera House is proposing they have the fee waiver and share any surplus, but that they also agree to use the ticketing system at an extra charge of $4.75 per ticket. At present there is no ticketing through the opera house system. It is cash at the door or in advance.
Discussion: B.Pilger, what is attendance 15 to 183 people
Colhoun what will this cost the town $3,000
Clairmont and Wilson, leave arrangement as is
Klinck where does the arrangement re use of the ticketing system stand. It almost doubles the price.
Colhoun the ticketing fee just adds costs and could decrease attendance.
Council approved fee waiver and leaving arrangement as is.
Ryde Community Co-op made a donation to the town and gave thanks for the new water system
Sandy Thompson – wants permission to establish a coffee kiosk in the corridor of the new town hall. Will serve coffee, tea, water and snacks.
Committee Business
Riley Lake dredging. Requesting approval to go to tender for work after September 15 if funds are available.
Centennial Centre Expansion Temporary change rooms and washrooms are located in trailers. Users need showers also. A new trailer and decking will be brought in, estimated cost $10 thousand. Will take from the contingency funds.
Discussion
Wilson are users happy with the new shower units
Clairmont, why the delay in approvals, are showers connected to the dressing rooms
Klinck how will players get from dressing room to showers
An increase in taxi fares was approved. The taxi company owner indicated increased costs for insurance and minimum wages. Approved
Economic Development visitor statistics were presented
The drinking water treatment systems at Ryde Co-op and at firestations 2 and 3 are installed and are being tested.
Committee minutes tabled
Wharf Board the mayor raised the question as to costs for highway 11 sign and its value. Not answered.
BIA and Economic Development Committees
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Gravenhurst Council Notes August 18, 2010
Committee of Adjustment
The committee of Adjustment hears applications for consent and minor variances.
7 applications were heard
Muskoka Road North Lee
He has a lot with a semi-detached dwelling. He wants to sever the lot and build another semi on that lot. Approved
Pine Lake Burns and Rochwerg
This vacant lot is to be divided and each half attached to the neighbopurs giving one less lot and larger frontages. Approved
Riley Lake Mills
They want approval to increase the shoreline development area by 30% and to decrease the setback from the water by 2 metres. Approved
Lake Muskoka Horosko
They want to expand their shoreline development with new and enlarged docks. The development will exceed the 25% limit. Approved
Public input raised the importance of keeping the dock one metre out from shore. As it is a pole dock the shoreline habitat will be kept.
Lake Muskoka Austin
They are demolishing their cottage and building a much larger one and hence will be too close to the lot line. Lesser side lot line Approved
Muskoka Bay Strong
They are adding an addition to the rear of the cottage and want a reduced rear yard setback Approved
Lake Muskoka Clark
A back lot used for access to 2 waterfront lots is deficient in size and needs recognition. Approved
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed go give contest and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the Town. To see background papers go to the T of G website.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Gravenhurst Council Notes July 20, 2010 without prejudice
Overall Comment: 2 significant items well worth watching: the cost overrun on the arena and new aquatic centre project and the fire department expansion to take over the 9,500 square foot old city hall. Both have budget and tax implications and reflect on political direction and management competence.
Deputations
Airport Filzmaier
At the July 6 meeting council recommended to District a 1 year extension of his 2 lot subdivision approval when he paid his fees. This meeting he asked for 2 things, he wants the property conveyed back to him that he had sold to MTO for $1 because MTO thought they would need the access for building the new road to Prisons. Approved by Council. He is also looking for an extension of his sub-division development plan (originally issued 12 yrs. ago) Wanted a 2 yrs. extension and no fees. District has already indicated they would not extend more than 4 months. Council decided it was a district matter.
Muskoka Wharf Adventures
The operator of the water ski and wake board school at the Wharf wants to expand to Gull Lake park docks. He notes that the park has many swimmers and he sees this as a market for his school.
Council responses were mixed: Cairns, Guerriero, Colhoun and Clairmont led the cheerleading for the idea. BPilger, TPilger and Klinck asked substantive questions – hours of operation, base location, timing. Mayor Klinck strongly suggested that MWA not commence business in Gull Lake w/o consultation with D. Brodrick and Gull and Silver Lake Assoc. and that council would deal with issue in August meeting if follow through addressed.
Centennial Centre expansion and new aquatic centre.
Guerriero as chair of the committee for this project gave a long discursive background before getting to the issue at hand: the costs are exceeding the budget. They have changed the design, because of site problems and have additional components to the plan and an increased contingency. The net effect is 3.5 million dollars in more borrowing. The unforeseeable costs were blamed on water table issues, storm management, and sewers, regulations of Building and fire code requirements and complexity of connecting to existing building. All this was justified by the short timelines to prepare the grant request and discovery of the location of the storm sewer discharge and the high water table on the site.
Council remarks: Klinck asked about the timeline for completion – on schedule, that total additional needs are covered –other issues have been anticipated and the 500 thousand contingency should be enough, whether components could be dropped the YMCA has flexibility but town would loose significant program space and services to young families, and also indicated that he has talked informally with the senior levels and they are receptive but non-committal in their reaction.
TPilger: how did we miss the high water table, the capacity of District sewers and the storm water discharge issues. These excellent questions were answered with the excuse that initial cost estimates were rushed and no professional team was in place at the time of application.
Colhoun opined that the project was rushed and work accelerated. Other levels don’t take this into account
Clairmont sees this as a catalyst for the community and he “would be prepared to double the (shortfall) borrowing” and then use the extra money so the next council has some funds available. He then blamed the senior levels for their short deadlines. “Keep up the good work” He also asked what this means to the taxes. This will mean a 21/2 to 3% increase in taxes.
Guerriero praised the architect and construction management firms.
Council approved going to the District to debenture the 3.5 million and also asking the senior levels of government to give some more money.
Comment: the engineers who helped with the initial cost estimate were on site well before this project with an arena expansion project plan. At that time they could not have failed to identify the structural deficiencies in the arena, assuming they were thorough. Common sense would tell all of us that a 35 year old building no longer meets code standards. Wasn’t this planned for? And the District infrastructure is well mapped.
It is not sufficient to blame senior levels of government. They gave the full 2/3 of what the town submitted. The responsibility is with the town staff and the consultants in 2009.
This raises the debt for the town to 30 million dollars. To borrow and pay interest and principle on a million dollars causes approx a 1% tax increase, depending on the interest rate. Together the arena/pool and new town hall projects have just added 16.6 million dollars to the town debt, 16% increase in tax rate. “keep up the good work”
Communities in Bloom provided an update.
The Volunteer awards program will have a new name “Community Spirit Awards” and committee. Clairmont asked if seasonal residents are eligible. Yes
Pinetree Road bridge is being replaced this week.
Highway 11 Camp Hillbilly
A site plan agreement will be put into place.
Audited Financial statement 2009
The auditors presented the audited financial statement for 2009. The format is changed because the province has forced the municipalities to value their assets and give statements in a format similar to that which a private corporation would use. .
Questions arose as to the method for valuing the assets go back to costs and allow for depreciation. Klinck used this item to congratulate the council on operating on a business basis and on an increase in assessment from 2000 to 2010 and then postulated that all property owners have more net worth as a result of this increase!
Comment: Much congratulatory patting of backs was seen as ratios of debt to equity and net financial position are low and the accumulated surplus is high. But these result from accounting changes not real changes. No one asked how meaningful these ratios and figures are in the context of a government institution. No one asked questions about the real financial health of the town The 2009 statement requires a sophisticated review. We will ask a board member to review and comment and give context in the next timeframe.
Harvie Street Building
The deputy Fire Chief tabled a plan for the old city hall. The space will be shared by the OPP, community policing office, and the fire department. The Police will have for their use the current committee room and the councillors’ office. The kitchen and washrooms and training room will be shared space. The current council chamber will become the training room. The rest of the space is for the Fire department – all 4 staff. This is in effect the space of the 2 storey portion of the building, approx. 4,000+ square feet. The plans shown were the building outline with typed in labels such as “winter or indoor training area”, “future washroom showers” etc. Drawings were not signed, stamped or qualified in any way. The District pays the town 8,300 for rental for the OPP. Of course this now le aves the current police office vacant.
The resolution to approve the plan and have an agreement with the OPP was approved with no votes against.
Comment: this reporter found the situation disgraceful, no questions were asked as to what the operating costs will be nor did they ask about renovation costs, nor why 4 staff need the space now occupied by 15 or more staff and reception plus the upstairs space. It is decision irresponsibility made evident. There was no discussion from councillors as to whether the proposed layout and expectations met bldg. codes or if it had been inspected regarding proposals. The absence of questions raises 2 questions: whether the councillors met beforehand to see the plans, this contravenes the requirement for public discussion, or else they are negligent in protecting the taxpayers.
A brush and forest fire fighting agreement will be entered into with MNR.
2d quarter financial reports were tabled for all departments. No questions.
Committee reports – Communities in Bloom and the arena/pool decision committee
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Gravenhurst Council Notes July 6, 2010 without prejudice
Overall Comment: a short and uneventful meeting. The most interesting items; additional renovation cost for energy efficient lighting in new town offices.
Kyla Bruce of community services received a certificate and praise from Council.
July 30 and 31st the Roots Amateur Wakeboard Tour will be held on Gull Lake. There will be a wakeboard clinic and competitions for youth. They have a noise exemption.
4 new handicapped spaces will be implemented.
Kahshe Lake an OSRA and unopened road allowance will be closed and sold to the adjacent landowner., Norman Page, who donated a waterfront cranberry marsh to the Muskoka heritage Trust.
Airport an industrial subdivision adjacent to the airport will receive a 12 month extension to the original draft approval of 1992. The fee is to be paid.
TPilger asked whether in the past 18 years requirements for such a subdivision have changed. Yes, environmental screening and hydrogeological studies would now be required.
Clairmont asked what happens in 12 months? And what happens if he meets the conditions of the draft approval. He reapplies and if he meets the conditions he can go ahead.
Visitor information statistics for June were tabled. Good response and people like the maps.
A new citizen member of the Highway 11 Committee was appointed. Brian Otis.
Kilworthy Fire station – the well has now been tested and has very low salt levels. (Remember this past winter the replacement fire truck was approved as the old one rusted out before the end of its scheduled life. At that time the saltiness of the well, no testing, was blamed.)
Colhoun wondered if the premature rusting of the fire truck was because of poor design or poor maintenance. He also mentioned that the water is not potable so the station cannot be used as an election polling station.
The mayor asked staff to obtain a risk assessment from Public Health re the water potability.
New town offices. The renovation continues and Council approved an additional $21,000 for a retrofit to the lighting system for greater efficiency. The estimated payback is 18 months.
TPilger is this in addition to the current approved 1.9 million? Yes
Clairmont – clarify the payback. Range 6 to 36 months, for us 18 months.
TPilger do we know the current status of the renovation costs. Not specifically, but we are on track and still within the budgeted amount.
Comment: energy efficiency was not part of the specs for the renovation, so this is an additional cost. But given the payback it is worth doing. In 2010 how can the concept of energy efficiency be ignored in specs?
Ryde C-op
The Public Health unit has done a risk assessment on the water for the building and it is unsafe. Right now the co-op users supply potable water for consumption and the building water is only used for cleaning and toilets. This is not acceptable to the PH unit.
BPilger, people do not drink the water. Is PH aware of this. That is irrelevant since food is served.
TPilger, there is a drilled well at the adjacent fire hall. Could that water be connected? Mayor, we have no choice we should proceed. Since the buildings have different owners connection of infrastructure is problematic.
Guerriero can the proposed system handle the volume. Yes
Committee Minutes reported
The Wharf board , Environmental Advisory Committee, Accessibility Advisory Committee, Public Library board
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Gravenhurst Council Notes June 22, 2010 without prejudice
This meeting is called the planning council because the matters being considered are planning matters. The meeting had 7 applications for rezoning, and one carryover. One application was withdrawn .
Overall comment: the applications part of the meeting was public with opportunity for the public to speak. And speak they did to the Mongeau application on Muskoka Bay for 29 town houses, where a maximum of 8 is permitted. The council chamber was packed, many eloquent speeches were made and council rejected the application. Numbers count.
Overall Comment on zoning applications: the council speedily passed 6 of the 7 applications as there was minimal public comment They continue to allow people to advance their buildings towards the water within the riparian zone of 20 metres. This has a cumulative impact on lake health as this land is important for absorbing nutrients and pollution. Buildings make the problem worse by removing soil and creating storm water runoff. This is the purpose for the zoning requirements on the waterfronts.
Carryover application.
North Muldrew Lake Reilly
They are enclosing their deck and building another one in front of the cottage towards the lake. This means they reduce the setback from 17.8 metres to 13.5 metres. See my comment above re the riparian zone protection. Approved
New applications
Muskoka Bay Mongeau
This property is on North Street and fronts the bay just west of the wharf. The frontage would allow for 8 lots to be created. The applicant requested permission for 29 multiple unit dwellings. The application is a major variance to the official plan and the zoning by-law and this was pointed out by the public. The issues raised were environmental, destruction of the natural character of the site,density, traffic impacts, destruction of a peaceful family neighbourhood, impact on the water quality, character of the Bay being ruined, impact on adjacent property values. Most speakers reminded the council of the Official plan and its wording to protect the environment and character of the town. The planner recommended deferral for more studies. Colhoun moved for deferral. He was unable to get a seconder for his motion. Donaldson, Cairns, T.Pilger, Guerriero, Clairmont spoke in opposition. Denied
Bethune Drive Cooper
Application to sever his property and rezone the new lot on Simpson road to rural residential Approved
Beiers Road Thomson
Rezoning to permit the existing dwelling to be converted into a retail store. Approved
Muskoka Bay Golf course Muskoka Bay villas
Request to waive minimum lot area, frontage and coverage requirements to be able to build 4 plex units on one of the previously approved parcels alongside the golf course. Guerriero asked about the outstanding work still to be done on North Muldrew Lake road, an asphalt lift and sidewalks. Wilson wanted to know the size of the units – 800 to 1700 square feet, Clairmont sought clarity as to building type proposed and wanted to know if this would be affordable housing at these sizes. Approved
Muskoka Road South
The house at the corner of Veterans Way is now a group home which exceeds legal capacity. The owner wants to add to the rear 2d floor of the building to allow for 10 residents. Parking requirements are reduced. The trees at the front of the house have come down. The site plan will require replanting. Approved
Severn River Thom
The large frontage on the river is being severed into 6 lots. The area has species at risk and environmentally sensitive wetlands. A study has identified building envelopes. Specific areas are being rezoned EP. Approved
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Gravenhurst Council Notes June 15, 2010 without prejudice
Overall Comment: an uneventful meeting. The most interesting items were the report from the Watershed Council, the Economic Development Strategy and the costs of the debt incurred by the town for the new town hall.
Deputations
A cheque for $3,500 from Benjamin Moore was given for repainting the barge.
One Kids Place requested a fee waiver for use of the youth centre every Wednesday to provide assessments and speech therapy for young children. TPilger asked if this conflicts with other programming – no, Clairmont asked what occurs, Colhoun asked about numbers served. Approved
Nurse Practitioners want to establish a clinic for mental health care. They requested support for their application and assistance with locating space. The mayor put forward the idea of them leasing the empty space in the town owned doctors building on Muskoka Road South. They will talk further with the town staff.
Habitat for Humanity gave an overview of the organization. They want to do a build in Gravenhurst in 2011. TPilger praised H4H and Clairmont asked about rental rates. They are higher here in Muskoka than further south.
Watershed Council Report Card The 2010 report card was presented. It is available from www.muskokaheritage.org It measures the health of the physical environment of muskoka
The report card looks a how Muskoka is doing when measured against established scales: for water what %age of the lakes and Bays are over threshold, the amount of mercury, and riparian habitat (the edge of the water and 20 metres back from the shore), for land the %age of natural cover, the %age of large undisturbed forest, the %age of interior forest, and finally at the amount and size of managed and protected areas. For Gravenhurst we have some major challenges and do not rate well on the Lake Muskoka subwatershed. There is old development with too many small lots, there is loss of riparian zones and a damaging fragmentation of the watershed by roads. The presentation stressed the importance of riparian zones. TPilger asked about forest cover in Gravenhurst. Guerriero praised the councils work and asked about Muskoka Bay. He sees it as an asset and asked about its status and should we be concerned about development. The response indicated that nutrient loading is improving as the major negative stressors have been removed. But there are still storm water and other issues. Clairmont didn’t understand the established scales. Cairns feels that planning staff give good support and hopes council understands how important this is. She then gave a Communities in Bloom promo.
Comment: the report card does not rank the Muskoka Lake watershed well. We can only hope that the council listens to the message about protecting the riparian zones, not fragmenting the landscape and not approving small lots and high densities on Muskoka Bay. Also the management of storm waterneeds to ber addressed by public works and planning.
An OSRA closure on Sparrow lake was approved.
Ongoing minutae
Leases: The town approved leases for the train station operation, the taxi office at the train station, the snack bar at gull lake park operation.
Committees: The minutes of the centennial expansion centre committee, the Environmental Advisory Committee and the Heritage Advisory committee were tabled. The BIA will add 2 members at large as will the Highway 11 committee.
The policies regarding workplace violence and harassment were approved, a new stop sign for Pineridge Gate and Hedgewood Lane was approved, parking restrictions were added to 4 more areas, and Banners will be added at the wharf using the G8 money. (There is a 200 thousand dollar surplus which will go back to Ottawa).
Economic Development The EDO strategy report was tabled. 12 possible economic development items were identified. They are: development of visitor information services, response to proposed changes to Highway 11, general preparedness, creation of an ED website, tourism and ED marketing, retail attraction program, business attraction program, re-development of the façade improvement program, a centre of excellence for tourism and hospitality, china tourism marketing, development of industrial land and re-development of the Muskoka Centre property.
Discussion: Cairns praised the current website video, the idea of a retail attraction program – we need kids clothing and shoes - and the façade improvement idea.
Guerriero wants to know what is the vision behind the list. He argued that without a vision there is no direction, no meaningful way to set priorities and be proactive. Clairmont agrees with this but can a vision be developed? We are a multifaceted community and cannot predict the future. We have 50,000 square feet of empty retail space and should be looking for retail businesses.
Comment: most of the list of activities is not strategic, it is a list of things to be done to keep businesses in town and perhaps add more and a reaction to outside decisions. It is mainly staff work. The work required to achieve the items on list is significant and in the 4 years of this council things have gotten worse rather than better. For example it is a bit late for Clairmont to be concerned about 50,000 square feet of empty retail space. It is mostly the result of the development of the south end plaza and he cheerled that initiative along with others on the council. Guerriero is right about the need for a vision. Again he has been on council for 7 years. Why is this need for a vision coming now? Less talk, more action and performance are needed. The public must keep a close watch on the progress on these items. They are vital for the town economy, to keep and grow. The most important items, façade – the Bia will press this one- and the Centre of Excellence and the Muskoka Centre need good broad community involvement and watching.
Debentures. By-laws to debenture 2.9 million were approved. The money is for the new municipal offices and the cost overrun on the medical centre servicing. A twenty year term is proposed at 4.63%. This will increase taxes by 2.8% every year for the next 20 years. TPilger asked if the renovation cost for the municipal offices is really 1.9 million as it was supposed to be less. He was not answered.
Comment: the CAO was sitting at the head table. Why was councillor Pilger not given an answer? And why did he not press further. Keep posted on the costs. Any bets?
Zoning by-law
A report on the appeals was tabled and the solicitor to represent the town was approved. The report recommends discussion with the appellants and the planner feels that most issues can be resolved without going to the OMB.
Paisley Donaldson and Lou Guerriero will represent the town in discussion with the lake associations about their appeal to uncontrolled re-development on the waterfront. The council position is that they will discuss with appellants, but that they still support the by-law as passed.
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Council Notes June 1, 2010 Without Prejudice
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.
This meeting covered routine matters.
Deputations:
1. Doug Wallis reported on the 2010 Gravenhurst Winter Carnival. The event was very successful and realized a profit. They were able to give back to the community by making a donation to the Gravenhurst Opera House Star Quest. The 2011 Winter Carnival will be held on Feb. 25, 26, and 27.
2. Three deputation were made regarding a proposed land exchange on Tomingas Rd. Tomingas Road traverses property owned by the Brays and they are proposing to convey the Tomingas road encroachment property to the Town of Gravenhurst in exchange for a portion of the Town owned unopened road allowance abutting their property. John Duck spoke on behalf of the Gilberts who own the property to the east and use a portion of the unopened road allowance to access their property. Rick McCann spoke on behalf of the Brays who are prepared to grant a right-of-way to the Gilberts. The Gilbert's driveway encroaches upon the Bray property as well as crosses the unopened road allowance. David Berny, the Gilberts lawyer, also spoke.
Community Services
1. Committee passed a resolution accepting the proposal from Cottage County Communications to produce the 2010-2011 Fall & Winter and 2011 Spring & Summer Recreation and Leisure Guides.
2. Committee passed a resolution including the metal plant stand at the Berlet property (White Pine Parkette) in their 2010 watering schedule. Sander Motors supplies the water truck that the Town uses to water the hanging baskets, containers and garden sites. This year Town staff will be performing the watering. The Berlet property will add approximately 45 minutes to the watering program. It is estimated that the town will be watering once every 6 days depending on the weather. Volunteers will water the Berlet property on the other days.
Public Works
1. Committee passed a resolution to provide $5000 in funding to the Muskoka Heritage Foundation for planting along the Muskoka Wharf Boardwalk. The area selected this year will be a continuation of last year's vitalization. The money will come from the Wharf operational budget. The tentative date for planting is June 19
Development Services.
1. Land Exchange Application – Bray. In 2004 a group application was submitted by the owner of the Bray property and the owner at that time of the Gilbert property to close the original shore road allowance in the front of their properties. A survey revealed that a portion of the traveled part of Tomingas Road traversed the backlot portion of their respective properties. In 2005 the owners of the Gilbert property acquired the OSRA and part of the Tomingas Rd. unopened road allowance in exchange for a portion of their property containing the raod encroachment. The owner of the Bray property was not involved in the land exchange and paid the full fee to purchase the OSRA. In 2009 the Brays submitted a proposal to receive a portion of the Town owned unopened road allowance in exchange for a section of their property containing the Tomingas Road encroachment. Staff presented three options to Committee. Committee voted to defer in order to give the affected parties a chance to sit down with staff and come up with a solution agreeable to all parties.
2. Comprehensive Zoning By-law appeals received – Staff outlined appeals filed that met the deadline for appeals. Twelve have been filed – the majority are site specific. Staff feel that most can be settled in the pre-hearing process. A further report will be brought forward in two weeks. The appeals are:
1) Muldrew Lake Cottagers Association – expansion of existing shoreline dwellings.
2) Duke & George Restorations – site specific (Three Mile Lake)
3) Judith Godfrey – site specific (Three Mile Lake)
4) Sheldon Godfrey – site specific (Three Mile Lake)
5) Kempenfeldt Theatre Productions Ltd – site specific (Three Mile Lake)
6) Kahshe Lake Ratepayers Assoc. - expansion of existing shoreline dwellings.
7) Brian Ferguson – site specific (Lake Muskoka)
8) Kauffman, Burns, Gavendo, Sparrow Lake Ass. - site specific (Wiancko House)
9) Bell – site specific (Kahshe Lake)
10) Robert List – entire set of schedules
11) Patlyn Company Limited – site specific (Lantern Marina lands)
12) Joseph & Karen Donohue – site specific (Shamrock Marina lands)
Economic Development
1. Terms of Reference for the Establishment of a Highway 11 Committee – Staff presented Terms Reference for a Committee to address the issues related to the options that the MTO is considering to improve the section of the Highway 11 corridor from Washago to the south entrance to Gravenhurst. The role of the Highway 11 committee is to prepare, for approval of Council, a response to the proposed study of Feb., 2010. The objective of the response is to identify the potential economic and personal impact to individuals and business located along that stretch as well as impacts on the Town and District. The study is to include, but not be limited to: 1) Impact on property values; 2) Impact on possible sale of property; 3) Loss of employment; 4) Loss or retail sales; 5) Impact of assessment values and subsequent loss of property taxes; 6) Forced closure of active businesses; 7) Disruption & negative impact on quiet enjoyment and personal lifestyle; 8) Cost of downloading of current sections of Provincial Highway to lower tier municipalities; 9) Potential affect on historical properties and 10) Environmental issues created by the continued development or relocation of Highway 11. Names put forward for the Committee were: Council – Terry Pilger; Staff – Peter Rigby, Nick Popovich and Ken Watson; and Citizens – Jay Mothersill, Jodi Holder, Michael Lawley and Stuart Morley. Councillor Bob Colhoun was concerned that there was not more representation from the Highway 11 businesses. Peter Rigby pointed out that the Committee Structure allows for no less than 4 and nor more than 6 members from the community at large and that Associate Members (non voting) can be recruited to help with any project or subcommittee. The resolution was amended to include two additional members of the Highway 11 corridor. The resolution approved the Terms of Reference as well as appointing the named members and was passed.
Corporate Services
1. Compliance Audit Committee – On March 2, 2010 Council passed a resolution to accept in principle the concept of a Muskoka Wide Compliance Audit Committee. This Committee would deal with applications for compliance audits of candidates' 2010 municipal election campaign finances and any by-election campaign finances during the 2010 to 2014 Council term. The Committee will be comprised of 3 members of the public with the provision for 1 alternate member. Their term of appointment is consistent with each term of council. The remuneration is a per diem rate of $125 per meeting and mileage of $0.41 per kilometre. Committee passed a resolution endorsing the Terms of Reference for the Muskoka Compliance Audit Committee.
2. Bill 168- An Act to Amend the Occupation Health & Safety Act with Respect to Violence and Harassment in the Workplace – Staff presented a report for information and comment. The amendments of the Act come into effect June 15, 2010. At that time all workplaces in Ontario with 5 or more employees will be required to have the necessary policies, program & Procedures posted and in place. Training must be provided to all employees, elected officials , local boards and committees and volunteers. The policies will deal with violence in the workplace, harassment and domestic violence. The policies lay out what the Town will do and how they will do it. The town will have something in place for the June 15 deadline.
3. Library Board minutes Apr. 14.
Council was routine matters. Council then went into closed session to deal with matters about identifiable individuals.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Council Notes May 27, 2010 Without Prejudice
This meeting is called the Planning Council because the matters being considered are planning matters.
Overall comment: the 3 applications all wanted to enlarge their principle residences towards the lake thereby lessening already deficient setbacks. Only one of the three involved no terrain change or further loss of vegetation. The planner’s reports indicated that setbacks have the purpose of protecting the health of the lakes and the character of the shorelines. council did not ask how the proposals addressed these fundamental mandated requirements. Also where decks are to be enclosed it was never answered if these were legal. Under the new by-law any components to be utilized in the change must be legal.
Applications 3 were heard plus 12 OSRA closure
Lake Muskoka, Taylor island Basilij Approved
They are requesting a 400 square foot room to be added at the side, plus they want to enlarge an existing deck closer to the water. The planner indicated that there is plenty of room on the lot to expand elsewhere away from the lake. Nevertheless approval was recommended. Colhoun asked what will happen to an existing holding tank. It will be moved. No questions were asked about why the cottage could not be enlarged away from the lake.
North Muldrew Lake Reilly Deferred
Here again the applicant wants to enlarge a cottage and move closer to the lake. The intention: enclose an existing deck and build another deck even closer to the lake in front of the newly enclosed area. The planner supported enclosing the existing deck but opposed the new deck. The plan submitted was inaccurate so was amended in the meeting. Councillor Wilson wanted to know the age of the existing deck. This was not answered. Colhoun wanted to know if revised drawing changes affected planner’s initial recommendation. No. But then confusion; will vegetation would be affected. The confusion led councillor TPilger to ask for a deferral so that questions about tree preservation could be answered.
Lake Muskoka, Taylor island Diedrick Approved
The applicant wants to enclose the area under an existing deck thereby bringing the habitable space closer to the lake. this is the one application which does not change the vegetation or run off or other factors which affect the lake. no questions were asked.
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Council Notes April 20, 2010 Without Prejudice
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.
Council met in closed session at 2pm re 3 items under Personal Matters About an Individual plus a legal matter and property acquisition/disposition. The property matter was to relist the Doctors' Building on Muskoka Rd. S. Councillor Terry Pilger declared a pecuniary interest re the property matter.
Deputations
1. Robbie Irvine spoke on behalf of the Blue Skies Network re the White Pine Parkette. She updated Council re plans for this year. The Blue Skies are again seeking donations from the public re sponsorship of plants for the “tree”. They also asked the Town to consider watering the flowers once a week, since staff have been hired for watering and also asked if a garbage bin and bicycle stand could be placed near the parkette.
2. Brandon McGregor updated Council re BIA activities and explained the budget for this year. The BIA has partnered with the Chamber of Commerce and this year's Fashion Show was the most successful to date.
3. Evelyn Matson & Al Denne presented on behalf of the Transportation Committee. They updated Council on the Committee's activities. They would like to have a system in place for the summer months, beginning on Wednesday June 30th. Costs to establish and run for the summer months would include, operational cots, and initial start up fees which would amount to approximately $22,00 to $24,000. They were asking for support to apply for funding from “Futures” for $5,000; for permission to pursue a professional transportation report if funded by Government funds and asking for Council's ongoing support.
4. Public Meeting re: Building Department Fees Changes – no member of the public spoke.
5. Brian Ferguson re Ditchburn Bay Boathouses – He was speaking to Council once again re this proposed plan. He thanked Council for their positive attitude. He said the Ditchburn Bay Association understands rules have to be followed and requested that the town fund the OP and Zoning amendment applications and the studies required. They feel this will benefit the entire town – the area will be cleaned up, jobs will be provided and the tax base will increase. He asked that Council consider the net benefit to the town.
COMMUNITY SERVICES
1. Gull Lake Rotary Park Snack Bar Lease – The Request for Proposals for the snack bar closed on Apr. 21. Three packages were picked up but no responses were received. The RFP was released again with two food service options – one for a full food service and one for a cold service only. The RFP closes May 28.
2. Minutes of Centennial Centre/Aquatic Facility Decision Committee meeting Apr 8.
3. An Open House for the Centennial Centre Expansion & New Aquatic Facility will be held on May 29 from 10am to 1pm at the Legion. The Architects, Construction Manager and representatives of the YMCA and the Town will be present to answer any questions. The Mayor has already presented updates to the Rotary Club and the Pine Ridge Homeowners Association.
4. Fred Schulz presented re Music on the Barge. The first concert is Sun. June 20 with the Muskoka Concert Band and the closing show is Aug. 15 with the Good Brothers. The rainout location this year is the Gravenhurst Opera House.
Public Works
1. The Public Works Committee supports the Girl Guides & Pathfinders in continuing the Yellow Fish Program. The Yellow Fish program highlights to the public an awareness of how pollutants might enter the stormwater system and the natural environment through municipal stormwater drains. Last year the program was implemented on John St. S., Mary St. S. and part of Hotchkiss St. This year they will be working on Sarah St. N. and S. Public Works provides traffic cones, work gloves and safety vests.
2. Proposal re Wanda III Boathouse – At the May 4th meeting the Muskoka Steamship and Historical Society presented a proposal re the boathouse. The Muskoka Wharf Board supports the proposal. Staff have investigated the proposal and some items need further investigation such as land ownership, compliance with municipal by-laws and dialogue with the neghbourhood. A report will come back to Committee.
3. Wharf Board minutes of meetings held Mar 9 and Apr. 13.
Development Services
1. Ditchburn Bay Boathouse – study estimates. Staff have obtained preliminary verbal estimates re environmental and traffic studies - $5000 to $6000 for environmental and $6000 to $8000 for traffic. Some councillors questioned if previous studies done at the Wharf would suffice. Nick Popovich explained that these studies would be used as a base. The impact of the redevelopment of the boathouses would have to be evaluated. He stated development charges would be applicable as there is no residential component there now. Mayor Klinck stated this is a unique initiative -he cannot recall having a defined neighbourhood come forward before. He suggested the proponents meet with the neighbourhood, particularly the Muskoka Bay Properties Owners Association. Mr. Ferguson said they are in the process of putting together a list of boathouse owners in favour of the proposal – he believes it will be 60% to 70%. They want people to understand the possibilities for the area and will meet with anyone. Councillor Terry Pilger thinks the idea is worth keeping alive.
Economic Development
1. Amy Taylor presented a report on behalf of the Transportation Committee. She reiterated the Committee's points that they were asking the Economic Development Committee to support and answered Committee's questions. A route of 23 stops is proposed. The route will connect the Wharf, South End Plaza and Uptown. Stops at the Centennial Centre, new Municipal Office and key businesses have also been included. The route takes 1 hour to complete. The fee suggested is $2 for adults and children under 12 free. The Committee recognizes that the service at this time would only be for July and August. The Committee is going to try to fundraise to cover costs of this service this year. Committee passed a resolution supporting: 1.) The submission of a funding application to Muskoka Futures, for $5,00 in seed funding for a summer service. 2) Permission to pursue a professional transportation study, only if funded 100% by provincial or federal funds. 3) Permission to continue working on a possible transit solution, including soliciting funds, obtaining quotations and promoting the possible operation times and routes and that once all funds ($24,700) to run a summer service have been obtained to draft a contract with Hammond Transportion to provide summer service. 4) The contract would be returned to the Economic Development Committee for consideration.
The Transportion Committee has discussed purchasing a vehicle. It was agreed that having a service provider is the best option for the Town to start with. They are looking at a 14 -16 passenger leased vehicle with decals of the Segwun on the sides. Purchasing a trolley is still a possibility in the future but it will take time to go through the funding applications.
Corporate Services.
1. Amendment to the Burning Control By-law 2005-208 as amended – Commititee passed a resolution which will regulate bonfires.
2. Committee passed a resolution approving a request from the Severn Bridge Agricultural Society for $4,400 to assist in construction and improvements to the Fairgrounds. The funds will be allocated from the Rural Facility Assistance Reserve. Additional funding will be allocated to the Reserve in the 2011 Budget.
3. A resolution was passed approving the 2010 levy requisition in the amount of $35000 for the Business Improvement Area.
4. Fees and Services By-law – At the Council meeting a by-law was passed adopting the new fees.
5. A resolution was passed adopting revised terms of reference for the Gravenhurst Accessibility Advisory Committee.
6. 2010 Final Levy By-law – At the Council meeting a by-law was passed adopting the annual lower tier levy; tax rates for upper and lower tiers and to provide for penalty and interest in default of payments. Treasury staff are currently preparing final tax bills. The due date will be Aug. 31/10. The 2010 levy for Gravenhurst is $7,969,677.
7. Transition to New Financial System & Quarterly Financial Reports – The Town is moving to a new Financial System (Vadim). The is a joint venture through the Muskoka computer Centre at the District of Muskoka and includes the District, Bracebridge, Lake of Bays Township and Muskoka Lakes Township.
Councillor Mark Clairmont announced that the Municipal Heritage Committee was successful in its application for funds for improvements to the Barge.
Council Meeting
This is where the excitement began. When the resolution to approve the May 4th, 2010 Committee of the Whole minutes came forward, Councillor Terry Pilger asked that Recommendation “C” be removed and reconsidered. This recommendation dealt with awarding the entire existing Municipal Office space to the Fire Department. Councillor Lou Guerriero felt there was a procedural issue with pulling and reconsideration of a motion that was passed with a recorded vote. He said it didn't make sense to reconsider. The CAO and Clerk conferred and determined that a 2/3 vote was needed to dispense with Notice of Motion. This was achieved. Terry Pilger had to give his reasons for wanting to remove the recommendation – he felt that it had been rushed. He acknowledged that the Fire Department deserves excellent training facilities. He wanted to defer until there was a more in depth report and felt the public needs to see the layout of how the Fire Department plans to use the space. He said there is no panic – take time to look at the proposal and move forward with a proper plan. Lou Guerriero said there is no final plan. An empty building gives the Fire Department the ability to plan. Any requests for capital expenditures would have to come before Council anyway. It was also said that the building was built for the Fire Department. Councillor Mark Clairmont is convinced the Fire Department has a case for the whole building and he is satisfied he has enough information to make the decision. He is convinced there will be no major costs. Councillor Sandy Cairns was unable to attend the May 4 meeting but supports the Fire Department and think their current conditions are a disgrace. Bob Colhoun stated that yes, they need the space but do they need all of the space? Councillor Paisley Donaldson said this is embarrassing – they made the decision. She was upset that members of the public write letters and put them in the newspaper. Councillor Tracey Wilson supported deferring and looking at the situation more closely. In a recorded vote the motion to defer was defeated with only Councillors Terry Pilger and Tracy Wilson supporting it. COMMENT – This certainly sparked lively debate amongst the Councillors. Some of the councillors just don't seem to get it. There is great support and respect for the volunteers of the Fire Department. Yes they need and deserve more space. However, no written report or proposed layout were brought to the May 4 meeting. Once again, there appears to be a lack of planning. Surely there has been dialogue in recent months regarding the needs of the Fire Department. How can it be that the Chamber of Commerce was asked to bring forward a proposal for renting part of the current municipal office space and then “suddenly” after councillors toured the Fire Hall it is determined that the Fire Department requires the whole space? The Mayor stated there is a conceptual plan of how the building will be utilized and that any member of the public can ask to see it. If you are interested in viewing this preliminary plan contact the Mayor or a member of Council. It has been stated that the building was built for the Fire Department and that Council is returning the building to the Fire Department. The writer believes that the two story addition was built for the municipal offices.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Council Notes April 20, 2010 Without Prejudice
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.
Council met in closed session at 2pm re property acquisition/disposition. No resolutions but a staff report will come forward in another month.
Mayor Klinck donned a hockey jersey from the Deseronto Storm. Mayor Klinck and the Mayor of Deseronto had a friendly wager during the recent Muskoka Shield hockey playoffs. The Mayor of the unsuccessful team had to wear a hockey jersey from the winning team for an entire Council meeting, as well as make a donation to a charity of his choice. Mayor Klinck announced he would be delivering a cheque to the Gravenhurst Salvation Army in the name of the Deseronto Storm team.
This was a very long meeting – approximately 6 hours long.
Deputations:
1. Derrick Hammond from the District of Muskoka re Technical Study Review Process. The District is looking to reevaluate their approach to peer review of technical studies to address natural hazard, environmental and engineering issues. Most engineering studies are reviewed by Muskoka's Engineering & Public Works staff. However, when “in house” expertise is unavailable the Muskoka Official Plan enables Muskoka to peer review the report at the applicant's expense. Currently, staff distributes requests for quotation for each technical report and different firms are retained. The exception to this is Water Quality assessments – one firm has been retained by the District with a standardized checklist. Staff are proposing this same approach to other peer reviews. There would be a sole provider with a term of 5 years with a yearly review. There would be no cost to the Town. He was looking to see if the Town was interested. Nick Popovich had no concerns and feels it would streamline the process followed now. Mayor Klinck, Development Services chair, Paisley Donaldson, and Nick Popovich are to dialogue and a report will be brought forward.
2. Mr. John Ross spoke regarding the proposed site plan agreement for Mr. Ernest Wuebbolt (Muskoka Lake). Mr. Wuebbolt applied for a minor variance for a proposed boathouse. The minor variance was approved subject to the applicant entering into a Site Plan Agreement with the town. The Committee of Adjustment specified that the removal of the boat port be done in accordance with best practices. Mr. Ross is the lawyer for the adjoining neighbour who commissioned a Site Evaluation Report. He stressed that every item in the site plan agreement is essential. This will be dealt with further under the Development Services Committee.
3. Mr. Brian Ferguson made an interesting deputation on behalf of the Ditchburn Bay Boathouse Owners Association. He presented a concept of renovation of the boathouses. Currently there are 57 boathouses in the Bay with 40 owners. The proposed concept calls for boathouses on the bottom, living quarters on top of the boathouses and a sun deck. The 40 owners are in general agreement on where they are going. The proposal would require an Official Plan amendment as well as zoning changes. They are asking that a special zone be created to recognize this special area. This approach is unique and would need a design and system to make it work. They do not want to force anyone to participate until they are ready and therefore it would be a long term project. All would be on sewers and town water. The density will not change. They would like to get the necessary approvals and design one unit. Units would fill in as owners decide to participate. Mr. Ferguson described the benefits to the town and the Wharf area. They want the co-operation of the town to cut red tape and are asking that the town take out all roadblocks and unnecessary costs. They consider this a renovation, not new construction, and so therefore there should be no development charges. Many councillors showed support for the project but did recognize that there are challenges and a process that must be followed. Nick Popovich advised that the OP and zoning amendments (Town & District) would take approximately 4 to 6 months. A formal application is necessary to proceed but if Council desires the staff report could be done before.
4. Jodi Holder spoke on behalf of the Chamber of Commerce. They are investigating a new location for the Chamber office and would like to be in the centre of Town. They are expanding to also provide health cards. She described challenges for the downtown area with the move of the Town Offices, as well as the loss of Giant Tiger, the Liquor Store, amd the IGA store. The Chamber projects they will serve over 20,000 customers in 1 year. They are proposing a lease agreement with the Town for a portion of the main floor of the current municipal building. They would have to structure timelines with Service Ontario and require their approval for any new location. This takes approximately 6 to 8 weeks. Mayor Klinck stated that the Town's major consideration is the Fire Department's needs. CAO, Cindy Maher estimates the municipal office move for the end of June. Councillor Paisley Donaldson questioned accessibility issues – the main doors would be an issue. When asked if there would be renovations required, Ms. Holder said yes but nothing structural. The Chamber was asking if there is an appetite at Council and within the community for the possible lease of the proposed space. Councillor Clairmont wondered if the Chamber had explored other initiatives such as the Community Policing Office, the Carnegie Centre or the former IDA Drug Store location. Ms. Holder stated that the Chamber is trying to solve a couple of issues – their own space and also help the BIA. She asked if there is a process for the Chamber to get an indication if leasing at the current Town offices is a possibility. Mayor Klinck advised that the Town will be coming to terms with the Fire Department needs and will know by the first Council meeting in May.
5. Lisa & Dave Yeates (Sparrow Lake). The Yeates' want to purchase a portion of town owned park land which is adjacent to their cottage in order to build a garage. Their request came before the Development Services Committee at the Jan. 19 meeting and was deferred at that time. This request was dealt with at the Development Services Committee (see notes below).
6. John Duck spoke re the new comprehensive by-law and its implementation. His concern is septic systems and setbacks. The issue came up when an application was submitted for an upgrade to an existing septic system. His concern was with the proposed sliding scale re enlargement and extension of non-complying residences in the residential waterfront zones. Although this has been removed from the new zoning by-law he feels it will come up again. If there is a return to the sliding scale Mr. Duck urges that both structures above the ground and septics are looked at.
COMMUNITY SERVICES
1. 1. Gravenhurst Centennial Centre & Aquatic Facility Healthy Food Choices – Judy Vanderveer, Town of Gravenhurst Recreation Program Coordinator and Brenda Marshall and Mary Ellen Dean of the Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit made a presentation regarding the Eat Smart Recreation Centre Program. This program recognizes and promotes nutrition, food safety and supports a smoke-free environment. Staff are proposing that our new recreation/aquatic centre apply to be an Eat Smart Recreation Centre. The Community Services Department would apply to the local Health Unit to become an Eat Smart Centre. The Health Unit will assist the Community Services Department via a registered dietitian who will work with staff to create menu choices, create visual displays, promote “Eat Smart” items on the menu and provide credible nutrition information. Committee passed a resolution directing staff to develop an Eat Smart Recreation Policy and to become an Eat Smart Centre.
2. Take heart Muskoka and New Healthy Communities Ontario Approach – Judy Vanderveer provided an update on the Take Heart Partnership of Muskoka and their accomplishments since 1998. We will now be taking part in the new Healthy Communities Ontario approach. Take Heart Muskoka received a letter from the Medical Officer of Health for the SMDHU confirming funding for the Ontario Heart Health Program.
3. Minutes of Decision Committee meeting March 25.
PUBLIC WORKS
1. Addition Licensed Docking at Muskoka Wharf –The Muskoka Wharf Board is recommending that an additional 6 dock slips be built. Five applicants have submitted completed license agreements and deposits to secure possible docking space for the 2010 boating season. The Muskoka Wharf Board has adequate funds to construct the new docks. The cost of the docks is $37,690 plus GST. Committee passed the resolution endorsing the recommendation. Councillor Sandy Cairns was the only councillor not in agreement.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1. Wuebbolt Site Plan Agreement – Mr. Wuebbolt requested that he be allowed to speak and Committee granted permission. As noted under deputations, a boat port was to removed and a site plan agreement entered into. Mr. Wuebbolt does not oppose the removal of the boat port but does question requirements of the site plan agreement to restore the shoreline. The Committee of Adjustment did not mention restoring the area. A building permit was issued in October/09 and construction commenced. The boat port was existing when he purchased the property in 2003. The property has 725 foot of frontage on Lake Muskoka. The small sand beach next to the boat port was not maintained by the previous owner. The Wuebbolts want shallow and deep water areas for swimming and also more parking area. In the spring of 2003 the Wuebbolts contracted Coon Brothers to clear the area. Mr. Wuebbolt claims he developed the area legally (this was confirmed by Nick Popovich) and wonders why they are being asked to remove it now. He asked that points under #4 in the site plan agreement be removed – these deal with rehabilitating the area. Councillor Sandy Cairns expressed concerns with that much gravel so close to the water. Mayor Klinck asked if Mr. Wuebbolt would be happy with the conditions of the site plan agreement to remove the boat port and the gravel next to there. Councillor Bob Colhoun felt the Committee of Adjustment was looking to have remedial work done in the boat port area only and was surprised when reading the report that the neighbour would have Michalski, Nielson make comment for her. Councillor Lou Guerriero felt that a site visit should be undertaken. He feels it needs to be done right with professional advice. A site visit is planned for April 27 re other work and committee decided to defer this until after that visit.
2. Proposed Purchase of Town Lands – Yeates - See deputation above. Staff recommended that the lands be retained by the Town as they provide public access to Sparrow Lake. These lands were dedicated to the Town as parkland through a subdivision agreement dated March 7, 1968. The purpose of this lands was to provide water access to the subdivision's interior lot owners. A licence of occupation was granted in 2006 to construct a dock on the property and expires in 2017. The Yeates want to purchase a portion of the lands to construct a double car garage and feel that it would not interfere with public access or the licence of occupation. A request by a previous landowner to purchase the property was refused. Committee passed, in a recorded vote, a resolution that the lands be retained by the Town. The only Councillor to vote no was Mark Clairmont.
3. Comprehensive Review – Gravenhurst Zoning By-law – Wianko House Property (Sparrow Lake) – The recommendation of the planning team remains that this property be zoned Commercial Waterfront. This was deferred at the April 6 meeting so that staff could meet with the new owners to understand the intended scale of development and the commercial operation envisioned. On April 8 members of the planning team and several Council representatives met with the agents of the new owners. They prefer the current zoning. The neighbours have concerns that it does not conform with the Official Plan. Nick Popovich is comfortable that keeping the zoning “as is” conforms with the OP. Staff did indicate that the owners would be required into a Site Plan Agreement with the Town and noted that it would be important to buffer abutting landowners from any proposed development.
4. Application to Close Original Shore Road Allowance and to Close Unopened Road Allowance – Page (Kashe Lake). This is regarding the application which included the donation of the severed lot, a “Natural Heritage Area”, (a cranberry marsh) to the Muskoka Heritage Heritage Trust. Mr. Page wishes to acquire ownership of a portion of the Unopened Road Allowance and Original Shore Road Allowance in order to increase the minimum lot frontage of the proposed retained lot. Committee, in a recorded vote, passed a resolution declaring the property surplus and waiving the $559.60 Original Shore Road Closing application fee. Terry Pilger was the only Councillor to vote no.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
1. Provision of Visitor Information Services – Community Development Officer, Peter Rigby, brought forward a report at the April 6 meeting Committee passed a resolution at that time directing staff to look at contracting out the provision of Visitor Information Services for 2010. There is currently $28000 in the budget. Mr. Rigby brought forward another report. In this report he presented 3 options:
1. Accept the proposal of the Chamber of Commerce – The Chamber would maintain a visitor information centre on behalf of the municipality on fee for service basis. The Centre would be maintained in the current Chamber office location. The Chamber would ensure that all staff was appropriately trained. Hours would mirror the License office: Mon – Fri 8:30am to 5:30pm and Saturday 9am – 12pm. Cost May – December $34,000.
2. Publish a request for proposal . Time constraints would make this option difficult.
3. Town Delivered – Under supervision of the staff of the Economic Development Dept. and with assistance of the Opera House Staff, deliver visitor information at the Opera House. The Visitor Information would be staffed by 2.5 students for a 12 week period ending Labour Day weekend. Cost of student wages (without any subsidies) at $12.00 per hour would be $14,400 plus required benefits that could total up to an additional $2,200. This could be reduced with wages of $11 per hour. An additional consideration could be the use of a part-time student from Labour Day through Thanksgiving weekend or to the end of the year.
Mr. Rigby recommended Option 3 – Town delivered for the following reasons:
1. Town Policy that the purchase of any service or goods over $25,000 requires that a request for proposal be issued.
2. Time if of the essence and staff contends that insufficient time exists to undertake the RFP process and to ensure that all requirements for the delivery of the service are properly documented.
3. Time is of the essence and there is a need to start as soon as possible.
4. As this is an initial step in the development of proper visitor information services for final implementation in 2011, the operation of the services by staff will provide staff with needed information for the development of the 2011 RFP and of any relevant policies and procedures.
5. There is a need to identify the optimum location from which to deliver services.
Committee was generally supportive staff's recommendation. Mayor Klinck and Councillor Donaldson wanted to wait until the May 4 meeting when the Chamber will know if the Town is interested in leasing space to them. In a recorded vote, committee passed a resolution directing staff to implement Town delivery of Visitor Information Services. Councillor Donaldson and Mayor Klinck voted no.
2. Economic Development Activity Report
3. Minutes of the Economic Development Strategy Committee meeting – March 10.
CORPORATE SERVICES
1. Asset Disposal re Municipal Office Renovation – According to the CAO's report many articles such as doors and frames, lights, fixtures, HVAC equipment are to be saved and reused via the architect's design for the new office. However, there will be many reusable articles that cannot be used in the renovation. Some articles can be re-allocated to other departments but others will require disposal. Two twenty foot storage containers are on site and are nearly full of reusable office furniture, tables and chairs, etc) with other goods being stored in rooms that will soon be under construction. Committee passed a resolution authorizing the CAO to declare the building materials and other articles surplus and to donate those not readily sold and not being used by other municipal departments to the Habitat for Humanity Restore and that the public be informed that these items are available for sale at the Restore. The Restore will provide pickup.
2. Mayor's Annual Golf Tournament – Last year (the first year for the tournament) there were 140 participants and $30,000 was raised. The recipient of these funds was the education programs at the Muskoka Boat and Heritage Centre. This year the Gravenhurst Curling Club will be helping and will be the benefactor of funds raised. The tournament will be held in the third week of August.
COUNCIL MEETING
Reports from Municipal Officers – Comprehensive Zoning By-law Review – Greg Corbett of Planscape summarized the public consultation process and revision to the zoning by-law since the second public meeting. Included in the revisions was the removal of the sliding scale re enlargement and extension of non-complying residences in the Residential Waterfront Zones. At the April 6 council meeting the Planning Team was directed to delete the proposed sliding scale and return the provision to that which existed under By-law No. 94-54 which would not limit expansions provided that there was no increase in the existing encroachment. Since then the President of the Kashe Lake Ratepayers Association submitted a request that the sliding scale be maintained and at a minimum be applicable to Kashe Lake properties. This was included in the Zoning By-law for Kashe Lake. Councillor Terry Pilger asked about the Kashe Lake Plan, which was put into the Official Plan and if they had asked for the sliding scale at the time. Councillor Lou Guerriero wondered if Council was comfortable with putting in the sliding scale for Kashe Lake with just one letter received. Council passed a resolution to delete the Section re the sliding scale for Kashe Lake. Councillor Paisley Donaldson had had a request for a specific property on Kashe Lake for a special provision on their property reducing the 30m setback to 24m. She could not get a seconder for her motion.
Council passed two by-laws – to Deem Part of a Registered Plan not to be Registered (Levere/Cousineau)-Sparrow Lake. This allows them to merge their lot with the portion of unopened road allowance that they purchased.
With a recorded vote, which was unanimous, Council also passed the by-law to enact a Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Town of Gravenhurst and to Repeal By-law No. 94-54 and Amendments thereto.
Council also passed a resolution recognizing the names of the volunteers that plan to work on the parkette on the Berlet Property.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Council Notes April 6, 2010 Without Prejudice
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.
Mayor Klinck was absent. Council met in closed session re proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land and personal matters about an indentifileable individual. No resolutions came out of the closed session.
Deputations:
Community Services
Public Works
Development Services
Expansion or Reconstruction of Non-complying residences in the Residential Waterfront Zones – The existing by-law permits new dwelling to be reconstructed and/or expanded beyond existing footprints provided that setbacks are respected or maintained and lot coverage is not exceeded. The draft by-law proposes to introduce a sliding scale that would link the permitted amount of expansion to the existing setback from the shoreline. The sliding scale would allow the as-of-right expansion only if the dwelling is located greater than 10.0 metres from the shoreline. The recommendation of the planning teams was to keep the proposed sliding scale. Council chose to keep the status quo as stated in the current existing by-law.
Wianko House Property – the existing by-law zones the property Commercial Waterfront subject to special provisions that limit the number of units to 25 single detached dwellings and 35 accommodation units in a tourist establishment as well as adds Commercial Recreation as an addition permitted use. The draft by-law would retain the same zoning for the property. Neighbouring landowners have requested that the property be zoned Residential Waterfront in part and Rural in part. Mayor Klinck was to meet with the new owner of the property to find out what he has to say. Councillor Cairns said Council had received a letter from the new owners of the property and Committee needs time to get more information and to give the new owner the chance to let Committee know what he is proposing for the property. Again after a great deal of discussion, committee passed a resolution directing staff to talk to the new owner.
Economic Development
Corporate Services.
Council Meeting
As well as the above noted by-law, council passed a by-law to deem part of a Registered Plan not to be Registered (Stephen and Mary Lyon). - Kashe Lake – Three lots will be merged, thereby creating one parcel of land. The Deeming by-law is requested by the owners in order to obtain a building permit.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Gravenhurst Council Notes March 23, 2010 without prejudice
This meeting is called the planning council because the matters being considered are planning matters. 7 applications requesting exemptions to the zoning by-law were heard.
Overall comment: the applications part of the meeting was public with opportunity for the public to speak. And there was a lot of speaking. The Daviau application on Driftwood Island has the neighbours concerned. Overall it was 5 hours long. Bethune House and its architects also made a brief presentation on the new visitor centre being designed.
We still have councillors like Cairns and Colhoun who do not get the fact that the cumulative effect of their decisions has negative impact on the town. In this case they missed and even opposed the concept that buildings should relate to the street and the town and to people walking and even entering the town via car. They saw no reason why a new development on the main entry way at the gate should have a street friendly design and access to retail. Yet the Bethune presentation architects made the point that if you want to build Gravenhurst as a desireable town the whole relation to and maintenance of the character of the town has a role to play. The result of a blinkered viewpoint to development achieves a whole that is less than the sum of its parts. Opportunities are not only lost, they have a negative impact.
Bethune House
Parks Canada staff and architects did a brief presentation on the visitor centre design. It will be a LEED project, i.e. energy and environmentally friendly. It will be started this fall and finished next spring. The centre will be on Brown Street and will give a sense of importance and arrival for the visitors but will fit into the context of the town. It will use materials that are local and traditional, wood and rock, and will have exhibition space and washrooms as well as the capacity to handle large numbers. The architect made the point that this is not just about placing a building on a site, it is also about using the town to give visitors a sense of Gravenhurst, and carrying through the reflection of Bethune as a Canadian and an innovator. The designs look very interesting. Phase 2 will involve a café and gift shops. It will be accessible.
Applications 7 were heard plus 2 OSRA closures
Lake Muskoka, Brydons Bay Driftwood Island Daviau
This single residence island is being proposed for cluster development, which is permitted under the Official Plan. In cluster developments the residential units shall be set back and the shoreline area is retained as common use area. They want 6 envelopes approved with a cottage, bunkie, shed, boathouse, dock and septic for each. The reason for 6, they have 5 children and want each to be able to have their own place in the future. The island is 20 acres and could be severed into more than 6 lots, in which case each could build the structures proposed. The island has some environmentally sensitive areas and an environmental impact study has been done. The application requires an OP amendment and a zoning by-law exemption to the one property one residence rule and to ensure that the mainland access and parking is tied into the property. The staff recommend approval with site plan control to ensure that the EIS recommendations are implemented.
The neighbours asked for deferral so that they would have time to review the EIS. They are concerned about more residences on the island, too much building, too many boathouses, boat traffic could be increased, one neighbour doesn’t want more boathouses. Design controls should be part of the site plan agreement. No buildings should be allowed on the narrow channel to the east. The waterfront landing lot has also raised concerns as there is fear that trees would be lost, there are easements for 2 other islands, extending the dock could be dangerous, the proposal is for too much parking and too many boat slips.
Council asked about the involvement of the district as an amendment will be required to their OP, is the MOE signed off, if they just want to add one more cottage would this be an issue? Why not do the project in stages over time. The reply is that this is a long term plan and that to proceed piecemeal means multiple applications. Based on comments it was decided to defer. Deferred
Comment; the applicant has legal rights to sever that would create more development and bigger issues than appear to be in this proposal. This cluster approach might be the best solution for all. But, he needs to take time to consult with his neighbours and make clear his intentions regarding impacts on the shoreline and the waterfront landing property. Resolve those issues and then proceed with the proposal.
Muskoka Bay Matthews
This owner has expanded his house and now wants to build a 2 story garage with sleeping cabin on the 2d floor, Approved
Severn River Wright
The owner wants to sever a piece of his property and attach it to the lot next door which will place the boathouse and dock on the lot with the dwelling. An undersized small vacant lot will be created. Staff recommend with site plan control on the undersized lot. Approved
SouthGate Plaza
This is the lot north of the plaza with the hardware and Giant Tiger stores which goes north from the arch to the unopened road allowance (Caroline Street) on the north side. The applicant wants reduced front and side yard setbacks for 3 new proposed buildings one of which will be 2 storey with offices. The hope to acquire the road allowance for entry and have speedy approval so they can proceed. The neighbours at the Oakwood Motel want clarity as to what is proposed with the road allowance and also want setbacks so vegetation can be planted. Storm water and runoff in this area is a problem. Access and storm water management should be sorted out first before approval. There is concern about blasting on the site. A suggestion was made that while the idea of retail and offices here is a good idea the plans should be rethought to make it a street friendly development rather than a 1980s style miniplaza with parking and access at the rear and the backs of the buildings facing the main entrance thoroughfare to the town. Council asked questions about the road allowance (they have 3 options; sell, give a licence of occupation, build a new road bed and road.) they wanted more setback so the proposal was amended to give 2 metres on the north side. Clairmont pressed for answers regarding the impacts of the buildings in relation to the arch and also picked up on the idea of making the development relate to the Muskoka Road street and foot traffic. T.Pilger backed him up. Colhoun and Cairns opposed this idea. Staff suggested that access and storm water and design should be part of the site plan process. Approved
Sparrow lake Craven
She wants to sever the rear portion of her lot and attach it to an abutting backlot. This will give the back lot an existing cottage along with approval for reduced setbacks for side and front yards. Other irregularities with the waterfront dwelling will also be corrected by means of special provisions. Approved
Comment: bad practices in the past combined with lax enforcement of the laws have created many problems throughout the municipality. This old development area on Sparrow Lake is rife with them. The application will correct or legalize some of this historic problem.
South Muldrew lake Martin
The Martins want to add to their cottage and therefore be only 19.6 metres set back from the water. They must purchase the Crown Reserve along the shoreline so building will have to wait until this is done. Approved
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Gravenhurst Council Notes March 16, 2010 without prejudice
Overall Comment: a very uneventful meeting
Winter Carnival the winter carnival committee reported on the successful winter carnival and asked for a $200 fee waiver to utilize the Trillium room at the Opera House for the reception to honour the many volunteers. Approved.
The discussion: councillor Cairns wanted to see the financial report from the committee before agreeing so asked for a delay. The mayor spoke forcefully in favour of the carnival and its impact and T.Pilger said he did not want to place more barriers before volunteers as he hopes the carnival becomes an annual event. Guerriero and B.Pilger indicated they are uncomfortable with waivers for nonprofits as the rental rates are already reduced. In the end all voted for the waiver.
Air show Richard Onley of the Canadian International Air Race Organization briefed council on the plans for a revived air show at the airport. July 17-18 is the date. It will involve vintage WWII airplanes, spitfires, etc. in celebration of the 70th anniversary of the Battle of Britain. Other later planes and acrobatics will also be part of the show. No funding sought but is asking for support in their application to FedNor.
Gull Lake Rotary Park the log and tree replanting project was updated. There will be 4-5 thousand board feet of gull lake Pine available to the public. Notice will be in the papers. The public can also make a donation to plant trees in the park.
Muskoka Road Streetscape improvements. The tenders are received for the new streetlights. It is coming in under estimates. Lights will be the same as installed on the south side of the tracks. They are LED so will use less energy and reduce glare into the sky. All will be funded from the Federal grant announced last year
Road closure. A road off Muriel Crescent will be closed and sold to adjacent lots.
Economic Development The EDO activity report was tabled. Since the Economic development strategy committee identified visitor information as a priority the EDO will bring a feasibility study back to council. Approved to proceed with report in 2 weeks.
Discussion: Cairns, is he planning for this year and mentioned the train station. Klinck indicated that the BIA and Chamber have commented and strongly support the need and its resolution. Clairmont wants to expand from visitor to economic development information. Guerriero cautioned that stetting up this kind of thing takes time and resources and there is only 2 months before tourist season so wants realistic expectations.
Dog and burning control by-laws. The areas for expansion of dog control and burning were approved. Dog licensing fees will increase. A limit will be placed on the number of dogs. Wilson asked about owners in the new areas with more than 3 dogs at present – they will be grandfathered for existing dogs. The mayor wanted to confirm that vets are exempted from the limit.
There was some confused discussion about permitted fires. The definition of permitted depends on purpose of the fire – if for hear or cooking it is allowed. For burning yard waste it is not allowed.
A new fire truck at the Kilworthy station was approved for $425 thousand. Clairmont wanted to know why a tender was not sought rather than a sole supplier. It was explained that standardizing trucks between stations facilitates training. Also the company is reliable.
Comment: Clairmont worries about tenders at this level but did not at the time ask why the municipal project at 1.9 million was not tendered. Very inconsistent.
Debentures. By-laws to debenture 9.3 million were approved. The money is for the new municipal offices and the centennial and aquatic centre expansion. No term or dates for issuing the debentures were provided.
The agreement to receive the gas tax for 4 more years was approved.
Civil marriages the town provides civil marriage ceremonies in town owned facilities and uses 3 commissioners in rotation. The clerk wants to see fees increase, doubled, and to develop new procedures, guidelines and forms. She proposes that as the clerks office staff are very busy this be postponed until September. Colhoun wants to see changes for June and a lower fee. Guerriero asked for a more detailed report to come back. T.Pilger wants to take advantage of the wedding season. Some councillors oppose providing this service and see no need for expansion.
Comment: The issue has arisen as people want to use the commissioners in non-town owned facilities. In the discussion it was indicated that there have been 10 weddings in 2009, the busiest year. The clerk described a make work approach to providing this service. She states that the town staff choose which of the 3 commissioners can be used, book the location, review the ceremony, do the legal paperwork, e.g. mail the licence form to Thunder Bay etc. What could be a simple process has been made complex and bureaucratic. Most of it could be done by placing information on the website. Let people do their own co-ordination. Only the formal paperwork requires town staff involvement. The work load is on the commissioner as they have the contact with the bride and groom. This is missing a great opportunity to bring business into town by placing roadblocks in the way of expansion with no need for additional resources.
October elections a sample of the slightly revised mail in ballot package was shown to council. It is essentially the same as the last election with better instructions.
Committee minutes tabled: Communities in Bloom, the Centennial and Aquatic centre expansion, the Heritage advisory and Economic strategy committees were tabled.
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Council Notes March 2, 2010 Without Prejudice
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.
Community Services
Public Works
Development Services
Economic Development
Corporate Services
A by-law was also passed authorizing the use of optical scanning vote tabulators for counting the votes.
Council MeetingCouncil passed the above noted by-laws and resolutions and then went into closed session – proposed acquisition/disposition of and and a personal matter with respect to an identifiable individual. No resolutions were expected.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Gravenhurst Council Notes February 23, 2010 without prejudice
Overall comment: the applications part of the meeting was public with opportunity for the public to speak. The remarks from the public were brushed off.
The comprehensive zoning by-law discussion was amongst the councillors. The public were spectators. Many of them appear to have not read or understood the relationship of the parts of the zoning by-law and hence how it will play out over time. They clearly have not thought about the consequences of implementing the staff recommendations. The associations have commented on the drafts in writing and in meetings and no councilor asked how their concerns are being addressed. The overall impact is to say that for these councillors public input is meaningless and can be disregarded.
Applications 6 were heard plus one OSRA closure
Overall Comment on zoning applications: the council by means of body language and facial expression managed to convey to the members of the public present that public input is not welcomed nor is it being listened to. This reporter has never been more discouraged or disgusted in 4 years of attending meetings. They also demonstrated a complete disregard for the purposes behind zoning requirements of the waterfronts. They appear to have no interest in adhering to their own by-laws and other legal requirements.
South Muldrew Lake Cafferata
This vacant property is too small and according to the OP should not be built on unless all zoning requirements are adhered to. The applicant asked for 5 exemptions. The lake association and neighbours wrote requesting that most of the exemptions be denied, they were willing to see approval of the reduced setback from the water level. The applicant demonstrated no justification for the requests as the proposal is to build a new cottage, which means that creativity could solve the lot size problem. Council was disinterested during the delegation and Colhoun indicated that he expected the lake association to negotiate with applicants. Apparently this is not the town role even though the OP prohibits approval of this many exemptions and the town is legally responsible for the by-law. T.Pilger asked about a site plan approval, there is one from 2007 for a previous owner, and suggested that the 20 metre setback then approved then be adhered to. staff recommended approval Approved
Lake Muskoka Hicks
This odd shaped lot has many constraints. They asked for a reduced setback for a screened porch, habitable space, from 12.6 to 10.4 metres. Approved
Pine Lake Lee
This lot is far too small and as with Cafferata above should have stringent restrictions. The planner acknowledged this and asked for a site evaluation which proposed that development should be restricted to 20 metre setback with extensive conditions. The neighbours wrote to object to the application and impassioned delegations were heard. The neighbours have offered to buy the lot. Despite the site evaluation report the council approved a 19 metre setback.
Cairns wants to ensure that staff do follow up with site plan control, and Colhoun referenced the site evaluation report and then voted to further reduce the setback. The mayor acknowledged the applicant as a reliable builder who he knows from previous business contacts. Approved
Kilworthy Fisher
Has a 10 acre lot and wants permission to sever 2 acres. The severed lot will be rezoned to rural Approved. residential.
South end Plaza
The owners want to sever the property into 8 lots. They claim financing will be easier. Approved
Muskoka Bay Wuebbolt
He wants to build a garage 11.4 metres from the water. 1 neighbour objects, 1 supports and 1 asked via a lawyer for a deferral. This property has been before committee several times for boathouse approvals. There is a site plan agreement in effect and it does not include this garage. Council discussion as follows: Wilson, is the boat port removed yet? If not when?; Guerriero not happy, there is a request for deferral and wants to defer. He is concerned with the size of the garage, 3 car; T.Pilger is opposed to 11.4 metres. Cairns wants to visit the site. BPilger and Klinck opposed to Deferral
Comment: this application is a good example of the need for surveys being submitted. The rough drawing did not give a good picture of the size of the proposed garage. It also shows the power of using lawyers. Would it have been deferred without the veiled threat?
Kahshe Lake Erin Island Strenzel-Gibson
This is back from previous month. The staff were directed to ask applicant to reduce request. They will now remove stairs which have already been built and give up less than 3 square metres of shoreline development. Council is still not happy. Donaldson wants a deferral and to ask for more reduction. Deferred
Comment: all the items for exemption were built without approvals or permits. Why doesn’t council just tell them to remove it all and start over with the proper process. This was hinted at by the KLRA last month and would be a good object lesson for future applicants.
The other big item on the agenda was the draft 3 of the comprehensive zoning by-law.
After 2 public information meetings and individual meetings with members of the public the planners have identified several items where they want direction. Council was able to decide on a couple and not on others
Comment; the material presented was not available before the meeting so neither the council not the public had time to look at the questions and consider the issues. Although the public has had meetings with council members on some of these issues. And these items have been in public drafts to date.
The planners did not bring any facts into the discussion to guide the decision making. Several times reference was made to the budget pressures coming in the future. Does this mean councillors are finally understanding the nature of the debt legacy they have created. They now appear to think that this can be corrected by promoting bad waterfront development
The issues
· Washrooms in boathouses
Planner: boathouses are not to be used for habitation. Washrooms, if permitted, will lead to illegal habitation.
Cairns it will be too far for people to walk back to the cottage if washrooms are prohibited now that the setback is 30 metres. Boathouses often flood therefore put washrooms on the 2d floor.
TPilger allow a 2 piece only by restricting the square footage
Colhoun has no problem with washrooms. Terrain constraints make them necessary (even on level lots)
BPilger does this mean we grandfather existing ones
Guerriero they create pollution problems
Donaldson if there are terrain problems then use the variance process
Wilson there should not be washrooms in boathouses
On a vote only Guerriero, Donaldson and Wilson voted to ban washrooms.
Comment: the planners brought no data in to support the discussion. For example, the number of cottages built at the 30 metre setback. we would find very few. Those who previously voted for and favoured 2 storey and habitable boathouses are now confusing the issue with reference to the 30 metre setback. This is the use of a red herring to support bad planning on the part of those who favour development no matter what the consequences.
· Lot size
Planner: Gravenhurst has old plans of subdivision with lots which are considerably undersize as we now know what frontage and area is required to protect the health of the lakes. The existing provisions from zoning by-law 94-54 are being brought forward. Owners of these lots can ask for special provisions and amending by-laws.
During the consultation lot owners have asked that minimum lot sizes be reduced overall.
Minimal discussion and the decision was to leave it as is.
· Muskoka Beach area R3 zone
An individual landowner has asked that all setbacks in this area be reduced and that lot coverage be increased.
The OP specifies that this area should retain its existing character and that reduced setback and increased coverage would change it significantly.
Guerriero wants to see these options in writing and have a chance to ask questions.
TPilger feels the same
· Fish habitat
Should this be mapped in the by-law schedules.
Discussion is that this is a federal matter and that town should not do the mapping.
· Urban area lot sizes R1 zone
Planners have recommended reduced frontages to 35’ as a way of promoting intensification, Should these be reduced frontages be kept in the by-law?
Klinck thinks this should be considered except for lots on the waterfront.
Guerriero this will promote intensification.
Colhoun likes this as it will give builders the option for lower cost housing.
Comment: there are other ways of achieving intensification and these have been explained by professional planners from the associations to the town planner and consultants and to councillor Donaldson. Smaller lots have been approved in the past via subdivision agreements, by variances and with detailed conditions laid out. This change to 35’ lots has been opposed by residents who do not want the older areas of Gravenhurst to turn into streets of garages. As the by-law requires parking for 2 cars a 35’ lot will be mainly garage or asphalt on the street. There will be no room for driveways. In future the areas where this is done the town will look like the suburbs of the GTA.
· Wianko property on sparrow Lake.
This is an historic issue of commercial zoning on one property. Opposed by local residents.
· Expansion of non-conforming dwellings on waterfront lots.
The planners have proposed a sliding scale limiting size of expansions. Options presented are: leave things as they are whereby a building too close to the water can be expanded to multiple times its size all of which is too close to the water or Go with a sliding scale but let expansion adjacent to the water continue or expand only to the rear with no size constraint. The lakes have asked for limited expansion and preferably only to the rear.
Guerriero likes the current situation, unlimited expansion on all 3 sides
Colhoun agrees “we must stay competitive”
Klinck how about site plan control within the shoreline development area. It was explained to him that site plan control can only apply conditions which are in the by-law.
TPilger likes unlimited expansion only to the rear
Comment; this is a significant discussion as it will over time change the character of the lakes. If things are left as they are, the rebuilding of old smaller cottages into large cottages will further turn the lakes into subdivision like settings. This has consequences for all lakefront owners in Gravenhurst, about 50% of the taxpayers. Right now property values in Gravenhurst are lower than for similar properties on similar lakes in other municipalities, partly because Gravenhurst is losing its Muskoka character. But it is clear that the council wants to continue on their current course and is being driven by a predisposition to development and a desire for unrestricted building activity.
This and the small urban lot permissions discussed above will have great impact on our area and will reduce opportunities for economic development which utilizes the natural character of municipality.
· Bay Street commercial zoning
The proposal has been to rezone Bay Street down to the wharf as commercial which would allow arcades, commercial parking and other commercial uses. The Heritage committee requested that uses in this area be restricted so as preserve the character of the old houses, lawns etc.
Cairns while wanting to keep the character thinks commercial parking should be permitted.
Direction appears to be go with heritage committee request but keep commercial parking.
· Single detached dwellings in commercial zones
The expansion of commercial zones means that many existing residences will be non-conforming, They can retain their use but can they be expanded?
Answer from council is yes to enlargement, expansion or rebuilding.
EP zones
TPilger asked whether the EP zoning could be refined to have multiple zones with varying uses. Reply from planner is it could be done.
Follow up
Items which can be delegated to staff need identifying, Planners are to take the content of the discussion and bring a final draft back to council in March. Unresolved issues will come back to council in committee stage for discussion.
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Gravenhurst Council Notes February 16, 2010 without prejudice
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.
Mayor Klinck and Councillor Tracey Wilson were absent.
Deputations:
1. Danielle Millar updated Council on the Ontario Winter Games. The opening ceremonies will be held Mar. 4 at 7pm. Tickets are still available for the opening ceremonies.
2. Marg McLaughlin provided an update on the Gravenhurst Winter Carnival. A complete list of events is available on the Town website. The Committee is still looking for volunteers to help with the various events. If you are able to help out contact Amy Taylor at the Town office.
3. Rebecca Willison from the District of Muskoka gave an interesting presentation re Muskoka's Lake System Health Monitoring program. The full report is available on the District of Muskoka website. She showed results from 2009 and also the 2010 schedule of lakes to be tested.
4. Ross Ashforth presented the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association's 2010 budget observations. Comment: Why did Deputy Mayor Bob Colhoun not ask if council had any questions or comments re this presentation? This is generally the procedure and it is what happened with the three other deputations. A few questions were asked by councillors in the Corporate Services meeting.
Community Services
1. G8 Uptown Beautification Project Update Components that Community Services are responsible include new street furniture including waste & recycling containers, benches, bike poles, information kiosks, planters, baskets, banners, festive street lighting and flag pole. Purchase orders have been released for these.
2. Centennial Centre Expansion & Aquatic Facility Project Update The Decision Committee is meeting on a weekly basis. The planning is moving forward. The Centennial Centre will be closed to the public on Mar. 9 and will reopen for summer ice users. A preliminary budget and a construction schedule will be prepared and should come to council in early March. The Decision Committee has now met with the youth of Gravenhurst regarding the skate park.
3. Minutes of Building Committee meeting Jan. 15.
4. Minutes of Decision Committee meetings Jan. 22 & 28.
Public Works
1. G8 Uptown Beautification Project Update streetlight poles & fixtures as well s the retrofit L.E.D. Luminaires have been ordered and are being manufactured. The L.E.D. Retrofit bulbs and all of the luminaire fixtures are scheduled to be shipped on Feb.22 and arriving on the 24th or 25th. The streetlight poles will be shipped in two shipments on Mar. 8 & 15 with receipt on the 10th & 17th.
2. Amend Disabled Persons Parking By-law 2003-59 Trinity United Church requested the addition of a disabled parking space on the south side of Church St. east of Muskoka Rd., next to the existing space. The resolution was passed. This will be implemented in the spring when the snow is gone. The by-law amending by-law 2003-59 was passed at the Council meeting.
3. Minutes of Muskoka Wharf Board meetings Nov. 11, 2009 and Jan. 12, 2010.
Economic Development
1. Municipal Events Guidelines & Application Form Staff have been reviewing events scheduled and the execution of those events. Committee passed the resolution adopting the Municipal Events Guidelines and Application Form.
2. Community Economic Development Officer, Peter Rigby, gave an overview of activities of the Economic Development Dept. He also reported that Gravenhurst will be the host for the youth portion of the G8.
3. A public meeting was being held Feb. 16 at the Trillium Court regarding Highway 11. Terry Pilger brought forward concerns of the Economic Development Strategy Committee. He asked council to look at it so that it does not affect the Hwy 11 corridor businesses. Terry will bring a recommendation back to Council in the near future. Both Peter Rigby and Nick Popovich planned to attend the open house.
4. Minutes of the Economic Development Strategy Committee Jan. 12.
Corporate Services
1. Amend Burning Control By-law 2005-208 With the passing of the new ward boundaries, Chief Municipal Law Officer, Jim Wouters, brought forward a by-law to identify properties within the wards that were previously banned from burning, as well as close the gaps or loopholes in neighbourhoods that existed, and to add properties in built up areas that should be banned from burning. The proposed amendment will be advertised in the Banner on Feb. 24 and Mar. 3. Public comments are to be received by the Clerk by noon on Mar. 8. Public comments will be reviewed and the by-law will come back on Mar. 16 for consideration.
2. Amend Dog Control By-law 87-183 This is a similar situation to the burning by-law. The amendment will recognize the new ward boundaries and redefine the area where the maximum numbers of dogs kept is two per household. Any household being moved from a 3 dog limit to a 2 dog limit will have the third dog grandfathered which will allow the dog to stay until its death or it is given away. The proposed amendment will also recognize and define Service & Therapy Dogs.. The proposed amendment will also increase the annual dog licensing in all categories. Proposed annual licensing fees are: Per Male Dog $25; Per Female Dog $25; Per Dog owned by person 65 or over $20; spayed or neutered dog $15; kennel $75; service dog and dog owned by a police force no charge. Proposed amendment will be advertised the same as the Burning Control By-law and returned to Council on Mar. 16.
3. Opera House Online Ticketing System & Website Brad Rundle reported the online ticketing system has been implemented and the Gravenhurst Opera House website is up and running and will evolve over time.
4. Minutes Gravenhurst Accessibility Committee meetings Nov. 19 and Dec. 19/09
5. Minutes Library Board Dec. 9/09
6. Draft Budget Update Staff continue to review their budget areas and identified the following amendments Fire Department (210.999) increase of $37.644 to reflect staffing complement approved in 2009; Economic Development (821.999) decrease of $5,636 -minor changes made to reflect program needs; Community Services (700.999) decrease of $60,000 transfer to reserves no longer requested; Community Services (700.999) decrease of $32,646 amended to reflect staffing request for Parks/Centennial Centre; Parks (711.999) increase of $24,687- reflects the allocation of proposed staffing allocated in other areas; Centennial Centre (712.999) decrease of $12, 237 reflects the requested staffing proposal. The total change was a decrease of $48,189. Committee members asked some questions, particularly as related to the GGRA submission, and complimented Councillor Guerriero and the Treasury Department on the format and clarity of the document. Councillor Bob Colhoun felt there were areas they could still reduce and that staffing is one of them. After much discussion committee decided not to move forward with requests for Community Services request for the addition of a full time Parks and Arena Operations Foreman; By-law request for reduction of part-time staffing and the addition of a full time By-law Enforcement Officer they will keep the 2 summer students instead; Public Works/Wharf they had requested moving 5 contract public works/wharf operators to full time positions the one contract position that is up in July will be converted to a full time position and the other 4 will be kept on contract until the end of the contract positions and will be re-evaluated at that time. Staff and council will continue to look at the budget and evaluate other areas. Councillor Colhoun requested a report from the Fire Department as to what tuck is being replaced and could it be refurbished. Councillor Terry Pilger this they should reconsider computers for council members the District councillors will be provided computers by the District and $9000 was included in the budget for the town councillors. Councillor Paisley Donaldson wondered why there was nothing in the budget for the Opera House. Councillor Terry Pilger asked what happens to unused budget money. Treasurer Ken Watson explained that any surpluses are allocated to the general capital reserves.
Council Meeting
Council passed two by-laws: To deem part of a registered plan not to be registered (Jescan Poser Inc.) as well as the by-law amending the disabled parking by-law.
Council went into closed session.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Gravenhurst Council Notes February 2, 2010 without prejudice
Overall Comment:
The major item on the agenda was the draft budget for 2010. This is the first presentation of staff recommendations for new staff and additional spending. The draft is showing a requested 10.26% increase over the 2009 approved budget or a 12.9% increase over actual 2009 expenditures. Is this sustainable for you the taxpayer? If you are concerned, this is the time for you to write and ask the council to hold the line on spending increases, and no new staff. The GGRA submission in November asked for a 0 increase in spending and taxation and no new staff until they review the current efficiency and effectiveness of the town administration.
The budget: this was tabled for information purposes only. The mayor asked questions to ensure that staff had a chance to speak to the requests for 7 additional staff plus seasonal employees.
The schedule for the budget is as follows: February 16 the public will have a chance for deputations and council will discuss the budget themselves. Then March 2 the budget will be presented and presumably approved.
The cost pressures are debt servicing and staff wage increases. The total wage increase projected is 9%. (this does not mean that an individual staff person is getting a 9% increase. It means that the total bill will go up by this amount for raises, changes in level of jobs, promotions, and new staff.) The loss of revenue, from the landfill sale, from rents and from lower building permit revenue increases the costs to the taxpayers. This is compounded by increased debenture payments for the proposed town hall and salary raises for staff. In addition they are projecting that tax penalty income will rise by 90 thousand dollars a year. There will also be a 3% increase in fees and charges. The total expenditure is projected to be over 11 million dollars. Of this over 8 million will have to come from the taxpayers. The only significant increase in income is for tax penalties and arrears. This is based on an acknowledged “difficult” economic environment and more people having trouble meeting their tax obligations. Transfers from the reserves to operations will be down 152 thousand dollars. Note that the town budget is only 1/3 of the cost of taxes. The District component is unknown. `
Comment: the information package for the budget improves every year in terms of clarity. We have more understanding of where the money goes. But it does not improve in terms of the numbers themselves. The budget shows considerable pressures from prior decisions, mainly the assumption of debt plus past staff increases and wage settlements. This will only get worse as time passes because what is not included in this budget is the financing that will occur this year for the infrastructure and the new municipal office, another 2.9 million, and then even more in 2011 when the enlarged centennial centre and pool which will entail interest and principle on a further 6 million. Further the pool operating costs will mean and additional annual deficit in operations of at least 200 thousand. Calculating the costs of interest and principle on these new debts in 2011 the town will be facing debt servicing cost of approximately 1.69 million dollars a year (this is 21% of this years tax revenue), without taking into account the maintenance of services already being provided. It is important to note that staff salaries comprise almost 50% of expenditure. This base cost goes up every year and is very difficult to constrain. That is why adding 7 new staff will only make future year problems proportionately worse.
Again you are urged to speak up; it’s your money.
Muskoka Road Streetscape improvements. Approval was given for the tenders for street banners and street furniture and display units. All will be funded from the Federal grant announced last year.
Centennial Centre expansion and aquatic centre. This project will mean the closure of the arena. Groups currently renting space and time will be relocating. Temporarily. They will have their rental costs kept the same if they are using other town facilities. The committee for the expansion project met and as of January 7th was projecting a 500 thousand dollar increase in project costs. They are still grappling with design issues. Council discussion was about the signage for the centennial centre. Can it be made more visible?
Comment: projected cost increases at this early stage are of concern. The design has already been reduced because of too low cost projections last year. We need to monitor to see how well the budget can be adhered to.
Fee waivers Two requests for fee waivers for planning matters were presented. Staff recommended against the waivers. One was turned down the other approved. Discussion on the first was minimal. On the second application from a church the mayor spoke in favour of the request on the basis that the congregation is small and this would set a valuable precedent for other churches requiring assistance. He feels that churches provide services to the community and deserve consideration. T.Pilger pointed out that churches already receive assistance as they pay no property taxes (this is a Provincial decision) and this could be a dangerous precedent. Clairmont talked around the issue and wants to see this as a one off. Colhoun pointed out that this is $38 per congregant, but supports the mayor. There was a recorded vote and only Terry and Brian Pilger voted against the fee waiver.
Comment this is a dangerous precedent. Should the local taxpayer be funding religious institutions? Even if only by way of waiving legally imposed costs. Where does this stop? The mayor and Clairmont are clearly in a vote getting mood. The implications of this precedent on the taxpayer is troubling. Congratulations to both Pilgers for standing up for restraint and understanding the dangers in this decision. This is taking the municipality out of its jurisdictional sphere as did the earlier decision to fund medical consolidation. Consequences long term could be severe.
The Heritage and Environment committees reported. Heritage has taken on a significant work plan for 2010.
The progress on the strategic plan was reported. The mayor acknowledged that significant areas are missing: downtown revitalization (should we say survival?) and the Muskoka centre. TPilger pointed out that the provision of service industrial land is needed. He asked why if the fire department is meeting with an architect that there are no dollars in the budget. He also asked about the roads update. The treasurer acknowledged that the infrastructure deficit for the town is growing.
Comment the treasurer rightly alluded to the fact that the roads and bridges are deteriorating and are in worse condition. Instead of spending to address this problem the council has decided to mortgage the town for new offices. Which contributes most to the citizens?
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Gravenhurst Council Notes Planning Council January 26, 2010 without prejudice
The meeting is known as planning council as matters before it primarily relate to land use planning matters. There were 3 planning matters, one OSRA closure and one resolution to request a $4,000 grant for painting the Barge. The agenda showed 5 applications, however a clerical error gave the wrong location to applicants and those notified as to the location of the meeting. These 2 were deferred until next month
Overall comment:
Once again we see applicants who build illegally and then want forgiveness for the structure built even though they far exceed ‘minor” in breaking the town laws. Staff take a very very lenient approach to these situations and when pressed hedge their recommendations to council. There is a lot of backtracking. This reporter wonders where the direction is coming from?.
The applications
Kahshe Lake Strenzel-Gibson
They own a lot on Erin island and have gone ahead and built a sleeping cabin and decks and other structures without approvals. They now want these regularized through this rezoning and special provisions process. Staff want some portions of the illegal structures removes, but nor the significant items such as a large deck extension. Not only are they going too close to the lake, but there is no vegetative buffer between the buildings and the lake. Therefore the buildings are visually very intrusive. The KLRA does not support the application as it is outside both the OP and zoning rules but also contravenes the kahshe lake plan. Councillor comments: Donaldson referred to the KLRA letter and asked staff what they would do if the illegal building had not occurred. (The response was very weak and hedged) Colhoun feels that more illegal structures should be removed than staff recommend. Guerriero feels this way too. T.Pilger asked if the sleeping cabin could be moved back from the water. A second accessory building is labeled storage, but the windows have curtains and they want a deck on the building.
Staff was directed to work with the applicant to identify needed changes. Deferred
Comment: the councillors finally seem to be taking the rules seriously and seem to want them enforced. I hope this continues. With one exception the comments were directed to the by-law requirements and lake needs. The exception was Clairmont who asked why worry about setbacks when, being on an island, there is separation from the neighbours by the lake so they will not be impacted. He clearly understands neither the zoning by-law nor OP nor does he understand the need to protect the lake health and character. He also apparently did not listen to the input from the KLRA.
Kahshe lake O’Brien
If you recognize this name it is because the application first heard last July is back. When the severance was approved last year the deficient frontage on this lot was missed. Instead of 120 metres the frontage is now 72 metres. This is an old property with multiple buildings and the applications have been cleaning the mess up Approved
Muldrew Lake Cafferata
This was deferred because of the address mix up. This application has been acknowledged as having considerable correspondence from the MLCA and neighbours. The applicant is asking for multiple variances. Despite the unanimous negative comment from the community the staff said they will recommend approval.
Lake Muskoka Lakeshore Drive Clark
A very minor matter. A corner of a backlot will be severed and attached to the adjacent waterfront lot because of an encroachment. Approved
Lake Muskoka Lawland Heights Hicks
As with Cafferata this was deferred because of wrong address.
An update was provided on the zoning by-law. Draft 3 is now available. The public meeting will be at 5:00 Pm February 9th at the Opera House.
The council approved requesting $4,000 from the Community foundations of Canada to paint the Barge.
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website.
Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association
Council Notes January 19, 2010 Without Prejudice
Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.
Council met in closed session regarding personal information pertaining to an identifiable individual – no resolutions. Mayor Klinck was away.
Deputations:
Two deputations were heard. Robert Clement of the Royal Canadian Legion was asking for a building permit refund. The Legion applied for and was granted an accessibility grant for $31,500 to provide a wheel chair lift for the downstairs of the Legion and automatic doors for upstairs. The building permit costs were $300. A resolution was passed at council to refund the permit fee.
Nancy Beal spoke on behalf of a group who want a Dog Park in town. The group has met with Deborah Broderick and also the Wharf Board. They have identified potential sites and are scheduled to meet with By-law officer Jim Wouters. They were asking for support in principle. The group was advised to continue to work with Debbie Broderick and then she will bring forward a report.
Community Services
A preliminary budget and construction schedule are being prepared and will be provided to Committee soon.
Public Works
Development Services.
Widening the existing highway by means of a grassed median
Bypasses of sections of the existing Highway 11
Interchange alternatives
Service road connection alternatives
It is anticipated that the majority of properties located within the study area will be affected. The next stage in the process would be for the Ministry to hold Public Information session. They have indicated there will be three with the first one likely to be held in Feb.,2010 but as of yet staff have not heard of any specific date. Ministry reps indicated the new construction would likely occur between 2019 and 2033, depending upon the increase in traffic volumes using the corridor. There is no financial impact to the town at this time but there may be significant impacts upon the tax base of the Town in the future as the assessment base on Hwy 11south is substantial. Councillor Bob Colhoun feels there should be representatives of council at the meetings with the Ministry as well as staff and the town should be extremely cautious about what the Ministry is doing.
Economic Development Committee
Corporate Services
Council Meeting
Council Minutes Dec. 8 & 15, 2009 – Councillor Terry Pilger asked that resolution #316 of the Dec. 15 minutes re the proposed new municipal offices be removed & considered separately. This required a 2/3 majority vote to pull it out and discuss it. This was passed. Councillor Pilger felt that, because of questions received from the public, it was prudent to discuss it in a public procedure. He brought forward some of the questions that had been asked in emails and letters. Some comments from the councillors were: Paisley Donaldson feels a need to move forward to the new offices. She feels $1.9 million is too much and suggested that they cap the renovations at a certain figure. She is comfortable with the non tendering process ascouncil talked about the reasons for using the contractor on site. The contractor is doing a good job on the doctors' building. When they bought the building there was no hope of a pool. She wants to complete the move in this term of council. COMMENT – Councillor Donaldson did not seem to fully understand what council has done – she thought they would still be tendering the electrical work, etc. She was told this is not the case – they will be using the tradespeople already on site. Councillor Tracey Wilson agrees there is not room at the current building but thought a budget should be set. She asked “how do you know you saved $500,000 if you didn't go to tender? The CAO explained the $500 thousand in savings by quoting from the architect's letter and his explanation of the savings. Councillor Mark Clairmont hates the fact they are moving to the south end and worries it will affect the downtown. He says something else could go in the rest of the current building that will generate traffic downtown. COMMENT – I guess similar to the vacant Canadian Tire, Giant Tiger, IGA and Liquor Store buildings. He says council must look ahead and be forward thinking. He did say that the main task of the EDO should be assisting the downtown to fill the empty stores. Councillor Sandy Cairns expressed appreciation for the letters received. She feels Gravenhurst is in a much better predicament that Bracebridge – the municipal offices will be closer to our downtown. Bracebridge still has a vibrant downtown. We have a beautiful downtown which is and will remain vibrant. She feels the new streetscape program will help. She suggest council ask the BIA what else the town can do to help. The strategic plan identified the need to expand the town offices. The Fire Department's training office was built to be a truck bay. They have expressed a need for more space. COMMENT – Is there a report documenting the needs of the Fire Department? She feels the $1.9 million is too much money. Councillor Lou Guerriero said this started with the doctors. The town had the opportunity to buy the Health Unit Building, a $6 million building for $3.2 million. Should the medical presence disappear the town will own their new building. He feel the renovation pricing is in line, although the $1.9 million is tough to swallow. The current offices are cramped and there are accessibility issues. Councillor Bryan Pilger agrees the current facility is cramped and that the fire department needs more room but he is bothered by the nearly $2m renovation costs and the fact that they only have the word of 1 architect and 1 contractor. Councillor Terry Pilger emphasized that he is not saying that the municipal offices do not need to move but council is not following their own purchasing policy, although council can override it . If the minutes are passed “as is” council has no control and no budget. He questioned how many more people they can accommodate at the new building. The CAO replied that this depends on the square footage each new person would require. Councillor Pilger also asked who is going to manage the project and what is their incentive to keep costs down. The architect gets a percentage (8%) of construction costs. Councillor Bob Colhoun says there is lots of room to expand at the new building. He says it is a known fact that it is cheaper to uses forces already on the site. It is time consuming to go out to tender. The $1.9million includes the architect's fees. At a meeting the town was very explicit about making sure if there is any way possible to do it cheaper, do it. The architect is an honest man. If the project is done piecemeal it will cost more and will disrupt everyone. The $1.9 million is not going to change if you change the date of the move. A vote was taken approving this resolution to be part of the minutes. Councillors Bryan Pilger, Terry Pilger, and Wilson voted no. Councillors Cairns, Clairmont, Donaldson, and Guerriero voted yes. The minutes were adopted as circulated. COMMENT – STILL NO CONTROL, NO BUDGET AND NO DIRECTION FROM COUNCIL TO FIND COST SAVING MEASURES. THERE WAS AN OPPORTUNITY HERE FOR A RESOLUTION TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD AND COUNCILLORS FAILED TO TAKE IT.
New Business
Correspondence from Durham Region re: Ombudsman Act and Public Complaints re: Hospitals. They are seeking support with respect to amending the Ombudsman Act to authorize the Ombudsman to investigate public complaints about hospitals. Ontario remains the only province in Canada whose Ombudsman has no jurisdiction over hospitals. Council supports the resolution as received from the Town of Fort Erie. Staff will bring back a resolution for the next Council meeting.
Gravenhurst Council Meeting Notes Jan to Dec 2008 Click Here to go There Error
Gravenhurst Council Meeting Notes May To Dec 2007 Click Here to go There