GGRA.ca

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Council Notes        July 20, 2010                        without prejudice

 

Overall Comment:  2 significant items well worth watching:  the cost overrun on the arena and new aquatic centre project and the fire department expansion to take over the 9,500 square foot old city hall.  Both have budget and tax implications and reflect on political direction and management competence. 

Deputations

Airport                                   Filzmaier

At the July 6 meeting council recommended to District a 1 year extension of his 2 lot subdivision approval when he paid his fees.  This meeting he asked for 2 things, he wants the property conveyed back to him that he had sold to MTO for $1 because MTO thought they would need the access for building the new road to Prisons.  Approved by Council.  He is also looking for an extension of his sub-division development plan (originally issued 12 yrs. ago) Wanted a 2 yrs. extension and no fees.  District has already indicated they would not extend more than 4 months. Council decided it was a district matter. 

Muskoka Wharf Adventures

The operator of the water ski and wake board school at the Wharf wants to expand to Gull Lake park docks.  He notes that the park has many swimmers and he sees this as a market for his school.

Council responses were mixed:  Cairns, Guerriero, Colhoun and Clairmont led the cheerleading for the idea.   BPilger, TPilger and Klinck asked substantive questions – hours of operation, base location, timing.  Mayor Klinck strongly suggested that MWA not commence business in Gull Lake w/o consultation with D. Brodrick and Gull and Silver Lake Assoc. and that council would deal with issue in August meeting if follow through addressed.    

Centennial Centre expansion and new aquatic centre. 

Guerriero as chair of the committee for this project gave a long discursive background before getting to the issue at hand:  the costs are exceeding the budget.  They have changed the design, because of site problems  and have additional components to the plan and an increased contingency.  The net effect is 3.5 million dollars in more borrowing.   The unforeseeable costs were blamed on water table issues, storm management, and sewers, regulations of Building and fire code requirements and complexity of connecting to existing building.  All this was justified by the short timelines to prepare the grant request and discovery of the location of the storm sewer discharge and the high water table on the site. 

Council remarks:  Klinck asked about the timeline for completion – on schedule, that total additional needs are covered –other issues have been anticipated and the 500 thousand contingency should be enough, whether components could be dropped the YMCA has flexibility but town would loose significant program space and services to young families, and also indicated that he has talked informally with the senior levels and they are receptive but non-committal in their reaction.

TPilger:  how did we miss the high water table, the capacity of District sewers and the storm water discharge issues.  These excellent questions were answered with the excuse that initial cost estimates were rushed and no professional team was in place at the time of application.

Colhoun opined that the project was rushed and work accelerated.  Other levels don’t take this into account

Clairmont sees this as a catalyst for the community and he “would be prepared to double the (shortfall) borrowing” and then use the extra money so the next council has some funds available.   He then blamed the senior levels for their short deadlines.  “Keep up the good work”   He also asked what this means to the taxes.  This will mean a 21/2 to 3% increase in taxes.

Guerriero praised the architect and construction management firms.

Council approved going to the District to debenture the 3.5 million and also asking the senior levels of government to give some more money.

Comment:   the engineers who helped with the initial cost estimate were on site well before this project with an arena expansion project plan.  At that time they could not have failed to identify the structural deficiencies in the arena, assuming they were thorough.  Common sense would tell all of us that a 35 year old building no longer meets code standards.  Wasn’t this planned for?  And the District infrastructure is well mapped. 

It is not sufficient to blame senior levels of government.  They gave the full 2/3 of what the town submitted.  The responsibility is with the town staff and the consultants in 2009.

This raises the debt for the town to 30 million dollars.  To borrow and pay interest and principle on a million dollars causes approx a 1% tax increase, depending on the interest rate.  Together the arena/pool and new town hall projects  have just added 16.6 million dollars to the town debt, 16% increase in tax rate.  “keep up the good work”  

Communities in Bloom provided an update. 

The Volunteer awards program will have a new name “Community Spirit Awards” and committee.   Clairmont asked if seasonal residents are eligible.  Yes 

Pinetree Road bridge is being replaced this week. 

Highway 11     Camp Hillbilly 

A site plan agreement will be put into place. 

Audited Financial statement 2009

The auditors presented the audited financial statement for 2009.  The format is changed because the province has forced the municipalities to value their assets and give statements in a format similar to that which a private corporation would use.   .

Questions arose as to the method for valuing the assets   go back to costs and allow for depreciation.  Klinck used this item to congratulate the council on operating on a business basis and on an increase in assessment from 2000 to 2010 and then postulated that all property owners have more net worth as a result of this increase!      

Comment:   Much congratulatory patting of backs was seen as ratios of debt to equity and net financial position are low and the accumulated surplus is high.  But these result from accounting changes not real changes.  No one asked how meaningful these ratios and figures are in the context of a government institution.  No one asked questions about the real financial health of the town    The 2009 statement requires a sophisticated review.  We will ask a board member to review and comment and give context in the next timeframe.

 

Harvie Street Building

The deputy Fire Chief tabled a plan for the old city hall.  The space will be shared by the OPP, community policing office, and the fire department.  The Police will have for their use the current committee room and the councillors’ office.  The kitchen and washrooms and training room will be shared space.  The current council chamber will become the training room.  The rest of the space is for the Fire department – all 4 staff.  This is in effect the space of the 2 storey portion of the building, approx. 4,000+ square feet.  The plans shown were the building outline with typed in labels such as “winter or indoor training area”, “future washroom showers” etc.  Drawings were not signed, stamped or qualified in any way.    The District pays the town 8,300 for rental for the OPP.   Of course this now le   aves the current police office vacant.

The resolution to approve the plan and have an agreement with the OPP was approved with no votes against.

Comment:  this reporter found the situation disgraceful, no questions were asked as to what the operating costs will be nor did they ask about renovation costs, nor why 4 staff need the space now occupied by 15 or more staff and reception plus the upstairs space.  It is decision irresponsibility made evident.    There was no discussion from councillors as to whether the proposed layout and expectations met bldg. codes or if it had been inspected regarding proposals.   The absence of questions raises 2 questions:  whether the councillors met beforehand to see the plans, this contravenes the requirement for public discussion, or else they are negligent in protecting the taxpayers.    

A brush and forest fire fighting agreement will be entered into with MNR.  

2d quarter financial reports were tabled for all departments.  No questions. 

Committee reports – Communities in Bloom and the arena/pool decision committee 

 

            Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website. 

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Council Notes        July 6, 2010          without prejudice 

 

Overall Comment:  a short and uneventful meeting.  The most interesting items; additional renovation cost for energy efficient lighting in new town offices.  

Kyla Bruce of community services received a certificate and praise from Council. 

July 30 and 31st the Roots Amateur Wakeboard Tour will be held on Gull Lake.  There will be a wakeboard clinic and competitions for youth.  They have a noise exemption. 

4 new handicapped spaces will be implemented. 

Kahshe Lake   an OSRA and unopened road allowance will be closed and sold to the adjacent landowner., Norman Page, who donated a waterfront cranberry marsh to the Muskoka heritage Trust. 

Airport  an industrial subdivision adjacent to the airport will receive a 12 month extension to the original draft approval of 1992.  The fee is to be paid.

TPilger asked whether in the past 18 years requirements for such a subdivision have changed.  Yes, environmental screening and hydrogeological studies would now be required.

Clairmont asked what happens in 12 months?  And what happens if he meets the conditions of the draft approval.   He reapplies and if he meets the conditions he can go ahead. 

Visitor information statistics for June were tabled.  Good response and people like the maps. 

A new citizen member of the Highway 11 Committee was appointed. Brian Otis. 

Kilworthy Fire station – the well has now been tested and has very low salt levels.  (Remember this past winter the replacement fire truck was approved as the old one rusted out before the end of its scheduled life.  At that time the saltiness of the well, no testing, was blamed.)

Colhoun wondered if the premature rusting of the fire truck was because of poor design or poor maintenance.  He also mentioned that the water is not potable so the station cannot be used as an election polling station.

The mayor asked staff to obtain a risk assessment from Public Health re the water potability. 

New town offices.  The renovation continues and Council approved an additional $21,000 for a retrofit to the lighting system for greater efficiency.  The estimated payback is 18 months.

TPilger is this in addition to the current approved 1.9 million?  Yes

Clairmont – clarify the payback.  Range 6 to 36 months, for us 18 months.

TPilger do we know the current status of the renovation costs.  Not specifically,  but we are on track and still within the budgeted amount.

Comment:  energy efficiency was not part of the specs for the renovation, so this is an additional cost.  But given the payback it is worth doing.   In 2010 how can the concept of energy efficiency be ignored in specs?   

Ryde C-op

The Public Health unit has done a risk assessment on the water for the building and it is unsafe.  Right now the co-op users supply potable water for consumption and the building water is only used for cleaning and toilets.  This is not acceptable to the PH unit. 

BPilger, people do not drink the water.  Is PH aware of this.  That is irrelevant since food is served.

TPilger, there is a drilled well at the adjacent fire hall.  Could that water be connected?  Mayor, we have no choice we should proceed.  Since the buildings have different owners connection of infrastructure is problematic.

Guerriero can the proposed system handle the volume.  Yes 

Committee Minutes reported

The Wharf board , Environmental Advisory Committee, Accessibility Advisory Committee, Public Library board  

            Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website.   

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Council Notes        June 22, 2010          without prejudice 

 

This meeting is called the planning council because the matters being considered are planning matters.  The meeting had 7 applications for rezoning, and one carryover. One application was withdrawn . 

Overall comment:   the applications part of the meeting was public with opportunity for the public to speak.  And speak they did to the Mongeau application on Muskoka Bay for 29 town houses, where a maximum of 8 is permitted.  The council chamber was packed, many eloquent speeches were made and council rejected the application.   Numbers count. 

Overall Comment on zoning applications:  the council speedily passed 6 of the 7 applications as there was minimal public comment    They continue to allow people to advance their buildings towards the water within the riparian zone of 20 metres.  This has a cumulative impact on lake health as this land is important for absorbing nutrients and pollution.  Buildings make the problem worse by removing soil and creating storm water runoff.   This is the purpose for the zoning requirements on the waterfronts.    

Carryover application.

North Muldrew Lake    Reilly

They are enclosing their deck and building another one in front of the cottage towards the lake.  This means they reduce the setback from 17.8 metres to 13.5 metres.  See my comment above re the riparian zone protection.      Approved 

New applications

Muskoka Bay          Mongeau

This property is on North Street and fronts the bay just west of the wharf.  The frontage would allow for 8 lots to be created.  The applicant requested permission for 29 multiple unit dwellings.  The application is a major variance to the official plan and the zoning by-law and this was pointed out by the public.  The issues raised were environmental, destruction of the natural character of the site,density, traffic impacts, destruction of a peaceful family neighbourhood, impact on the water quality, character of the Bay being ruined, impact on adjacent property values.  Most speakers reminded the council of the Official plan and its wording to protect the environment and character of the town.  The planner recommended deferral for more studies.  Colhoun moved for deferral.  He was unable to get a seconder for his motion.  Donaldson, Cairns, T.Pilger, Guerriero, Clairmont spoke in opposition.       Denied

 

Bethune Drive         Cooper

Application to sever his property and rezone the new lot on Simpson road to rural residential                                                                       Approved 

Beiers Road             Thomson

Rezoning to permit the existing dwelling to be converted into a retail store.      Approved 

Muskoka Bay Golf course     Muskoka Bay villas

Request to waive minimum lot area, frontage and coverage requirements to be able to build 4 plex units on one of the previously approved parcels alongside the golf course.  Guerriero asked about the outstanding work still to be done on North Muldrew Lake road, an asphalt lift and sidewalks.  Wilson wanted to know the size of the units – 800 to 1700 square feet, Clairmont sought clarity as to building type proposed and wanted to know if this would be affordable housing at these sizes.                                              Approved 

Muskoka Road South

The house at the corner of Veterans Way is now a group home which exceeds legal capacity.  The owner wants to add to the rear 2d floor of the building to allow for 10 residents.  Parking requirements are reduced.  The trees at the front of the house have come down.  The site plan will require replanting.  Approved         

Severn River                        Thom

The large frontage on the river is being severed into 6 lots.  The area has species at risk and environmentally sensitive wetlands.  A study has identified building envelopes.  Specific areas are being rezoned EP.                   Approved   

            Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

 

Gravenhurst Council Notes        June 15, 2010                      without prejudice

 

Overall Comment:  an uneventful meeting.  The most interesting items were the report from the Watershed Council, the Economic Development Strategy and the costs of the debt incurred by the town for the new town hall. 

 Deputations 

A cheque for $3,500 from Benjamin Moore was given for repainting the barge.

One Kids Place requested a fee waiver for use of the youth centre every Wednesday to provide assessments and speech therapy for young childrenTPilger asked if this conflicts with other programming – no, Clairmont asked what occurs, Colhoun asked about numbers served.                   Approved

Nurse Practitioners want to establish a clinic for mental health care.  They requested support for their application and assistance with locating space.  The mayor put forward the idea of them leasing the empty space in the town owned doctors building on Muskoka Road South.  They will talk further with the town staff.

Habitat for Humanity gave an overview of the organization.  They want to do a build in Gravenhurst in 2011.  TPilger praised H4H and Clairmont asked about rental rates.  They are higher here in Muskoka than further south.

 

Watershed Council Report Card  The 2010 report card was presented.  It is available from www.muskokaheritage.org     It measures the health of the physical environment of muskoka

The report card looks a how Muskoka is doing when measured against established scales: for water what %age of the lakes and Bays are over threshold, the amount of mercury, and riparian habitat (the edge of the water and 20 metres back from the shore), for land the %age of natural cover, the %age of large undisturbed forest, the %age of interior forest, and finally at the amount and size of managed and protected areas.    For Gravenhurst we have some major challenges and do not rate well on the Lake Muskoka subwatershed.  There is old development with too many small lots, there is loss of riparian zones and a damaging fragmentation of the watershed by roads.  The presentation stressed the importance of riparian zones.     TPilger asked about forest cover in Gravenhurst.  Guerriero praised the councils work and asked about Muskoka Bay.  He sees it as an asset and asked about its status and should we be concerned about development.  The response indicated that nutrient loading is improving as the major negative stressors have been removed.  But there are still storm water and other issues.  Clairmont didn’t understand the established scales.  Cairns feels that planning staff give good support and hopes council understands how important this is.  She then gave a Communities in Bloom promo.

Comment:  the report card does not rank the Muskoka Lake watershed well.  We can only hope that the council listens to the message about protecting the riparian zones, not fragmenting the landscape and not approving small  lots and high densities on Muskoka Bay.    Also the management of storm waterneeds to ber addressed by public works and planning.

 

An OSRA closure on Sparrow lake was approved. 

Ongoing minutae

Leases:          The town approved leases for the train station operation, the taxi office at the train station, the snack bar at gull lake park operation. 

Committees:             The minutes of the centennial expansion centre committee, the Environmental Advisory Committee and the Heritage Advisory committee were tabled.    The BIA will add 2 members at large as will the Highway 11 committee.

The policies regarding workplace violence and harassment were approved, a new stop sign for Pineridge Gate and Hedgewood Lane was approved, parking restrictions were added to 4 more areas, and Banners will be added at the wharf using the G8 money. (There is a 200 thousand dollar surplus which will go back to Ottawa). 

 

Economic Development   The EDO strategy report was tabled.    12 possible economic development items were identified.  They are:   development of visitor information services, response to proposed changes to Highway 11, general preparedness, creation of an ED website, tourism and ED marketing, retail attraction program, business attraction program, re-development of the façade improvement program, a centre of excellence for tourism and hospitality, china tourism marketing, development of industrial land and re-development of the Muskoka Centre property.

Discussion:    Cairns praised the current website video, the idea of a retail attraction program – we need kids clothing and shoes - and the façade improvement idea. 

Guerriero wants to know what is the vision behind the list.   He argued that without a vision there is no direction, no meaningful way to set priorities and be proactive.  Clairmont agrees with this but can a vision be developed?  We are a multifaceted community and cannot predict the future.  We have 50,000 square feet of empty retail space and should be looking for retail businesses.

Comment:    most of the list of activities is not strategic, it is a list of things to be done to keep businesses in town and perhaps add more and a reaction to outside decisions.  It is mainly staff work.  The work required to achieve the items on list is significant and in the 4 years of this council things have gotten worse rather than better.  For example it is a bit late for Clairmont to be concerned about 50,000 square feet of empty retail space.  It is mostly the result of the development of the south end plaza and he cheerled that initiative along with others on the council.  Guerriero is right about the need for a vision.  Again he has been on council for 7 years.  Why is this need for a vision coming now?    Less talk, more action and performance are needed.   The public must keep a close watch on the progress on these items.  They are vital for the town economy, to keep and grow.  The most important items, façade – the Bia will press this one- and the Centre of Excellence and the Muskoka Centre need good broad community involvement and watching.    

 

Debentures.  By-laws to debenture 2.9  million were approved.   The money is for the new municipal offices and the cost overrun on the medical centre servicing.   A twenty year term is proposed at 4.63%.  This will increase taxes by 2.8% every year for the next 20 years.    TPilger asked if the renovation cost for the municipal offices is really 1.9 million as it was supposed to be less.  He was not answered.

Comment:  the CAO was sitting at the head table.  Why was councillor Pilger not given an answer?  And why did he not press further.   Keep posted on the costs.  Any bets?

 

Zoning by-law

A report on the appeals was tabled and the solicitor to represent the town was approved.  The report recommends discussion with the appellants and the planner feels that most issues can be resolved without going to the OMB.

Paisley Donaldson and Lou Guerriero will represent the town in discussion with the lake associations about their appeal to uncontrolled re-development on the waterfront.   The council position is that they will discuss with appellants, but that they still support the by-law as passed. 

            Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website. 

 

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Council Notes                        June 1, 2010       Without Prejudice

 

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability. 

This meeting covered routine matters. 

Deputations:

1.      Doug Wallis reported on the 2010 Gravenhurst Winter Carnival.  The event was very successful and realized a profit. They were able to give back to the community by making a donation to the Gravenhurst Opera House Star Quest.  The 2011 Winter Carnival will be held on Feb. 25, 26, and 27.

2.      Three deputation were made regarding a proposed land exchange on Tomingas Rd.  Tomingas Road traverses property owned by the Brays and they are proposing to convey the Tomingas road encroachment property to the Town of Gravenhurst in exchange for a portion of the Town owned unopened road allowance abutting their property.  John Duck spoke on behalf of the Gilberts who own the property to the east and use a portion of the unopened road allowance to access their property.  Rick McCann spoke on behalf of the Brays who are prepared to grant a right-of-way to the Gilberts.  The Gilbert's driveway encroaches upon the Bray property as well as crosses the unopened road allowance. David Berny, the Gilberts lawyer, also spoke.   

Community Services

1.      Committee passed a resolution accepting the proposal from Cottage County Communications to produce the 2010-2011 Fall & Winter and 2011 Spring & Summer Recreation and Leisure Guides.

2.      Committee passed a resolution including the metal plant stand at the Berlet property (White Pine Parkette) in their 2010 watering schedule.  Sander Motors supplies the water truck that the Town uses to water the hanging baskets, containers and garden sites.  This year Town staff will be performing the watering.  The Berlet property will add approximately 45 minutes to the watering program. It is estimated that the town will be watering once every 6 days depending on the weather.  Volunteers will water the Berlet property on the other days. 

Public Works

1.      Committee passed a resolution to provide $5000 in funding to the Muskoka Heritage Foundation for planting along the Muskoka Wharf Boardwalk.  The area selected this year will be a continuation of last year's vitalization.  The money will come from the Wharf operational budget. The tentative date for planting is June 19 

Development Services.

1.  Land Exchange Application – Bray.  In 2004 a group application was submitted by the owner of the Bray property and the owner at that time of the Gilbert property to close the original shore road allowance in the front of their properties.  A survey revealed that a portion of the traveled part of Tomingas Road traversed the backlot portion of their respective properties.  In 2005 the owners of the Gilbert property acquired the OSRA and part of the Tomingas Rd. unopened road allowance in exchange for a portion of their property containing the raod encroachment.  The owner of the Bray property was not involved in the land exchange and paid the full fee to purchase the OSRA.  In 2009 the Brays submitted a proposal to receive a portion of the Town owned unopened road allowance in exchange for a section of their property containing the Tomingas Road encroachment.  Staff presented three options to Committee.  Committee voted to defer in order to give the affected parties a chance to sit down with staff and come up with a solution agreeable to all parties.

2.  Comprehensive Zoning By-law appeals received – Staff outlined appeals filed that met the deadline for appeals.  Twelve have been filed – the majority are site specific. Staff feel that most can be settled in the pre-hearing process.  A further report will be brought forward in two weeks.  The appeals are:

    1)  Muldrew Lake Cottagers Association – expansion of existing shoreline dwellings.

    2)  Duke & George Restorations – site specific (Three Mile Lake)

    3)  Judith Godfrey – site specific (Three Mile Lake)

    4)  Sheldon Godfrey – site specific (Three Mile Lake)

    5)  Kempenfeldt Theatre Productions Ltd – site specific (Three Mile Lake)

    6)  Kahshe Lake Ratepayers Assoc. - expansion of existing shoreline dwellings.

    7)  Brian Ferguson – site specific (Lake Muskoka)

    8)  Kauffman, Burns, Gavendo, Sparrow Lake Ass. - site specific (Wiancko House)

    9)  Bell – site specific (Kahshe Lake)

   10) Robert List – entire set of schedules

   11) Patlyn Company Limited – site specific (Lantern Marina lands)

   12)  Joseph & Karen Donohue – site specific (Shamrock Marina lands) 

Economic Development

 

1.      Terms of Reference for the Establishment of a Highway 11 Committee – Staff presented Terms Reference for a Committee to address the issues related to the options that the MTO is considering to improve the section of the Highway 11 corridor from Washago to the south entrance to Gravenhurst.  The role of the Highway 11 committee is to prepare, for approval of Council, a response to the proposed study of Feb., 2010.  The objective of the response is to identify the potential economic and personal impact to individuals and business located along that stretch as well as impacts on the Town and District.  The study is to include, but not be limited to:  1)  Impact on property values; 2) Impact on possible sale of property; 3) Loss of employment; 4) Loss or retail sales; 5) Impact of assessment values and subsequent loss of property taxes; 6)  Forced closure of active businesses; 7) Disruption & negative impact on quiet enjoyment and personal lifestyle; 8) Cost of downloading of current sections of Provincial Highway to lower tier municipalities; 9) Potential affect on historical properties and 10) Environmental issues created by the continued development or relocation of Highway 11. Names put forward for the Committee were: Council – Terry Pilger; Staff – Peter Rigby, Nick Popovich and Ken Watson; and Citizens – Jay Mothersill, Jodi Holder, Michael Lawley and Stuart Morley.  Councillor Bob Colhoun was concerned that there was not more representation from the Highway 11 businesses.  Peter Rigby pointed out that the Committee Structure allows for no less than 4 and nor more than 6 members from the community at large and that Associate Members (non voting)  can be recruited to help with any project or subcommittee.   The resolution was amended to include two additional members of the Highway 11 corridor.  The resolution approved the Terms of Reference as well as appointing the named members and was passed. 

Corporate Services

1.      Compliance Audit Committee – On March 2, 2010 Council passed a resolution to accept in principle the concept of a Muskoka Wide Compliance Audit Committee. This Committee would deal with applications for compliance audits of candidates' 2010 municipal election campaign finances and any by-election campaign finances during the 2010 to 2014 Council term.  The Committee will be comprised of 3 members of the public with the provision for 1 alternate member. Their term of appointment is consistent with each term of council. The remuneration is a per diem rate of $125 per meeting and mileage of $0.41 per kilometre.  Committee passed a resolution endorsing the Terms of Reference for the Muskoka Compliance Audit Committee.

2.      Bill 168- An Act to Amend the Occupation Health & Safety Act with Respect to Violence and Harassment in the Workplace – Staff presented a report for information and comment.  The amendments of the Act come into effect June 15, 2010.  At that time all workplaces in Ontario with 5 or more employees will be required to have the necessary policies, program & Procedures posted and in place.  Training must be provided to all employees, elected officials , local boards and committees and volunteers.  The policies will deal with violence in the workplace, harassment and domestic violence.  The policies lay out what the Town will do and how they will do it.  The town will have something in place for the June 15 deadline.

3.      Library Board minutes Apr. 14. 

Council was routine matters.  Council then went into closed session to deal with matters about identifiable individuals. 

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Council Notes                        May 27, 2010       Without Prejudice

 This meeting is called the Planning Council because the matters being considered are planning matters.   

Overall comment:   the 3 applications all wanted to enlarge their principle residences towards the lake thereby lessening already deficient setbacks.     Only one of the three involved no terrain change or further loss of vegetation.  The planner’s reports indicated that setbacks have the purpose of protecting the health of the lakes and the character of the shorelines.    council did not ask how the proposals addressed these fundamental mandated requirements.     Also where decks are to be enclosed it was never answered if these were legal.  Under the new by-law any components to be utilized in the change must be legal. 

Applications  3 were heard plus 12 OSRA closure 

 Lake Muskoka, Taylor island                 Basilij                         Approved

They are requesting a 400 square foot room to be added at the side, plus they want to enlarge an existing deck closer to the water.   The planner indicated that there is plenty of room on the lot to expand elsewhere away from the lake.   Nevertheless approval was recommended.   Colhoun asked what will happen to an existing holding tank.  It will be moved.  No questions were asked about why the cottage could not be enlarged away from the lake.   

North Muldrew Lake                                  Reilly                                      Deferred

Here again the applicant wants to enlarge a cottage and move closer to the lake.  The intention: enclose an existing deck and build another deck even closer to the lake in front of the newly enclosed area.   The planner supported enclosing the existing deck but opposed the new deck.  The plan submitted was inaccurate so was amended in the meeting.  Councillor Wilson wanted to know the age of the existing deck.  This was not answered.  Colhoun wanted to know if revised drawing changes affected planner’s initial recommendation.  No.  But then confusion; will vegetation would be affected.  The confusion led councillor TPilger to ask for a deferral so that questions about tree preservation could be answered. 

Lake Muskoka, Taylor island                  Diedrick                                Approved

The applicant wants to enclose the area under an existing deck thereby bringing the habitable space closer to the lake.  this is the one application which does not change the vegetation or run off or other factors which affect the lake.  no questions were asked.  

            Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website. 

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Council Notes                        April 20, 2010       Without Prejudice

  

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability. 

Council met in closed session at 2pm re 3 items under Personal Matters About an Individual plus a legal matter and property acquisition/disposition.  The property matter was to relist the Doctors' Building on Muskoka Rd. S.  Councillor Terry Pilger declared a pecuniary interest re the property matter.

 

Deputations

1.      Robbie Irvine spoke on behalf of the Blue Skies Network re the White Pine Parkette. She updated Council re plans for this year.  The Blue Skies are again seeking donations from the public re sponsorship of plants for the “tree”.  They also asked the Town to consider watering the flowers once a week, since staff have been hired for watering and also asked if a garbage bin and bicycle stand could be placed near the parkette.

2.      Brandon McGregor updated Council re BIA activities and explained the budget for this year.  The BIA has partnered with the Chamber of Commerce and this year's Fashion Show was the most successful to date.

3.      Evelyn Matson & Al Denne presented on behalf of the Transportation Committee.  They updated Council on the Committee's activities.  They would like to have a system in place for the summer months, beginning on Wednesday June 30th.  Costs to establish and run for the summer months would include, operational cots, and initial start up fees which would amount to approximately $22,00 to $24,000.  They were asking for support to apply for funding from “Futures” for $5,000; for permission to pursue a professional transportation report if funded by Government funds and asking for Council's ongoing support.

4.      Public Meeting re:  Building Department Fees Changes – no member of the public spoke.

5.      Brian Ferguson re Ditchburn Bay Boathouses – He was speaking to Council once again re this proposed plan.  He thanked Council for their positive attitude.  He said the Ditchburn Bay Association understands rules have to be followed and requested that the town fund the OP and Zoning amendment applications and the studies required.  They feel this will benefit the entire town – the area will be cleaned up, jobs will be provided and the tax base will increase.  He asked that Council consider the net benefit to the town.

COMMUNITY SERVICES

1.      Gull Lake Rotary Park Snack Bar Lease – The Request for Proposals for the snack bar closed on Apr. 21.  Three packages were picked up but no responses were received.  The RFP was released again with two food service options – one for a full food service and one for a cold service only.  The RFP closes May 28.

2.      Minutes of Centennial Centre/Aquatic Facility Decision Committee meeting Apr 8.

3.      An Open House for the Centennial Centre Expansion & New Aquatic Facility will be held on May 29 from 10am to 1pm at the Legion.  The Architects, Construction Manager and representatives of the YMCA and the Town will be present to answer any questions.  The Mayor has already presented updates to the Rotary Club and the Pine Ridge Homeowners Association.

4.      Fred Schulz presented re Music on the Barge. The first concert is Sun. June 20 with the Muskoka Concert Band and the closing show is Aug. 15 with the Good Brothers. The rainout location this year is the Gravenhurst Opera House.

Public Works

1.      The Public Works Committee supports the Girl Guides & Pathfinders in continuing the Yellow Fish Program.  The Yellow Fish program highlights to the public an awareness of how pollutants might enter the stormwater system and the natural environment through municipal stormwater drains.  Last year the program was implemented on John St. S., Mary St. S. and part of Hotchkiss St.  This year they will be working on Sarah St. N. and S.  Public Works provides traffic cones, work gloves and safety vests.

2.      Proposal re Wanda III Boathouse – At the May 4th meeting the Muskoka Steamship and Historical Society presented a proposal re the boathouse.  The Muskoka Wharf Board supports the proposal.  Staff have investigated the proposal and some items need further investigation such as land ownership, compliance with municipal by-laws and dialogue with the neghbourhood.  A report will come back to Committee.

3.      Wharf Board minutes of meetings held Mar 9 and Apr. 13.

Development Services

1.      Ditchburn Bay Boathouse – study estimates. Staff have obtained preliminary verbal estimates re environmental and traffic studies - $5000 to $6000 for environmental and $6000 to $8000 for traffic.  Some councillors questioned if previous studies done at the Wharf would suffice.  Nick Popovich explained that these studies would be used as a base.  The impact of the redevelopment of the boathouses would have to be evaluated.  He stated development charges would be applicable as there is no residential component there now.  Mayor Klinck stated this is a unique initiative -he cannot recall having a defined neighbourhood come forward before.  He suggested the proponents meet with the neighbourhood, particularly the Muskoka Bay Properties Owners Association. Mr. Ferguson said they are in the process of putting together a list of boathouse owners in favour of the proposal – he believes it will be 60% to 70%.  They want people to understand the possibilities for the area and will meet with anyone.  Councillor Terry Pilger thinks the idea is worth keeping alive.

Economic Development

1.      Amy Taylor presented a report on behalf of the Transportation Committee.  She reiterated the Committee's points that they were asking the Economic Development Committee to support and answered Committee's questions.  A route of 23 stops is proposed. The route will connect the Wharf, South End Plaza and Uptown.  Stops at the Centennial Centre, new Municipal Office and key businesses have also been included.  The route takes 1 hour to complete.  The fee suggested is $2 for adults and children under 12 free.  The Committee recognizes that the service at this time would only be for July and August.  The Committee is going to try to fundraise to cover costs of this service this year.  Committee passed a resolution supporting:  1.)  The submission of a funding application to Muskoka Futures, for $5,00 in seed funding for a summer service.  2)  Permission to pursue a professional transportation study, only if funded 100% by provincial or federal funds.  3) Permission to continue working on a possible transit solution, including soliciting funds, obtaining quotations and promoting the possible operation times and routes and that once all funds ($24,700) to run a summer service have been obtained to draft a contract with Hammond Transportion to provide summer service. 4)  The contract would be returned to the Economic Development Committee for consideration.

The Transportion Committee has discussed purchasing a vehicle. It was agreed that having a service provider is the best option for the Town to start with.  They are looking at a 14 -16 passenger leased vehicle with decals of the Segwun on the sides. Purchasing a trolley is still a possibility in the future but it will take time to go through the funding applications.

Corporate Services.

1.      Amendment to the Burning Control By-law 2005-208 as amended – Commititee passed a resolution which will regulate bonfires.

2.      Committee passed a resolution approving a request from the Severn Bridge Agricultural Society for $4,400 to assist in construction and improvements to the Fairgrounds.  The funds will be allocated from the Rural Facility Assistance Reserve. Additional funding will be allocated to the Reserve in the 2011 Budget.

3.      A resolution was passed approving the 2010 levy requisition in the amount of $35000 for the Business Improvement Area. 

4.      Fees and Services By-law – At the Council meeting a by-law was passed adopting the new fees. 

5.      A resolution was passed adopting revised terms of reference for the Gravenhurst Accessibility Advisory Committee.

6.      2010 Final Levy By-law – At the Council meeting a by-law was passed adopting the annual lower tier levy; tax rates for upper and lower tiers and to provide for penalty and interest in default of payments. Treasury staff are currently preparing final tax bills. The due date will be Aug. 31/10. The 2010 levy for Gravenhurst is $7,969,677.

7.      Transition to New Financial System & Quarterly Financial Reports – The Town is moving to a new Financial System (Vadim).  The is a joint venture through the Muskoka computer Centre at the District of Muskoka and includes the District, Bracebridge, Lake of Bays Township and Muskoka Lakes Township. 

Councillor Mark Clairmont announced that the Municipal Heritage Committee was successful in its application for funds for improvements to the Barge.

 

Council Meeting

This is where the excitement began.  When the resolution to approve the May 4th, 2010 Committee of the Whole minutes came forward, Councillor Terry Pilger asked that Recommendation “C” be removed and reconsidered.  This recommendation dealt with awarding the entire existing Municipal Office space to the Fire Department.  Councillor Lou Guerriero felt there was a procedural issue with pulling and reconsideration of a motion that was passed with a recorded vote.  He said it didn't make sense to reconsider.  The CAO and Clerk conferred and determined that a 2/3 vote was needed to dispense with Notice of Motion.  This was achieved.  Terry Pilger had to give his reasons for wanting to remove the recommendation – he felt that it had been rushed.  He acknowledged that the Fire Department deserves excellent training facilities.  He wanted to defer until there was a more in depth report and felt the public needs to see the layout of how the Fire Department plans to use the space.  He said there  is no panic – take time to look at the proposal and move forward with a proper plan.  Lou Guerriero said there is no final plan.  An empty building gives the Fire Department the ability to plan. Any requests for capital expenditures would have to come before Council anyway.  It was also said that the building was built for the Fire Department.  Councillor Mark Clairmont is convinced the Fire Department has a case for the whole building and he is satisfied he has enough information to make the decision.  He is convinced there will be no major costs.  Councillor Sandy Cairns was unable to attend the May 4 meeting but supports the Fire Department and think their current conditions are a disgrace.  Bob Colhoun stated that yes, they need the space but do they need all of the space?  Councillor Paisley Donaldson said this is embarrassing – they made the decision.  She was upset that members of the public write letters and put them in the newspaper.  Councillor Tracey Wilson supported deferring and looking at the situation more closely. In a recorded vote the motion to defer was defeated with only Councillors Terry Pilger and Tracy Wilson supporting it.  COMMENT – This certainly sparked lively debate amongst the Councillors.  Some of the councillors just don't seem to get it.  There is great support and respect for the volunteers of the Fire Department.  Yes they need and deserve more space.  However, no written report or proposed layout were brought to the May 4 meeting.  Once again, there appears to be a lack of planning.  Surely there has been dialogue in recent months regarding the needs of the Fire Department.  How can it be that the Chamber of Commerce was asked to bring forward a proposal for renting part of the current municipal office space and then “suddenly” after councillors toured the Fire Hall it is determined that the Fire Department requires the whole space?  The Mayor stated there is a conceptual plan of how the building will be utilized and  that any member of the public can ask to see it.  If you are interested in viewing this preliminary plan contact the Mayor or a member of Council.  It has been stated that the building was built for the Fire Department and that Council is returning the building to the Fire Department.  The writer believes that the two story addition was built for the municipal offices. 

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

 

Council Notes                        April 20, 2010       Without Prejudice

 

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability. 

Council met in closed session at 2pm re property acquisition/disposition.  No resolutions but a staff report will come forward in another month.

Mayor Klinck donned a hockey jersey from the Deseronto Storm.  Mayor Klinck and the Mayor of Deseronto had a friendly wager during the recent Muskoka Shield hockey playoffs.  The Mayor of the unsuccessful team had to wear a hockey jersey from the winning team for an entire Council meeting, as well as make a donation to a charity of his choice.  Mayor Klinck announced he would be delivering a cheque to the Gravenhurst Salvation Army in the name of the Deseronto Storm team.

This was a very long meeting – approximately 6 hours long.

 

Deputations:

1.       Derrick Hammond from the District of Muskoka re Technical Study Review Process.  The District is looking to reevaluate their approach to peer review of technical studies to address natural hazard, environmental and engineering issues.  Most engineering studies are reviewed by Muskoka's Engineering & Public Works staff. However, when “in house” expertise is unavailable the Muskoka Official Plan enables Muskoka to peer review the report at the applicant's expense.  Currently, staff distributes requests for quotation for each technical report and different firms are retained.  The exception to this is Water Quality assessments – one firm has been retained by the District with a standardized checklist.  Staff are proposing this same approach to other peer reviews.  There would be a sole provider with a term of 5 years with a yearly review. There would be no cost to the Town.  He was looking to see if the Town was interested.  Nick Popovich had no concerns and feels it would streamline the process followed now.  Mayor Klinck, Development Services chair, Paisley Donaldson, and Nick Popovich are to dialogue and a report will be brought forward.

2.       Mr. John Ross spoke regarding the proposed site plan agreement for Mr. Ernest Wuebbolt (Muskoka Lake).  Mr. Wuebbolt applied for a minor variance for a proposed boathouse.  The minor variance was approved subject to the applicant entering into a Site Plan Agreement with the town.  The Committee of Adjustment specified that the removal of the boat port be done in accordance with best practices.  Mr. Ross is the lawyer for the adjoining neighbour who commissioned a Site Evaluation Report.  He stressed that every item in the site plan agreement is essential.  This will be dealt with further under the Development Services Committee.

3.       Mr. Brian Ferguson made an interesting deputation on behalf of the Ditchburn Bay Boathouse Owners Association.  He presented a concept of renovation of the boathouses.  Currently there are 57 boathouses in the Bay with 40 owners.  The proposed concept calls for boathouses on the bottom, living quarters on top of the boathouses and a sun deck.  The 40 owners are in general agreement on where they are going.  The proposal would require an Official Plan amendment as well as zoning changes.  They are asking that a special zone be created to recognize this special area.  This approach is unique and would need a design and system to make it work.  They do not want to force anyone to participate until they are ready and therefore it would be a long term project.  All would be on sewers and town water.  The density will not change.  They would like to get the necessary approvals and design one unit.  Units would fill in as owners decide to participate.  Mr. Ferguson  described the benefits to the town and the Wharf area.  They want the co-operation of the town to cut red tape and are asking that the town take out all roadblocks and unnecessary costs.  They consider this a renovation, not new construction, and so therefore there should be no development charges.  Many councillors showed support for the project but did recognize that there are challenges and a process that must be followed.  Nick Popovich advised that the OP and zoning amendments (Town & District) would take approximately 4 to 6 months. A formal application is necessary to proceed but if Council desires the staff report could be done before.

4.       Jodi Holder spoke on behalf of the Chamber of Commerce.   They are investigating  a new location for the Chamber office and would like to be in the centre of Town.  They are expanding to also provide health cards.  She described challenges for the downtown area with the move of the Town Offices, as well as the loss of Giant Tiger, the Liquor Store, amd  the IGA store.  The Chamber projects they will serve over 20,000 customers in 1 year.  They are proposing a lease agreement with the Town for a portion of the main floor of the current municipal building.  They would have to structure timelines with Service Ontario and require their approval for any new location.  This takes approximately 6 to 8 weeks.  Mayor Klinck stated that the Town's major consideration is the Fire Department's needs.  CAO, Cindy Maher estimates the municipal office move for the end of June. Councillor Paisley Donaldson questioned accessibility issues – the main doors would be an issue.  When asked if there would be renovations required, Ms. Holder said yes but nothing structural.  The Chamber was asking if there is an appetite at Council and within the community for the possible lease of the proposed space.  Councillor Clairmont wondered if the Chamber had explored other initiatives such as the Community Policing Office, the Carnegie Centre or the former IDA Drug Store location.  Ms. Holder stated that the Chamber is trying to solve a couple of issues – their own space and also help the BIA. She asked if there is a process for the Chamber to get an indication if leasing at the current Town offices is a possibility.  Mayor Klinck advised that the Town will be coming to terms with the Fire Department needs and will know by the first Council meeting in May.

5.       Lisa & Dave Yeates (Sparrow Lake).  The Yeates' want to purchase a portion of town owned park land which is adjacent to their cottage in order to build a garage.  Their request came before the Development Services Committee at the Jan. 19 meeting and was deferred at that time.  This request was dealt with at the Development Services Committee (see notes below).

6.       John Duck spoke re the new comprehensive by-law and its implementation.  His concern is septic systems and setbacks.  The issue came up when an application was submitted for an upgrade to an existing septic system.  His concern was with the proposed sliding scale re enlargement and extension of non-complying residences in the residential waterfront zones.  Although this has been removed from the new zoning by-law he feels it will come up again. If there is a return to the sliding scale Mr. Duck urges that both structures above the ground and septics are looked at.

 

COMMUNITY SERVICES

1.       1.  Gravenhurst Centennial Centre & Aquatic Facility Healthy Food Choices – Judy Vanderveer, Town of Gravenhurst Recreation Program Coordinator and Brenda Marshall and Mary Ellen Dean of the Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit made a presentation regarding the Eat Smart Recreation Centre Program. This program recognizes and promotes nutrition, food safety and supports a smoke-free environment. Staff are proposing that our new recreation/aquatic centre apply to be an Eat Smart Recreation Centre. The Community Services Department would apply to the local Health Unit to become an Eat Smart Centre.  The Health Unit will assist the Community Services Department via a registered dietitian who will work with staff to create menu choices, create visual displays, promote  “Eat Smart” items on the menu and provide credible nutrition information.  Committee passed a resolution directing staff to develop an Eat Smart Recreation Policy and to become an Eat Smart Centre.

2.       Take heart Muskoka and New Healthy Communities Ontario Approach – Judy Vanderveer provided an update on the Take Heart Partnership of Muskoka and their accomplishments since 1998.  We will now be taking part in the new Healthy Communities Ontario approach.  Take Heart Muskoka received a letter from the Medical Officer of Health for the SMDHU confirming funding for the Ontario Heart Health Program.

3.       Minutes of Decision Committee meeting March 25. 

 

PUBLIC WORKS

1.       Addition Licensed Docking at Muskoka Wharf –The Muskoka Wharf Board is recommending that an additional 6 dock slips be built.  Five applicants have  submitted completed license agreements and deposits to secure possible docking space for the 2010 boating season.  The Muskoka Wharf Board has adequate funds to construct the new docks.  The cost of the docks is $37,690 plus GST.  Committee passed the resolution endorsing the recommendation.  Councillor Sandy Cairns was the only councillor not in agreement.

 

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

1.       Wuebbolt Site Plan Agreement – Mr. Wuebbolt requested that he be allowed to speak and Committee granted permission.  As noted under deputations, a boat port was to removed and a site plan agreement entered into.  Mr. Wuebbolt does not oppose the removal of the boat port but does question requirements of the site plan agreement to restore the shoreline. The Committee of Adjustment did not mention restoring the area. A building permit was issued in October/09 and construction commenced.   The boat port was existing when he purchased the property in 2003. The property has 725 foot of frontage on Lake Muskoka.  The small sand beach next to the boat port was not maintained by the previous owner.  The Wuebbolts want shallow and deep water areas for swimming and also more parking area. In the spring of 2003 the Wuebbolts contracted Coon Brothers to clear the area.  Mr. Wuebbolt claims he developed the area legally (this was confirmed by Nick Popovich) and wonders why they are being asked to remove it now.  He asked that points under #4 in the site plan agreement be removed – these deal with rehabilitating the area.  Councillor Sandy Cairns expressed concerns with that much gravel so close to the water.  Mayor Klinck asked if Mr. Wuebbolt would be happy with the conditions of the site plan agreement to remove the boat port and the gravel next to there.   Councillor Bob Colhoun felt the Committee of Adjustment was looking to have remedial work done in the boat port area only and was surprised when reading the report that the neighbour would have Michalski, Nielson make comment for her.  Councillor Lou Guerriero felt that a site visit should be undertaken.  He feels it needs to be done right with professional advice.  A site visit is planned for April 27 re other work and committee decided to defer this until after that visit.

2.       Proposed Purchase of Town Lands – Yeates  - See deputation above. Staff recommended that the lands be retained by the Town as they provide public access to Sparrow Lake.  These lands were dedicated to the Town as parkland through a subdivision agreement dated March 7, 1968.  The purpose of this lands was to provide water access to the subdivision's interior lot owners. A licence of occupation was granted in 2006 to construct a dock on the property and expires in 2017.  The Yeates want to purchase a portion of the lands to construct a double car garage and feel that it would not interfere with public access or the licence of occupation.  A request by a previous landowner to purchase the property was refused.  Committee passed, in a recorded vote, a resolution that the lands be retained by the Town. The only Councillor to vote no was Mark Clairmont. 

3.       Comprehensive Review – Gravenhurst Zoning By-law – Wianko House Property (Sparrow Lake) – The recommendation of the planning team remains that this property be zoned Commercial Waterfront.  This was deferred at the April 6 meeting so that staff could meet with the new owners to understand the intended scale of development and the commercial operation envisioned.  On April 8 members of the planning team and several Council representatives met with the agents of the new owners.  They prefer the current zoning. The neighbours have concerns that it does not conform with the Official Plan.  Nick Popovich is comfortable that keeping the zoning “as is” conforms with the OP.  Staff did indicate that the owners would be required into a Site Plan Agreement with the Town and noted that it would be important to buffer abutting landowners from any proposed development. 

4.       Application to Close Original Shore Road Allowance and to Close Unopened Road Allowance – Page (Kashe Lake).  This is regarding the application which included the donation of the severed lot, a “Natural Heritage Area”, (a cranberry marsh)  to the Muskoka Heritage Heritage Trust. Mr. Page wishes to acquire ownership of a portion of the Unopened Road Allowance and Original Shore Road Allowance in order to increase the minimum lot frontage of the proposed retained lot. Committee, in a recorded vote, passed a resolution declaring the property surplus and waiving the $559.60 Original Shore Road Closing application fee.  Terry Pilger was the only Councillor to vote no.

 

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

1.       Provision of Visitor Information Services – Community Development Officer, Peter Rigby, brought forward a report at the April 6 meeting  Committee passed a resolution at that time directing staff to look at contracting out the provision of Visitor Information Services for 2010. There is currently $28000 in the budget.  Mr. Rigby brought forward another report.  In this report he presented 3 options:

1.  Accept the proposal of the Chamber of Commerce – The Chamber would maintain a visitor information centre on behalf of the municipality on fee for service basis.  The Centre would be maintained in the current Chamber office location.  The Chamber would ensure that all staff was appropriately trained.  Hours would mirror the License office: Mon – Fri 8:30am to 5:30pm and Saturday 9am – 12pm.  Cost May – December $34,000.

2.  Publish a request for proposal .  Time constraints would make this option difficult.

3.  Town Delivered – Under supervision of the staff of the Economic Development Dept. and with assistance of the Opera House Staff, deliver visitor information at the Opera House.  The Visitor Information would be staffed by 2.5 students for a 12 week period ending Labour Day weekend. Cost of student wages (without any subsidies) at $12.00 per hour would be $14,400 plus required benefits that could total up to an additional $2,200.  This could be reduced with wages of $11 per hour.  An additional consideration could be the use of a part-time student from Labour Day through Thanksgiving weekend or to the end of the year. 

Mr. Rigby recommended Option 3 – Town delivered for the following reasons:

 1.  Town Policy that the purchase of any service or goods over $25,000 requires that a request for proposal be issued.

 2.  Time if of the essence and staff contends that insufficient time exists to undertake the RFP process and to ensure that all requirements for the delivery of the service are properly documented.

 3.  Time is of the essence and there is a need to start as soon as possible.

 4.  As this is an initial step in the development of proper visitor information services for final implementation in 2011, the operation of the services by staff will provide staff with needed information for the development of the 2011 RFP and of any relevant policies and procedures.

 5.  There is a need to identify the optimum location from which to deliver services.

Committee was generally supportive staff's recommendation.  Mayor Klinck and Councillor Donaldson wanted to wait until the May 4 meeting when the Chamber will know if the Town is interested in leasing space to them.  In a recorded vote, committee passed a resolution directing staff to implement Town delivery of Visitor Information Services.  Councillor Donaldson and Mayor Klinck voted no. 

2.       Economic Development Activity Report

3.       Minutes of the Economic Development Strategy Committee meeting – March 10.

 

CORPORATE SERVICES

1.       Asset Disposal re Municipal Office Renovation –   According to the CAO's report many articles such as doors and frames, lights, fixtures, HVAC equipment are to be saved and reused via the architect's design for the new office.  However, there will be many reusable articles that cannot be used in the renovation.  Some articles can be re-allocated to other departments but others will require disposal.  Two twenty foot storage containers are on site and are nearly full of reusable office furniture, tables and chairs, etc) with other goods being stored in rooms that will soon be under construction.  Committee passed a resolution authorizing the CAO to declare the building materials and other articles surplus and to donate those not readily sold and not being used by other municipal departments to the Habitat for Humanity Restore and that the public be informed that these items are available for sale at the Restore.  The Restore will provide pickup.

2.       Mayor's Annual Golf Tournament – Last year (the first year for the tournament) there were 140 participants and $30,000 was raised.  The recipient of these funds was the education programs at the Muskoka Boat and Heritage Centre.  This year the Gravenhurst Curling Club will be helping and will be the benefactor of funds raised.  The tournament will be held in the third week of August. 

 

COUNCIL MEETING

Reports from Municipal Officers – Comprehensive Zoning By-law Review – Greg Corbett of Planscape summarized the public consultation process and revision to the zoning by-law since the second public meeting.  Included in the revisions was the removal of the sliding scale re enlargement and extension of non-complying residences in the Residential Waterfront Zones.  At the April 6 council meeting the Planning Team was directed to delete the proposed sliding scale and return the provision to that which existed under By-law No. 94-54 which would not limit expansions provided that there was no increase in the existing encroachment.  Since then the President of the Kashe Lake Ratepayers Association submitted a request that the sliding scale be maintained and at a minimum be applicable to Kashe Lake properties.  This was included in the Zoning By-law for Kashe Lake. Councillor Terry Pilger asked about the Kashe Lake Plan, which was put into the Official Plan and if they had asked for the sliding scale at the time.  Councillor Lou Guerriero wondered if Council was comfortable with putting in the sliding scale for Kashe Lake with just one letter received.  Council passed a resolution to delete the Section re the sliding scale for Kashe Lake.  Councillor Paisley Donaldson had had a request for a specific property on Kashe Lake for a special provision on their property reducing the 30m setback to 24m.  She could not get a seconder for her motion.

Council passed two by-laws – to Deem Part of a Registered Plan not to be Registered (Levere/Cousineau)-Sparrow Lake.  This allows them to merge their lot with the portion of unopened road allowance that they purchased.

With a recorded vote, which was unanimous, Council also passed the by-law to enact a Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Town of Gravenhurst and to Repeal By-law No. 94-54 and Amendments thereto. 

Council also passed a resolution recognizing the names of the volunteers that plan to work on the parkette on the Berlet Property.

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

 

Council Notes          April 6, 2010       Without Prejudice

 Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability. 

 

    Mayor Klinck was absent.  Council met in closed session re proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land and personal matters about an indentifileable  individual. No resolutions came out of the closed session.

 

Deputations:

  1. Veridian presented a cheque for $3000 to Michelle Van Kooten of KP Manson School. The school plans to use the money to purchase snow tubes.
  2. Carey Anne Oke-Cook of the Muskoka Landowners Association spoke on different topics.  They are working with other ratepayers associations and lake associations and are asking that the District Chair be an elected position.  She also spoke about wanting the public to be able to speak to issues as they are discussed.  She also spoke re the new comprehensive zoning by-law and the official plan.  She asked that rural & remote landowners be exempt from designations or policies unless they request to be covered by these. 
  3. Catherine King, Friends of Southwood Church, spoke re a proposal for a Renovations Plan of the Church.  They would like to restore and preserve and maintain the church. They plan to seek heritage status for the church and also will seek charity status for their group.  They have taken pledges for restoring the church, have met with a contractor and also with the Town building dept. and Tom McNeice who is in charge of town cemeteries.  They want the Town to maintain ownership and the committee would be responsible for all costs for renovations.  Bob Colhoun suggested turning this over to the Municipal Heritage Committee.  Hank Smith, Chair of the Heritage Committee, said they will work with the Friends but need the help of the Town.

Community Services

  1. Debbie Broderick presented a Communities in Bloom Activity Report.  Upcoming activities are a Volunteer & Sponsorship Drive – Committee members will be approaching the public in a “door to door” campaign; CIB Annual General Meeting & Open House – Thursday, April 15 at 7pm at the Gravenhurst Opera House; Operation Clean Sweep on Tuesday, April 20 at 10am at the Town Offices; Free Compost on Earth Day on Thursday April 22 from 10am to 2pm or while quantities last at 200 Nelson St.; Tree Donation Program to replace trees lost in Gull Lake Rotary Park during the tornado – planting to start the week of April 12; Arbour Week – Saturday May 1 at 9am at Gull Lake Rotary Park – Davey Tree will be conducting a seminar and planting session with the Beavers and Boys Scouts; CIB volunteers will be planting public gardens on Saturday, June 5 – volunteers are needed.  Judges will be in Gravenhurst Aug 5 to 7 to judge for the National Communities in Bloom Competition.
  2. Centennial Centre Expansion & Aquatic Centre Update – Deborah Broderick showed sketches of the project – these will be on display at the Town offices. They hope to have an open house for the public in April.  Construction schedule is on target and a preliminary budget will be prepared and it is expected it will be provided to Committee in April.  The Winewood entrance is now closed.
  3. CIB Committee minutes for meetings March 4 and 11.
  4. Decision Committee minutes for meetings Feb. 25, Mar. 11 and 19.

Public Works

  1. Dave Saunders provided an update on the G8 Uptown Beautification Project.  The old decorative streetlight poles and fixtures have been removed from the project area and Tait Electric is preparing the locations where the new streetlight poles will be placed.  Work will continue over the next few weeks to complete the installation and energizing.
  2. Muskoka Wharf Board Meeting minutes – Feb. 12.

Development Services

  1. Bob List, representing neighbours of the Wiancko House property on Sparrow Lake, spoke.re the  comprehensive by-law.   They have concerns with the proposed Commercial Waterfront Zone and want the property zoned Residential Waterfront in part and Rural in part.  Their main concern relates to the density of residential and commercial development permitted as well as conformity with the Official Plan.
  2. Environmental Advisory Committee – 2009 Accomplishments.  A report was given outlining the EAC's accomplishments and also their goals and objectives for 2010 and beyond.
  3. Minutes of Gravenhurst Environmental Advisory Committee meeting Feb. 23.
  4. Designation of the Wheelhouses of the RMS Cherokee and The Islander – A resolution was read authorizing the Municipal Heritage Committee and staff to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the Wheelhouses.  On May 21, 1991 Council passed a by-law which designated both of the Wheelhouses under the Heritage Act.  On September 7, 2004 Council repealed the by-law in order to remove and relocate the structures once development of the Wharf was complete.  The municipality does not want to be involved in the maintenance of the wheelhouses.  The Muskoka Boat and Heritage Centre has been maintaining them – painting, etc.  The resolution was passed.
  5. Draft Site Plan Control By-law – The Development Services Department has been working with Planscape Limited to develop a new Site plan Control by-law.  Staff feels that this by-law, coupled with the new Comprehensive by-law will ensure that the Town's main planning tools are modern and effective. Staff want to have this by-law formally approved when the zoning by-law is approved.  The current process will be followed – large site plans will still be approved by council.  The proposed by-law is available on the Town's website for viewing – Agendas & minutes – April 6.
  6. Remaining Issues Gravenhurst Zoning By-law – Staff were seeking clear direction on a three remaining issues: Muskoka Beach Residential Zone – current zoning is Residential Community and reflects the previous OP when Muskoka Beach was formally considered a separate and distinct community from the Gravenhurst Urban Centre.  The third draft of the zoning by-law would maintain a different zoning (R-3) for this area, with slight reductions to the existing regulations proposed  in order to address the small lot size existing in Muskoka Beach.  The reduced requirements are:  Minimum Front Yard 10.0metres from the existing 12.0metres; minimum side yard abutting a street 10.0metres from 12.0metres; minimum side yard remains at 3.0metres; minimum rear yard 7.5 metres from 12.0metres; maximum lot coverage 30.0 percent from 20.0 percent.   One request was received from the public to further reduce the requirements, one to increase the requirements and one was received stating satisfaction with the proposed requirements.  After much discussion a resolution that the staff report be amended was lost and a resolution accepting the recommendations of the planning team was carried.

Expansion or Reconstruction of Non-complying residences in the Residential Waterfront Zones – The existing by-law permits new dwelling to be reconstructed and/or expanded beyond existing footprints provided that setbacks are respected or maintained and lot coverage is not exceeded.  The draft by-law proposes to introduce a sliding scale that would link the permitted amount of expansion to the existing setback from the shoreline.  The sliding scale would allow the as-of-right expansion only if the dwelling is located greater than 10.0 metres from the shoreline.  The recommendation of the planning teams was to keep the proposed sliding scale.  Council chose to keep the status quo as stated in the current existing by-law.

Wianko House Property – the existing by-law zones the property Commercial Waterfront subject to special provisions that limit the number of units to 25 single detached dwellings and 35 accommodation units in a tourist establishment as well as adds Commercial Recreation as an addition permitted use. The draft by-law would retain the same zoning for the property.  Neighbouring landowners have requested that the property be zoned Residential Waterfront in part and Rural in part. Mayor Klinck was to meet with the new owner of the property to find out what he has to say. Councillor Cairns said Council had received a letter from the new owners of the property and Committee needs time to get more information and to give the new owner the chance to let Committee know what he is proposing for the property. Again after a great deal of discussion, committee passed a resolution directing staff to talk to the new owner. 

  1. Correspondence from Skelton Brumwell & Associates Inc. re Zoning By-law – A letter was received on behalf on McClellans Sand and Gravel requesting two revisions to the draft zoning by-law to match the existing contractor's use and the extend of the Pit and Quarry on Mr. McLellan's property.  This was settled to Mr. McClellan's satisfaction.

Economic Development

  1. Analysis and Report on Visitor Centre – The Economic Development Strategy Committee  passed a resolution at their March 16 meeting recommending that Visitor Information Services become a priority under tourism development.  There is currently $28,000 budgeted for the provision of visitor information services at the Train Station.  This was for an unmanned  computerized kiosk.  Community Economic Development Officer, Peter Rigby, feels this money would be better spent on a live operation.  He suggests that it should be in the Centre Town area – the Train Station, the existing Town Hall, the Opera House, Carnegie Hall. Doctors' building.  The Town could do this themselves or contract it out – one suggestion is the Chamber of Commerce. Committee passed a resolution directing staff to look at contracting out the provision of Visitor Information Services for 2010.  There was a lot of discussion among Committee members as to the timing of this and having something in place this year, whether grants could be obtained for students,  the cost to provide this and adding to the existing budget, where it should be located.  Councillor Lou Guerriero pointed out that committee could pass the resolution but do not necessarily have to implement it once the staff report is received.
  2. Committee passed a resolution designating the 2010 In Water Boat and Cottage Show and Muskoka Ribfest as a “Significant Event”.  This assists the organizers in the application process for a Special Occasion Permit from the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario.
  3. Committee passed a resolution designating the Antique and Classic Boat Show as a “Community Festival” for the purpose of the Special Occasion Permit application process.  This year Caneast Shows will assist with this show and it will be expanded into a two day event.  Caneast will be looking to Diane and Ron Fulton (the previous event coordinators) for direction.  Councillor Paisley Donaldson raised concerns about whether parking attendants will be needed.  Community groups have, in the past, raised significant fundraising dollars working as the parking attendants.  Amy Taylor stated that she will  recommended that Caneast maintain the parking positions. 

Corporate Services.

  1. Brad Rundle, Manger of Arts & Culture highlighted an exciting event to be held at the Opera House this summer – The Gravenhurst Opera House Star Quest series.  This is a talent search series for singer/songwriters.  Auditions will be held on Saturday Mary 29 from 10am until 4pm.  Registration forms are available at the Opera House box office or online at www.gravenhurstoperahouse.com.  Shows are scheduled for June 12, June 26, July 8, July 22, August 6 and August 21.  There will be 10 participants in each of the first five shows and the winners will compete in the final show.  Brad is working on securing prizes.  Celebrity judges will include Canadian Idol winners, country star Jason McCoy, a top representative the The Agency Group and Much Music personality Colin Lew of “DisBand”.  There will be two categories – 6 to 12 and 13 and over.
  2. Clarification – Burning Control By-law 2005-208as Amended – Jim Wouters was seeking Committee's input.  During the Mar 16 meeting there was some discussion whether a bonfire, as defined, must follow the burning regulations as set out in the by-law.  Committee directed Mr. Wouters to add the points as suggested.
  3. Civil Marriage Solemnization – Committee passed a resolution expanding the program of providing civil marriage ceremonies to include facilities int eh Town of Gravenhurst other than those owned by the municipality in accordance with established municipal procedures and the the expanded services be implemented for June 2010. Staff suggested that the basic civil marriage ceremony, which would included the mandatory pre-ceremony meeting that lasts no longer than ½ hour and the ceremony that would last approximately 1/3 would remain at the current fee of $264 plus taxes.  Should the applicants request that the Wedding Commissioner attend additional meetings and/or a rehearsal ceremony, an addition fee of $50 plus taxes would apply.
  4. Construction Management Contract – The Dalton Company Ltd.  This has been signed by the Dalton Company and now needs to be signed by the Town.  A by-law was passed at the Council meeting authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to execute the professional services agreement and construction contract with The Dalton Company Ltd. for the Gravenhurst Centennial Centre Renovation, Expansion and Aquatic Centre.
  5. Minutes of Gravenhurst Library Board Feb. 10

 

Council Meeting

As well as the above noted by-law, council passed a by-law to deem part of a Registered Plan not to be Registered (Stephen and Mary Lyon). - Kashe Lake – Three lots will be merged, thereby creating one parcel of land.  The Deeming by-law is requested by the owners in order to obtain a building permit.

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Council Notes        March 23, 2010        without prejudice

 This meeting is called the planning council because the matters being considered are planning matters.  7 applications requesting exemptions to the zoning by-law were heard.   

Overall comment:   the applications part of the meeting was public with opportunity for the public to speak.   And there was a lot of speaking.  The Daviau application on Driftwood Island has the neighbours concerned.  Overall it was 5 hours long.  Bethune House and its architects also made a brief presentation on the new visitor centre being designed. 

We still have councillors like Cairns and Colhoun who do not get the fact that the cumulative effect of their decisions has negative impact on the town.  In this case they missed and even opposed the concept that buildings should relate to the street and the town and to people walking and even entering the town via car.  They saw no reason why a new development on the main entry way at the gate should have a street friendly design and access to retail.    Yet the Bethune presentation architects made the point that if you want to build Gravenhurst as a desireable town the whole relation to and maintenance of the character of the town has a role to play.   The result of a blinkered viewpoint to development achieves a whole that is less than the sum of its parts.   Opportunities are not only lost, they have a negative impact. 

Bethune House

Parks Canada staff and architects did a brief presentation on the visitor centre design.  It will be a LEED project, i.e. energy and environmentally friendly.  It will be started this fall and finished next spring.  The centre will be on Brown Street and will give a sense of importance and arrival for the visitors but will fit into the context of the town.  It will use materials that are local and traditional, wood and rock, and will have exhibition space and washrooms as well as the capacity to handle large numbers.  The architect made the point that this is not just about placing a building on a site, it is also about using the town to give visitors a sense of Gravenhurst, and carrying through the reflection of Bethune as a Canadian and an innovator.  The designs look very interesting.  Phase 2 will involve a café and gift shops.  It will be accessible. 

Applications  7 were heard plus 2 OSRA closures 

Lake Muskoka,  Brydons Bay      Driftwood Island                Daviau

This single residence island is being proposed for cluster development, which is permitted under the Official Plan.  In cluster developments the residential units shall be set back and the shoreline area is retained as common use area.   They want 6 envelopes approved with a cottage, bunkie, shed, boathouse, dock and septic for each.    The reason for 6, they have 5 children and want each to be able to have their own place in the future.    The island is 20 acres and could be severed into more than 6 lots, in which case each could build the structures proposed.  The island has some environmentally sensitive areas and an environmental impact study has been done.  The application requires an OP amendment and a zoning by-law exemption to the one property one residence rule and to ensure that the mainland access and parking is tied into the property.  The staff recommend approval with site plan control to ensure that the EIS recommendations are implemented.   

The neighbours asked for deferral so that they would have time to review the EIS.  They are concerned about more residences on the island, too much building, too many boathouses, boat traffic could be increased, one neighbour doesn’t want more boathouses.  Design controls should be part of the site plan agreement.  No buildings should be allowed on the narrow channel to the east.   The waterfront landing lot has also raised concerns as there is fear that trees would be lost, there are easements for 2 other islands, extending the dock could be dangerous, the proposal is for too much parking and too many boat slips.

Council asked about the involvement of the district as an amendment will be required to their OP, is the MOE signed off, if they just want to add one more cottage would this be an issue?  Why not do the project in stages over time.  The reply is that this is a long term plan and that to proceed piecemeal means multiple applications.  Based on comments it was decided to defer.       Deferred

Comment;  the applicant has legal rights to sever that would create more development and bigger issues than appear to be in this proposal.   This cluster approach might be the best solution for all.  But, he needs to take time to consult with his neighbours and make clear his intentions regarding impacts on the shoreline and the waterfront landing property.  Resolve those issues and then proceed with the proposal. 

Muskoka Bay                      Matthews                   

This owner has expanded his house and now wants to build a 2 story garage with sleeping cabin on the 2d floor,                         Approved  

Severn River                                    Wright

The owner wants to sever a piece of his property and attach it to the lot next door  which will place the boathouse and dock on the lot with the dwelling.  An undersized small vacant lot will be created.   Staff recommend with site plan control on the undersized lot.                                                  Approved 

SouthGate Plaza

This is the lot north of the plaza with the hardware and Giant Tiger stores which goes north from the arch to the unopened road allowance (Caroline Street) on the north side.  The applicant wants reduced front and side yard setbacks for 3 new proposed buildings one of which will be 2 storey with offices.   The hope to acquire the road allowance for entry and have speedy approval so they can proceed.   The neighbours at the Oakwood Motel want clarity as to what is proposed with the road allowance and also want setbacks so vegetation can be planted.  Storm water and runoff in this area is a problem.  Access and storm water management should be sorted out first before approval.  There is concern about blasting on the site.  A suggestion was made that while the idea of retail and offices here is a good idea the plans should be rethought to make it a street friendly development rather than a 1980s style miniplaza with parking and access at the rear and the backs of the buildings facing the main entrance thoroughfare to the town.  Council asked questions about the road allowance (they have 3 options; sell, give a licence of occupation, build a new road bed and road.) they wanted more setback so the proposal was amended to give 2 metres on the north side.  Clairmont pressed for answers regarding the impacts of the buildings in relation to the arch and also picked up on the idea of making the development relate to the Muskoka Road street and foot traffic.  T.Pilger backed him up.   Colhoun and Cairns opposed this idea.      Staff suggested that access and storm water and design should be part of the site plan process.                       Approved 

Sparrow lake                       Craven 

She wants to sever the rear portion of her lot and attach it to an abutting backlot.  This will give the back lot an existing cottage along with approval for reduced setbacks for side and front yards.  Other irregularities with the waterfront dwelling will also be corrected by means of special provisions.                         Approved

Comment:  bad practices in the past combined with lax enforcement of the laws have created many problems throughout the municipality.  This old development area on Sparrow Lake is rife with them.  The application will correct or legalize some of this historic  problem.   

South Muldrew lake                                   Martin

The Martins want to add to their cottage and therefore be only 19.6 metres set back from the water.  They must purchase the Crown Reserve along the shoreline so building will have to wait until this is done.      Approved

 

            Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website. 

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Council Notes        March 16, 2010     without prejudice

Overall Comment:  a very uneventful meeting   

Winter Carnival   the winter carnival committee reported on the successful winter carnival and asked for a $200 fee waiver to utilize the Trillium room at the Opera House for the reception to honour the many volunteers.  Approved.

The discussion:  councillor Cairns wanted to see the financial report from the committee before agreeing so asked for a delay.  The mayor spoke forcefully in favour of the carnival and its impact and T.Pilger said he did not want to place more barriers before volunteers as he hopes the carnival becomes an annual event.  Guerriero and B.Pilger indicated they are uncomfortable with waivers for nonprofits as the rental rates are already reduced.  In the end all voted for the waiver. 

Air show       Richard Onley of the Canadian International Air Race Organization briefed council on the plans for a revived air show at the airport.  July 17-18 is the date.  It will involve vintage WWII airplanes, spitfires, etc. in celebration of the 70th anniversary of the Battle of Britain.   Other later planes and acrobatics will also be part of the show.  No funding sought but is asking for support in their application to FedNor. 

Gull Lake Rotary Park   the log and tree replanting project was updated.  There will be 4-5 thousand board feet of gull lake Pine available to the public.  Notice will be in the papers.  The public can also make a donation to plant trees in the park. 

Muskoka Road Streetscape improvements.  The tenders are received for the new streetlights.     It is coming in under estimates.  Lights will be the same as installed on the south side of the tracks.  They are LED so will use less energy and reduce glare into the sky. All will be funded from the Federal grant announced last year 

Road closure.  A road off Muriel Crescent will be closed and sold to adjacent lots. 

Economic Development   The EDO activity report was tabled.  Since the Economic development strategy committee identified visitor information as a priority the EDO will bring a feasibility study back to council.  Approved to proceed with report in 2 weeks.

Discussion:     Cairns, is he planning for this year and mentioned the train station.  Klinck indicated that the BIA and Chamber have commented and strongly support the need and its resolution.  Clairmont wants to expand from visitor to economic development information.  Guerriero cautioned that stetting up this kind of thing takes time and resources and there is only 2 months before tourist season so wants realistic expectations. 

Dog and burning control by-laws.   The areas for expansion of dog control and burning were approved.  Dog licensing fees will increase.  A limit will be placed on the number of dogs.  Wilson asked about owners in the new areas with more than 3 dogs at present – they will be grandfathered for existing dogs.  The mayor wanted to confirm that vets are exempted from the limit.

There was some confused discussion about permitted fires.  The definition of permitted depends on purpose of the fire – if for hear or cooking it is allowed.  For burning yard waste it is not allowed. 

A new fire truck at the Kilworthy station was approved for $425 thousand.  Clairmont wanted to know why a tender was not sought rather than a sole supplier.  It was explained that standardizing trucks between stations facilitates training.  Also the company is reliable. 

Comment:  Clairmont worries about tenders at this level but did not at the time ask why the municipal project at 1.9 million was not tendered.   Very inconsistent. 

Debentures.  By-laws to debenture 9.3 million were approved.   The money is for the new municipal offices and the centennial and aquatic centre expansion.  No term or dates for issuing the debentures were provided.    

The agreement to receive the gas tax for 4 more years was approved. 

Civil marriages      the town provides civil marriage ceremonies in town owned facilities and uses 3 commissioners in rotation.  The clerk wants to see fees increase, doubled, and to develop new procedures, guidelines and forms.  She proposes that as the clerks office staff are very busy this be postponed until September.  Colhoun wants to see changes for June and a lower fee.    Guerriero asked for a more detailed report to come back.   T.Pilger wants to take advantage of the wedding season.  Some councillors oppose providing this service and see no need for expansion.

Comment:  The issue has arisen as people want to use the commissioners in  non-town owned facilities.    In the discussion it was indicated that there have been 10 weddings in 2009, the busiest year.       The clerk described a make work approach to providing this service.  She states that the town staff choose which of the 3 commissioners can be used, book the location, review the ceremony, do the legal paperwork, e.g. mail the licence form to Thunder Bay etc.    What could be a simple process has been made complex and bureaucratic.  Most of it could be done by placing information on the website.  Let people do their own co-ordination.    Only the formal paperwork requires town staff involvement. The work load is on the commissioner as they have the contact with the bride and groom.  This is missing a great opportunity to bring business into town by placing roadblocks in the way of expansion with no need for additional resources.    

October elections   a sample of the slightly revised mail in ballot package was shown to council.   It is essentially the same as the last election with better instructions.   

Committee minutes tabled:  Communities in Bloom, the Centennial and Aquatic centre expansion, the Heritage advisory and Economic strategy committees were tabled. 

            Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website  

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Council Notes                      March 2, 2010       Without Prejudice

 Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.  

Community Services

  1. Minutes of Decision Committee Meetings Feb. 4 and 11.  Regular meetings are being held and things are progressing on schedule re the Centennial Centre Expansion and Aquatic Centre.


Public Works

  1. Proposed Lease – Muskoka Wharf – Wolff's Den Cafe – they will be next to the Century 21 Real Estate Office.  The lease will apply to lands located between the existing building and the boardwalk as well as a 30.1 square metre rectangle located immediately west of the building.  The north section will be used a a licensed patio and public seating area and will extend from the building wall to the boardwalk.  The west section will occupied by a set of stairs to the second level and a possible generator. The fee is $1.00 for the first year of the lease and subsequently $1.00 per square foot, or $1,366 plus the annual December Consumer Price Index.  The length of the lease is 10 years.   A by-law was passed at the council meeting authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to Execute the Lease Agreement.

Development Services

  1. Minutes of Gravenhurst Environmental Advisory Committee meeting Jan. 26.

Economic Development

  1. Noise Exemption for Gravenhurst Winter Carnival – A resolution was passed at the Council meeting granting a noise exemption.
  2. Ministry of Transportation – Highway 11 Study – This was brought back from the February 16 committee meeting.  Staff attended the Feb. 16 public information session.  Design considerations include:  closure of at grade intersections and entrances; widening highway with either barrier or grassed median; increase number of lanes; improvements to existing interchanges; new interchanges and service road connections; realignment of sections of highway 11; and service road alternatives (in front or behind existing properties).  One additional alternative is a full by-pass of Gravenhurst.  The Economic Development Officer states in his report that the contemplation of these proposed changes is already having an affect on the Highway 11 corridor businesses. Staff feel that Council passing a motion to be sent to the Ministry of Transportation stating that the proposed changes are not acceptable is not enough.  The Economic Development Officer feels that the Town needs to present the MTO with information why the proposed changes are not acceptable and what the possible ramifications could be to the Town.  He feels this needs to go, not only to the MTO, but also to ministries such as Economic Development, Tourism and even the Premier's office.  He recommended that a small team be assembled to determine the proper course of action, information requirement and to commence the development of the response.  Representation should consist of a member of Council, Community Economic Development Officer, Town Planner, representation from the BIA, Chamber of Commerce, District of Muskoka and Tourism Muskoka.  A resolution was passed at the Council meeting endorsing the report and directing staff to proceed.

 

Corporate Services

  1. Replacement of Front Line Fire Truck Capital Budget Report – Deputy Fire Chief, David Eidsness brought forward a report as requested at the Feb. 16 meeting.  The report explained the reasons for the proposed replacement fire pumper at the Kilworthy Rd. fire station.  It is fire department policy to replace trucks every 15 years.  If the truck being replaced is still in good condition they use it as a reserve truck for 5 years.  This truck is too far gone.  Components will be taken off the existing truck to be used on the new truck.  Committee was satisfied that a new truck is required, rather than refurbishing the old one. 
  2.  Proposed Fees -Use of Municipal Lots for Other Than Parking Purposes – This was brought forward by Chief Municipal Law Officer, Jim Wouters.  During budget preparations it occurred to him that, during events at the Wharf, rental fees have not been paid to the town for use of parking lots.  During these events the lots are used as stalls for vendors or for other purposes other than parking.  Currently, users pay a fee for use of land but not for the use of a municipal parking lot.  Mr. Wouters feels a rental fee should be established per day per parking space when used for other than parking.  He suggested the fees collected could be:  1)  placed in a reserve fund for securing lands for new municipal parking lots, and/or 2) set aside in the payment of the annual debenture, and/or 3) allocated to the By-law Department (to a maximum of 20% of the fees collected) to offset the administrative and staffing cost for the function.  A minimum of $5.00 per day per parking space in lots 11 & 17 at the Muskoka Wharf could generate $1,260/day (252 spaces x $5.00).  Municipal lots at The Wharf were constructed at $2,731 per space and the currently the annual payment for the Muskoka Wharf parking lot debenture is $47,227..97 per year.  Mr. Wouters was seeking comment and direction from Council. If they proceed it must be put out for public comment.  Sandy Cairns wanted to know if users had been contacted –  not yet. Lou Guerriero felt The Economic Development Committee should be involved as well as going through the public process.  Paisley Donaldson wondered if it  will deter events coming to town.  Bob Colhoun felt it should have gone through the Wharf Board first. He has a problem with the idea.  Mayor Klinck felt the report is appropriate but agrees the Wharf Board should have input as well as the Economic Development Dept. and that there should be dialogue with event organizers.  Mark Clairmont thinks it is a good opportunity to generate revenue at the Wharf. 
  3. New Logo for the Town of Gravenhurst – the new log was adopted by Council in March, 2009.  It was decided to officially launch the new logo at the same time as the move to the new Municipal Offices.  There are items that need to be ordered now in order to be ready to be used at a later date but the date may come prior to the official launch.  Examples are the sign for the Centennial Centre Expansion and Aquatic Facility, paper products and possible banners.  Therefore the new logo will be utilized only on a limited basis until its official launch. 
  4. Resolution – Town of Huntsville.  A resolution was passed at the Council meeting supporting the resolution of the Town of Huntsville to petition the Premier of Ontario to take the necessary steps in a  timely manner to provide additional funding to the Muskoka Algonquin Healthcare to ensure continuation of services as described in the Deficit Reduction Plan.
  5. 2010 Municipal Election – Voting Method  - A by-law was passed at Council authorizing the use of the vote by mail method.  Clerk Candace Thwaites acknowledged the challenges encountered in the 2006 election.  A number of changes to the ballot kits have been incorporated by the supplier and tested in recent by-elections.  Mark Clairmont suggested that information should be given to voters about the new wards.

A by-law was also passed authorizing the use of optical scanning vote tabulators for counting the votes.

  1. Municipal Elections Act – Requirement for a Compliance Audit Committee Amendments to the Municipal Elections Act require that all municipalities appoint a Compliance Audit Committee for the purpose of conducting compliance audits of candidate's election campaign finances, if required.  Council passed a resolution accepting in principle the concept of a Muskoka – Wide Compliance Audit Committee and directing the Clerk to work with the other Muskoka area clerks to investigate the same and report back. 
  2. Gravenhurst Public Library Annual Report 2009
  3. Minutes of the Library Board – Jan. 20.
  4. 2010 Operating and Capital Budget – Council passed a resolution approving the 2010 Operational and Capital Budget.  Total Tax Supported Budget Requirements - $7,969,677. - Operational Budget $7,534,862; Capital  Budget $434,815.  This is up just over 8% from 2009.  Total gross operating expenditures budgeted (before revenues are deducted) are $11,757,774.  COMMENT:  This was passed with only one question from any of the Councillors.  At the Feb. 16 meeting Terry Pilger had requested that $9000 for computers for the councillors be looked at.  He commented that he thought something would have been brought forward at this meeting.  Some discussion followed and the $9000 was kept in the budget. Councillor Lou Guerriero and Treasurer Ken Watson were praised for their work on the budget and Council congratulated themselves and staff. For further information please refer to the submission prepared by Ross Ashforth on behalf of the GGRA.

Council MeetingCouncil passed the above noted by-laws and resolutions and then went into closed session – proposed acquisition/disposition of and and a personal matter with respect to an identifiable individual.  No resolutions were expected.

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Council Notes        February 23, 2010     without prejudice

This meeting is called the planning council because the matters being considered are planning matters.  The meeting had 2 components, applications for exemptions to the zoning by-law and the draft comprehensive by-law.  In addition the idea to seek $4,000 for the Kilworthy Canada Day celebrations was approved. 

Overall comment:   the applications part of the meeting was public with opportunity for the public to speak.  The remarks from the public were brushed off.

The comprehensive zoning by-law discussion was amongst the councillors.  The public were spectators.   Many of them appear to have not read or understood the relationship of the parts of the zoning by-law and hence how it will play out over time.   They clearly have not thought about the consequences of implementing the staff recommendations.  The associations have commented on the drafts in writing and in meetings and no councilor asked how their concerns are being addressed.  The overall impact is to say that for these councillors public input is meaningless and can be disregarded.   

Applications  6 were heard plus one OSRA closure

Overall Comment on zoning applications:  the council by means of body language and facial expression managed to convey to the members of the public present that public input is not welcomed nor is it being listened to.   This reporter has never been more discouraged or disgusted in 4 years of attending meetings.   They also demonstrated a complete disregard for the purposes behind zoning requirements of the waterfronts.      They appear to have no interest in adhering to their own by-laws and other legal requirements. 

South Muldrew Lake         Cafferata

This vacant property is too small and according to the OP should not be built on unless all zoning requirements are adhered to.   The applicant asked for 5 exemptions.  The lake association and neighbours wrote requesting that most of the exemptions be denied, they were willing to see approval of the reduced setback from the water level.  The applicant demonstrated no justification for the requests as the proposal is to build a new cottage, which means that creativity could solve the lot size problem.  Council was disinterested during the delegation and Colhoun indicated that he expected the lake association to negotiate with applicants.   Apparently this is not the town role even though the OP prohibits approval of this many exemptions and the town is legally responsible for the by-law.   T.Pilger asked about a site plan approval, there is one from 2007 for a previous owner, and suggested that the 20 metre setback then approved then be adhered to.  staff recommended approval  Approved 

Lake Muskoka                     Hicks

This odd shaped lot has many constraints.  They asked for a reduced setback for a screened porch, habitable space, from 12.6 to 10.4 metres.  Approved  

Pine Lake                 Lee

This lot is far too small and as with Cafferata above should have stringent restrictions.  The planner acknowledged this and asked for a site evaluation which proposed that development should be restricted to 20 metre setback with extensive conditions.  The neighbours wrote to object to the application and impassioned delegations were heard.  The neighbours have offered to buy the lot.   Despite the site evaluation report the council approved a 19 metre setback. 

Cairns wants to ensure that staff do follow up with site plan control, and Colhoun referenced the site evaluation report and then voted to further reduce the setback.  The mayor acknowledged the applicant as a reliable builder who he knows from previous business contacts.  Approved                                        

 Kilworthy      Fisher

Has a 10 acre lot and wants permission to sever 2 acres.  The severed lot will be rezoned to rural Approved.  residential.                                                           

 South end Plaza

The owners want to sever the property into 8 lots.  They claim financing will be easier.  Approved                                                                   

Muskoka Bay                      Wuebbolt

He wants to build a garage 11.4 metres from the water.  1 neighbour objects, 1 supports and 1 asked via a lawyer for a deferral.   This property has been before committee several times for boathouse approvals.  There is a site plan agreement in effect and it does not include this garage.   Council discussion as follows: Wilson, is the boat port removed yet? If  not when?; Guerriero not happy, there is a request for deferral and wants to defer.  He is concerned with the size of the garage, 3 car; T.Pilger is opposed to 11.4 metres. Cairns wants to visit the site.                                   BPilger and Klinck opposed to       Deferral

Comment:  this application is a good example of the need for surveys being submitted.  The rough drawing did not give  a good picture of the size of the proposed garage.  It also shows the power of using lawyers.  Would it have been deferred without the veiled threat?  

Kahshe Lake           Erin Island      Strenzel-Gibson 

This is back from previous month.  The staff were directed  to ask applicant to reduce request.  They will now remove stairs which have already been built and give up less than 3 square metres of shoreline development.  Council is still not happy.  Donaldson wants a deferral and to ask for more reduction.            Deferred

Comment:   all the items for exemption were built without approvals or permits.  Why doesn’t council just tell them to remove it all and start over with the proper process.   This was hinted at by the KLRA last month and would be a good object lesson for future applicants. 

The other big item on the agenda was the draft 3 of the comprehensive zoning by-law. 

After 2 public information meetings and individual meetings with members of the public the planners have identified several items where they want direction. Council was able to decide on a couple and not on others

Comment;  the material presented was not available before the meeting so neither the council not the public had time to look at the questions and consider  the issues.  Although the public has had meetings with council members on some of these issues.   And these items have been in public drafts to date.

The planners did not bring any facts into the discussion to guide the decision making.  Several times reference was made to the budget pressures coming in the future.  Does this mean councillors are finally understanding the nature of the debt legacy they have created.  They now appear to think that this can be corrected by promoting bad waterfront development  

The issues 

·      Washrooms in boathouses

Planner:  boathouses are not to be used for habitation.  Washrooms, if permitted, will lead to illegal habitation.   

Cairns  it will be too far for people to walk back to the cottage if washrooms are prohibited now that the setback is 30 metres.  Boathouses often flood therefore put washrooms on the 2d floor.

TPilger  allow a 2 piece only by restricting the square footage

Colhoun  has no problem with washrooms.  Terrain constraints make them necessary (even on level lots)

BPilger  does this mean we grandfather existing ones

Guerriero they create pollution problems

Donaldson  if there are terrain problems then use the variance process

Wilson   there should not be washrooms in boathouses

On a vote       only Guerriero, Donaldson and Wilson voted to ban washrooms.

Comment:  the planners brought no data in to support the discussion.  For example, the number of cottages built at the 30 metre setback.  we would find very few.   Those who previously voted for and favoured 2 storey and habitable boathouses are now confusing the issue with reference to the 30 metre setback.  This is the use of a red herring to support bad planning on the part of those who favour development  no matter what the consequences. 

·      Lot size  

Planner:  Gravenhurst has old plans of subdivision with lots which are considerably undersize as we now know what frontage and area is required to protect the health of the lakes.  The existing provisions from zoning by-law 94-54 are being brought forward.  Owners of these lots can ask for special provisions and amending by-laws.  

During the consultation lot owners have asked that minimum lot sizes be reduced overall.

Minimal discussion and the decision was to leave it as is. 

·      Muskoka Beach area              R3 zone

An individual landowner has asked that all setbacks in this area be reduced and that lot coverage be increased.   

The OP specifies that this area should retain its existing character and that reduced setback and increased coverage  would change it significantly.       

Guerriero wants to see these options in writing and have a chance to ask questions. 

TPilger feels the same   

·      Fish habitat

Should this be mapped in the by-law schedules.

Discussion is that this is a federal matter and that town should not do the mapping. 

·      Urban area lot sizes                R1 zone

Planners have recommended reduced frontages to 35’ as a way of promoting intensification,  Should these be reduced frontages be kept in the by-law?

Klinck   thinks this should be considered except for lots on the waterfront. 

Guerriero  this will promote intensification.

Colhoun likes this as it will give builders the option for lower cost housing.

Comment:   there are other ways of achieving intensification and these have been explained by professional planners from the associations to the town planner and consultants and to councillor Donaldson.  Smaller lots have been approved in the past via subdivision agreements, by variances and with detailed conditions laid out.  This change to 35’ lots has been opposed by residents who do not want the older areas of Gravenhurst to turn into streets of garages.   As the by-law requires parking for 2 cars a 35’ lot will be mainly garage or asphalt on the street.  There will be no room for driveways.      In future the areas where this is done the town will look like the suburbs of the GTA.     

·      Wianko property on sparrow Lake.

This is an historic issue of commercial zoning on one property.  Opposed by local residents. 

·      Expansion of non-conforming dwellings on waterfront lots.

The planners have proposed a sliding scale limiting size of expansions.  Options presented are: leave things as they are whereby a building too close to the water can be expanded to multiple times its size all of which is too close to the water or  Go with a sliding scale but let expansion adjacent to the water continue or expand only to the rear with no size constraint.  The lakes have asked for limited expansion and preferably only to the rear. 

Guerriero likes the current situation, unlimited expansion on all 3 sides

Colhoun agrees “we must stay competitive”

Klinck  how about site plan control within the shoreline development area.  It was explained to him that site plan control can only apply conditions which are in the by-law.

TPilger    likes unlimited expansion only to the rear

Comment;   this is a significant discussion as it will over time change the character of the lakes.  If things are left as they are, the rebuilding of old smaller cottages into large cottages will further turn the lakes into subdivision like settings.  This has consequences for all lakefront owners in Gravenhurst, about 50% of the taxpayers.   Right now property values in Gravenhurst are lower than for similar properties on similar lakes in other municipalities, partly because Gravenhurst is losing its Muskoka character.   But it is clear that the council wants to continue on their current course and is being driven by a predisposition to development and a desire for unrestricted building activity. 

This and the small urban lot permissions discussed above will have great impact on our area and will reduce opportunities for economic development which utilizes the natural character of municipality.    

·      Bay Street commercial zoning

The proposal has been to rezone Bay Street down to the wharf as commercial which would allow arcades, commercial parking and other commercial uses.  The Heritage committee requested that uses in this area be restricted so as preserve the character of the old houses, lawns etc.

Cairns  while wanting to keep the character thinks commercial parking should be permitted. 

Direction appears to be go with heritage committee request but keep commercial parking. 

·      Single detached dwellings in commercial zones

The expansion of commercial zones means that many existing residences will be non-conforming,  They can retain their use but can they be expanded?

Answer from council is yes to enlargement, expansion or rebuilding. 

EP zones

TPilger asked whether the EP zoning could be refined to have multiple zones with varying uses.  Reply from planner is it could be done.  

Follow up

Items which can be delegated to staff need identifying, Planners are to take the content of the discussion and bring a final draft back to council in March.  Unresolved issues will come  back to council in committee stage for discussion.

            Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website.   

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Council Notes        February 16, 2010     without prejudice

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.

Mayor Klinck and Councillor Tracey Wilson were absent.

Deputations:

1. Danielle Millar updated Council on the Ontario Winter Games. The opening ceremonies will be held Mar. 4 at 7pm. Tickets are still available for the opening ceremonies.

2. Marg McLaughlin provided an update on the Gravenhurst Winter Carnival. A complete list of events is available on the Town website. The Committee is still looking for volunteers to help with the various events. If you are able to help out contact Amy Taylor at the Town office.

3. Rebecca Willison from the District of Muskoka gave an interesting presentation re Muskoka's Lake System Health Monitoring program. The full report is available on the District of Muskoka website. She showed results from 2009 and also the 2010 schedule of lakes to be tested.

4. Ross Ashforth presented the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association's 2010 budget observations. Comment: Why did Deputy Mayor Bob Colhoun not ask if council had any questions or comments re this presentation? This is generally the procedure and it is what happened with the three other deputations. A few questions were asked by councillors in the Corporate Services meeting.

Community Services

1. G8 Uptown Beautification Project Update Components that Community Services are responsible include new street furniture including waste & recycling containers, benches, bike poles, information kiosks, planters, baskets, banners, festive street lighting and flag pole. Purchase orders have been released for these.

2. Centennial Centre Expansion & Aquatic Facility Project Update The Decision Committee is meeting on a weekly basis. The planning is moving forward. The Centennial Centre will be closed to the public on Mar. 9 and will reopen for summer ice users. A preliminary budget and a construction schedule will be prepared and should come to council in early March. The Decision Committee has now met with the youth of Gravenhurst regarding the skate park.

3. Minutes of Building Committee meeting Jan. 15.

4. Minutes of Decision Committee meetings Jan. 22 & 28.


Public Works

1. G8 Uptown Beautification Project Update streetlight poles & fixtures as well s the retrofit L.E.D. Luminaires have been ordered and are being manufactured. The L.E.D. Retrofit bulbs and all of the luminaire fixtures are scheduled to be shipped on Feb.22 and arriving on the 24th or 25th. The streetlight poles will be shipped in two shipments on Mar. 8 & 15 with receipt on the 10th & 17th.

2. Amend Disabled Persons Parking By-law 2003-59 Trinity United Church requested the addition of a disabled parking space on the south side of Church St. east of Muskoka Rd., next to the existing space. The resolution was passed. This will be implemented in the spring when the snow is gone. The by-law amending by-law 2003-59 was passed at the Council meeting.

3. Minutes of Muskoka Wharf Board meetings Nov. 11, 2009 and Jan. 12, 2010.

Economic Development

1. Municipal Events Guidelines & Application Form Staff have been reviewing events scheduled and the execution of those events. Committee passed the resolution adopting the Municipal Events Guidelines and Application Form.

2. Community Economic Development Officer, Peter Rigby, gave an overview of activities of the Economic Development Dept. He also reported that Gravenhurst will be the host for the youth portion of the G8.

3. A public meeting was being held Feb. 16 at the Trillium Court regarding Highway 11. Terry Pilger brought forward concerns of the Economic Development Strategy Committee. He asked council to look at it so that it does not affect the Hwy 11 corridor businesses. Terry will bring a recommendation back to Council in the near future. Both Peter Rigby and Nick Popovich planned to attend the open house.

4. Minutes of the Economic Development Strategy Committee Jan. 12.

Corporate Services

1. Amend Burning Control By-law 2005-208 With the passing of the new ward boundaries, Chief Municipal Law Officer, Jim Wouters, brought forward a by-law to identify properties within the wards that were previously banned from burning, as well as close the gaps or loopholes in neighbourhoods that existed, and to add properties in built up areas that should be banned from burning. The proposed amendment will be advertised in the Banner on Feb. 24 and Mar. 3. Public comments are to be received by the Clerk by noon on Mar. 8. Public comments will be reviewed and the by-law will come back on Mar. 16 for consideration.

2. Amend Dog Control By-law 87-183 This is a similar situation to the burning by-law. The amendment will recognize the new ward boundaries and redefine the area where the maximum numbers of dogs kept is two per household. Any household being moved from a 3 dog limit to a 2 dog limit will have the third dog grandfathered which will allow the dog to stay until its death or it is given away. The proposed amendment will also recognize and define Service & Therapy Dogs.. The proposed amendment will also increase the annual dog licensing in all categories. Proposed annual licensing fees are: Per Male Dog $25; Per Female Dog $25; Per Dog owned by person 65 or over $20; spayed or neutered dog $15; kennel $75; service dog and dog owned by a police force no charge. Proposed amendment will be advertised the same as the Burning Control By-law and returned to Council on Mar. 16.

3. Opera House Online Ticketing System & Website Brad Rundle reported the online ticketing system has been implemented and the Gravenhurst Opera House website is up and running and will evolve over time.

4. Minutes Gravenhurst Accessibility Committee meetings Nov. 19 and Dec. 19/09

5. Minutes Library Board Dec. 9/09

6. Draft Budget Update Staff continue to review their budget areas and identified the following amendments Fire Department (210.999) increase of $37.644 to reflect staffing complement approved in 2009; Economic Development (821.999) decrease of $5,636 -minor changes made to reflect program needs; Community Services (700.999) decrease of $60,000 transfer to reserves no longer requested; Community Services (700.999) decrease of $32,646 amended to reflect staffing request for Parks/Centennial Centre; Parks (711.999) increase of $24,687- reflects the allocation of proposed staffing allocated in other areas; Centennial Centre (712.999) decrease of $12, 237 reflects the requested staffing proposal. The total change was a decrease of $48,189. Committee members asked some questions, particularly as related to the GGRA submission, and complimented Councillor Guerriero and the Treasury Department on the format and clarity of the document. Councillor Bob Colhoun felt there were areas they could still reduce and that staffing is one of them. After much discussion committee decided not to move forward with requests for Community Services request for the addition of a full time Parks and Arena Operations Foreman; By-law request for reduction of part-time staffing and the addition of a full time By-law Enforcement Officer they will keep the 2 summer students instead; Public Works/Wharf they had requested moving 5 contract public works/wharf operators to full time positions the one contract position that is up in July will be converted to a full time position and the other 4 will be kept on contract until the end of the contract positions and will be re-evaluated at that time. Staff and council will continue to look at the budget and evaluate other areas. Councillor Colhoun requested a report from the Fire Department as to what tuck is being replaced and could it be refurbished. Councillor Terry Pilger this they should reconsider computers for council members the District councillors will be provided computers by the District and $9000 was included in the budget for the town councillors. Councillor Paisley Donaldson wondered why there was nothing in the budget for the Opera House. Councillor Terry Pilger asked what happens to unused budget money. Treasurer Ken Watson explained that any surpluses are allocated to the general capital reserves.

Council Meeting

Council passed two by-laws: To deem part of a registered plan not to be registered (Jescan Poser Inc.) as well as the by-law amending the disabled parking by-law.

Council went into closed session.

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Council Notes        February 2, 2010     without prejudice

 Overall Comment: 

The major item on the agenda was the draft budget for 2010.  This is the first presentation of staff recommendations for new staff and additional spending.  The draft is showing a requested 10.26% increase over the 2009 approved budget or a 12.9% increase over actual 2009 expenditures.  Is this sustainable for you the taxpayer?   If you are concerned, this is the time for you to write and ask the council to hold the line on spending increases, and no new staff.   The GGRA submission in November asked for a 0 increase in spending and taxation and no new staff until they review the current efficiency and effectiveness of the town administration.    

The budget:   this was tabled for information purposes only.  The mayor asked questions to ensure that staff had a chance to speak to the requests for 7 additional staff plus seasonal employees.

  The schedule for the budget is as follows: February 16 the public will have a chance for deputations and council will discuss the budget themselves.  Then March 2 the budget will be presented and presumably approved.  

The cost pressures are debt servicing and staff wage increases.  The total wage increase projected is 9%.  (this does not mean that an individual staff person is getting a 9% increase.  It means that the total bill will go up by this amount for raises, changes in level of jobs, promotions, and new staff.)  The loss of revenue, from the landfill sale, from rents and from lower building permit revenue increases the costs to the taxpayers.  This is compounded by increased debenture payments for the proposed town hall and salary raises for staff.   In addition they are projecting that tax penalty income will rise by 90 thousand dollars a year.  There will also be a 3% increase in fees and charges.  The total expenditure is projected to be over 11 million dollars.  Of this over 8 million will have to come from the taxpayers.  The only significant increase in income is for tax penalties and arrears.  This is based on an acknowledged “difficult” economic environment and more people having trouble meeting their tax obligations.  Transfers from the reserves to operations will be down 152 thousand dollars.  Note that the town budget is only 1/3 of the cost of taxes.  The District component is unknown.  `

Comment:  the information package for the budget improves every year in terms of clarity.  We have more understanding of where the money goes.  But it does not improve in terms of the numbers themselves.   The budget shows considerable pressures from prior decisions, mainly the assumption of debt plus past staff increases and wage settlements.   This will only get worse as time passes because what is not included in this budget is the financing that will occur this year for the infrastructure and the new municipal office, another 2.9 million, and then even more in 2011 when the enlarged centennial centre and pool which will entail interest and principle on a further 6 million.  Further the pool operating costs will mean and additional annual deficit in operations of at least 200 thousand.  Calculating the costs of interest and principle on these new debts in 2011 the town will be facing debt servicing cost of approximately 1.69 million dollars a year (this is 21% of this years tax revenue), without taking into account the maintenance of services already being provided.   It is important to note that staff salaries comprise almost 50% of expenditure.  This base cost goes up every year and is very difficult to constrain.  That is why adding 7 new staff will only make future year problems proportionately worse.

Again you are urged to speak up; it’s your money.

 

Muskoka Road Streetscape improvements.  Approval was given for the tenders for street banners and street furniture and display units.   All will be funded from the Federal grant announced last year. 

Centennial Centre expansion and aquatic centre.  This project will mean the closure of the arena.  Groups currently renting space and time will be relocating.  Temporarily.  They will have their rental costs kept the same if they are using other town facilities.   The committee for the expansion project met and as of January 7th was projecting a 500 thousand dollar increase in project costs.  They are still grappling with design issues.   Council discussion was about the signage for the centennial centre.  Can it be made more visible? 

Comment:  projected cost increases at this early stage are of concern.   The design has already been reduced because of too low cost projections last year.  We need to monitor to see how well the budget can be adhered to.    

Fee waivers    Two requests for fee waivers for planning matters were presented.  Staff recommended against the waivers.  One was turned down the other approved.  Discussion on the first was minimal.  On the second application from a church the mayor spoke in favour of the request on the basis that the congregation is small and this would set a valuable precedent for other churches requiring assistance.    He feels that churches provide services to the community and deserve consideration.  T.Pilger pointed out that churches already receive assistance as they pay no property taxes (this is a Provincial decision) and this could be a dangerous precedent.  Clairmont talked around the issue and wants to see this as a one off.  Colhoun pointed out that this is $38 per congregant, but supports the mayor.  There was a recorded vote and only Terry and Brian Pilger voted against the fee waiver.

Comment  this is a dangerous precedent.  Should the local taxpayer be funding religious institutions?  Even if only by way of waiving legally imposed costs.  Where does this stop?  The mayor and Clairmont are clearly in a vote getting mood. The implications  of this precedent on the taxpayer is troubling.   Congratulations to both Pilgers for standing up for restraint and understanding the dangers in this decision.  This is taking the municipality out of its jurisdictional sphere as did the earlier decision to fund medical consolidation.    Consequences long term could be severe.   

The Heritage and Environment committees reported.  Heritage has taken on a significant work plan for 2010. 

The progress on the strategic plan was reported.  The mayor acknowledged that significant areas are missing: downtown revitalization (should we say survival?) and the Muskoka centre.  TPilger pointed out that the provision of service industrial land is needed.  He asked why if the fire department is meeting with an architect that there are no dollars in the budget.  He also asked about the roads update.  The treasurer acknowledged that the infrastructure deficit for the town is growing. 

Comment   the treasurer rightly alluded to the fact that the roads and bridges are deteriorating and are in worse condition.  Instead of spending to address this problem the council has decided to mortgage the town for new offices.   Which contributes most to the citizens?  

            Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website. 

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Council Notes   Planning Council     January 26, 2010    without prejudice

The meeting is known as planning council as matters before it primarily relate to land use planning matters.   There were 3 planning matters, one OSRA closure and one resolution to request a $4,000 grant for painting the Barge. The agenda showed 5 applications, however a clerical error gave the wrong location to applicants and those notified as to the location of the meeting.  These 2 were deferred until next month  

Overall comment:

Once again we see applicants who build illegally and then want forgiveness for the structure built even though they far exceed ‘minor” in breaking the town laws.   Staff take a very very lenient approach to these situations and when pressed hedge their recommendations to council.  There is a lot of backtracking.  This reporter wonders where the direction is coming from?.

The applications

Kahshe Lake   Strenzel-Gibson

They own a lot on Erin island and have gone ahead and built a sleeping cabin and decks and other structures without approvals.  They now want these regularized through this rezoning and special provisions process.   Staff want some portions of the illegal structures removes, but nor the significant items such as a large deck extension.  Not only are they going too close to the lake, but there is no vegetative buffer between the buildings and the lake.  Therefore the buildings are visually very intrusive.    The KLRA does not support the application as it is outside both the OP and zoning rules but also contravenes the kahshe lake plan.  Councillor comments:  Donaldson referred to the KLRA letter and asked staff what they would do if the illegal building had not occurred.  (The response was very weak and hedged)   Colhoun feels that more illegal structures should be removed than staff recommend.  Guerriero feels this way too.  T.Pilger asked if the sleeping cabin could be moved back from the water.   A second accessory building is labeled storage, but the windows have curtains and they want a deck on the building. 

Staff was directed to work with the applicant to identify needed changes.                    Deferred

Comment:    the councillors finally seem to be taking the rules seriously and seem to want them enforced.  I hope this continues.  With one exception the comments were directed to the by-law requirements and lake needs.  The exception was Clairmont who asked why worry about setbacks when, being on an island, there is separation from the neighbours by the lake so they will not be impacted.   He clearly understands neither the zoning by-law nor OP nor does he understand the need to protect the lake health and character.  He also apparently did not listen to the input from the KLRA.

Kahshe lake             O’Brien

If you recognize this name it is because the application first heard last July is back.  When the severance was approved last year the deficient frontage on this lot was missed.  Instead of 120 metres the frontage is now 72 metres.  This is an old property with multiple buildings and the applications have been cleaning the mess up                                               Approved

Muldrew Lake                      Cafferata

This was deferred because of the address mix up.  This application has been acknowledged as having considerable correspondence from the MLCA and neighbours.  The applicant is asking for multiple variances.  Despite the unanimous negative comment from the community the staff said they will recommend approval.

Lake Muskoka  Lakeshore Drive           Clark

A very minor matter. A corner of a backlot will be severed and attached to the adjacent waterfront lot because of an encroachment.             Approved

Lake Muskoka Lawland Heights                        Hicks

As with Cafferata this was deferred because of wrong address. 

An update was provided on the zoning by-law.  Draft 3 is now available.  The public meeting will be at 5:00 Pm February 9th at the Opera House. 

The council approved requesting $4,000 from the Community foundations of Canada to paint the Barge.   

            Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website. 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Council Notes                      January 19, 2010       Without Prejudice

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.   

Council met in closed session regarding personal information pertaining to an identifiable individual – no resolutions.  Mayor Klinck was away. 

Deputations:

Two deputations were heard.  Robert Clement of the Royal Canadian Legion was asking for a   building permit refund.  The Legion applied for and was granted an accessibility grant for $31,500 to provide a wheel chair lift for the downstairs of the Legion and automatic doors for upstairs.  The building permit costs were $300.  A resolution was passed at council to refund the permit fee. 

Nancy Beal spoke on behalf of a group who want a Dog Park in town.  The group has met with Deborah Broderick and also the Wharf Board.  They have identified potential sites and are scheduled to meet with By-law officer Jim Wouters.  They were asking for support in principle.  The group was advised to continue to work with Debbie Broderick and then she will bring forward a report. 

Community Services

  1. Request for Quotation for Commercial self-watering hanging planters – This is part of the Streetscape Improvements being funded by the G8 monies.  Three quotations were submitted – Alfa products International, Amethyst Horticulture and Bala Garden Centre.  Staff recommended accepting the quote for Hanging Baskets from Amethyst Horticulture, based on the size of the reservoir and the method of filling.  Staff recommended accepting the quote for planters from Alfa Products, based on the size of the reservoir and the colour selection.  The resolution was carried.
  2. Request for Proposal for the Planting, Delivery, Watering and Maintenance of Hanging Baskets.  This year the town will be using 100 reusable, self-watering baskets with built-in water reservoirs.  The pots will be purchased through the G8 Summit Project funding.  The self watering baskets will lessen the amount of labour required for watering from 7 days a week to 2, depending on the weather, and will save the amount of water lost from run-off.  Bids were received from Brackenrig Nursery, Bala Gardens and Muskoka Stone & Garden.  Over the 15 week period the lowest quoted cost for watering & maintenance is equivalent to the cost to the town for full time general labour.  Staff recommended accepting the bid from Muskoka Stone & Garden for planting ($6,215.00) and delivery ($559.35) only.  Town staff will do the watering and removal and cleaning of the pots.  Carried.  This year the Communities in Bloom colours for the baskets will be red & white wave petunias with a green ivy.
  3. Centennial Centre Expansion & Aquatic Facility Project Update – Deborah Broderick provided an update on this project.  The Building Committee has provided input into the design of the project. This committee continued to meet and discuss the space program in relation to the overall square footage.  They discussed how the space requirements impact the budget and reviewed some options to try to reduce the overall impact to the estimated budget.  A summary of various design discussions and subsequent direction was provided.  They had their final meeting last week.  A decision making group will now take over.  Currently the project is about 3% overbudget but they will continue to tweak the design to come in more on budget.  Councillor Terry Pilger asked where we will reduce to be on budget. He also asked when the tenders will go out and Debbie hopes to release the first tenders by the end of January.    Councillor Lou Guerriero said they are at a good starting point.  There will be no change in the square footage but other things can be looked at such as fittings, etc. to bring the price down.  They will have to wait for the tenders to come in.  Councillor Mark Clairmont asked about seating for the arena side and about the walking track.  The walking track is still being considered on the cold side.

A preliminary budget and construction schedule are being prepared and will be provided to Committee soon.

  1. Terms of Reference for the Decision Committee for the Centennial Centre Expansion/Aquatic Centre – The Decision Committee's mandate is to oversee the successful completion of the project by making decisions on allowable purchases as defined in the Project Specific Purchasing Policy.  The term of the Decision committee will be concluded once substantial completion is achieved and occupancy is granted. If the tenders are over budget the Committee will have to decide whether to go ahead or come to council for direction.  The committee will be made up of a maximum of 4 councillors, including the Mayor.  They will be voting members.  Others members are representatives of CS&P Architects, Dalton Company (the Construction Management Company) and the YMCA (the Service Provider).  A quorum requires 3 council members to be in attendance.  One staff member will provide support to the committee.  Other staff on the committee will be from Developments Services,(Building Dept) Corporate Services and Community Services.  They only voting members of the committee are the council members.  Council members on the Committee are John Klinck, Sandy Cairns, Lou Guerriero and Tracey Wilson. A resolution was passed at Council approving the Terms of Reference. This means the committee will take effect immediately.
  2. Minutes of Building Committee – December 10 & 17, 2009.

Public Works

  1. G8-Gravenhurst Uptown Beautification Project Update- Dave Saunders provided an update.  The streetlight components have been ordered from Philips Lighting. The 4 G8 signs “Investing in Community Infrastructure” are in stock & should be erected in the next couple of weeks.  The next step is to secure a contractor(s) to retrofit the 198 existing streetlights as well as install the 61 replacement streetlights. Councillor Tracey Wilson asked if the project had been tendered and Mr. Saunders replied that because of the unique nature of the lights that they went to the same supplier that provided previous installed lights.
  2. Leased Dock Space at Muskoka Wharf – The Wharf Board wants to place recurring ads(January & July) for expressions of interest for additional docking to develop an inventory of interested parties. In January, 2009 an ad was placed and 34 inquiries were received and information packages were sent out to those respondents.  From the 34 packages sent out 5 completed applications with deposit were submitted. In Dec., 2009 there were 3 slips available for leasing.  The 3 spots have been awarded.  Staff has been directed to place an ad on the Town page seeking Expressions of Interest for future dock space.  Lou Guerriero explained that the Wharf Board wants to keep an inventory so that when it makes good business sense then they can construct more docks.  Sandy Cairns does not want any more docks in that small area and thinks they should again look at leasing some of the docks there.  Councillor Guerriero replied that the slips on Dock “D” are for short term rentals (a maximum of 1 week) and that the town has an obligation for events to use the existing docks.  The build out plan has always included 80 docks.  Committee passed the resolution endorsing the recommendation made by the Wharf Board to place the ads.   Current costs for dock slips are $1900 plus taxes for 1 year and $105.60 per foot for boats over 22 feet; and $15,836 plus taxes for 10 years and $84.50 per foot, per year, for boats over 22 ft.

Development Services.

  1. A resolution was passed to extend conditions of draft approval for Beechwood Forest (Wellington St.) Subdivision for 2 years.
  2. Proposed purchase of Town Lands (Kilworthy Rd.)  Lisa & Dave Yeates want to purchase town lands that front on Sparrow Lake.  They own property directly to the west of the property and want to construct a shed or small garage.  They would consider purchasing a smaller portion of the Town owned land as an alternative.  The subject lands were dedicated to the Town as parkland through a subdivision agreement in 1968.  The purpose of the land was to provide water access to the subdivision's interior lot owners. In 2006 a Licence of Occupation was obtained by a Lynne & George Tripp to construct a dock on the lands and expires on June 5, 2017. An identical application to purchase the town owned lands was made by a previous landowner in 2001.  Committee refused that application.  In view of the direction provided by the Official Plan and the goal of providing public access to water, staff strongly encouraged that the lands be retained by the town.  Councillor Mark Clairmont asked Committee to grant permission to Mrs. Yeates, who was in attendance, to speak.  Permission was granted.  Councillor Clairmont asked that this be deferred so that the Yeates' and Development Services staff could talk and then a staff report could be brought back.  The deferral was carried.  COMMENT:  This is confusing.  The Official Plan encourages that the town provide people with access to the water.  An identical situation was brought forward previously and the vote was to keep ownership in the Town's hands.  A licence of occupation already exists on the property.  Why defer the vote?
  3. A resolution was passed staggering the terms of the appointed members of the Environmental Advisory Committee.  One year terms – Ralph Culham, Michael Foster, and John King.  Two year terms – Gail Stiver, Danny Epstein and Paul Kelly. In the future all members will be appointed for two year terms.  This will achieve overlap in membership terms and avoid having all new members appointed  in the future.
  4. Highway 11 Class Environmental Assessment & Preliminary Design Study Update – Report presented for information re Hwy 11 Class Environmental Assessment & Preliminary Design Study.  This addresses improvements to Hwy 11 from Washago to Gravenhurst.  Staff attended a Ministry session in December 2009.  The Ministry hopes to conclude the Class Environmental Assessment & Preliminary Design Study by November 2011.  They want to create a controlled access highway with access to the highway provided by elevated interchanges.  Existing at grade intersections and driveways for residences and businesses will be eliminated and replaced with new interchanges and service roads.  The Ministry has indicated there are 5 alternatives to accomplish their goal:  Adding an extra lane to both the north &south directional lanes

                                     Widening the existing highway by means of a grassed median

                                     Bypasses of sections of the existing Highway 11

                                     Interchange alternatives

                                     Service road connection alternatives

It is anticipated that the majority of properties located within the study area will be affected.  The next stage in the process would be for the Ministry to hold Public Information session.  They have indicated there will be three with the first one likely to be held in Feb.,2010 but as of yet staff have not heard of any specific date.  Ministry reps indicated the new construction would likely occur between 2019 and 2033, depending upon the increase in traffic volumes using the corridor.  There is no financial impact to the town at this time but there may be significant impacts upon the tax base of the Town in the future as the assessment base on Hwy 11south is substantial. Councillor Bob Colhoun feels there should be representatives of council at the meetings with the Ministry as well as staff and the town should be extremely cautious about what the Ministry is doing.

  1. Green Energy & Green Economy Act (GEGEA) Nick Popovich provided a summary of new provincial legislation which encourages the growth of renewable energy projects and removes barrier to the development of green energy projects.  The new act has three main areas that will impact the Town:  It will require all municipalities to develop and enact a conservation and demand management plan; It will enable all municipalities to generate up to 10 megawatts of electricity that is renewable:  It will remove a municipality's planning powers as they relate to the development of renewable energy development projects. Under the Act there will be a single approval process known as a Renewable Energy Approval and the approval will fall within the jurisdiction of the Environmental Assessment Act.  Before this Act, a large renewable energy project proposed in Gravenhurst would have likely resulted in an Official Plan amendment application and a Zoning By-law amendment application.  These would have both been subject to a public process.  The right to appeal a decision to the OMB is replaced with a limited appeal to the Environmental Review Tribunal.    Staff does not believe there is much opportunity for large wind general plants within the Town boundaries as there are not sufficient sustained winds.  With changing weather patterns this could change in the future.  Staff feel that,  based on the Act and accompanying regulations, a landowner wishing to erect a single wind turbine would not require and REA and would not be subject to regulations of the zoning by-law (height & setbacks) and this could impact upon neighbouring landowners. There is more of a potential for a large scale solar facility but at this time most large scale facilities are in southwestern Ontario.
  2. Minutes Environmental Advisory Committee Nov.24,2009.
  3. Minutes Heritage Committee Dec. 8, 2009

 

Economic Development Committee

  1. Economic Development Activity Report – A synopsis of activities.  New EDO, Peter Rigby is still in the learning process.
  2. Minutes of the Economic Development Strategy Subcommittee – Nov. 19,2009
  3. Appointment of Directors – BIA.  A by-law was passed at the later Council meeting deleting Frances Gardner and adding Chery Fallon-Noad and Sonja Hagen.  BIA Past President, Judy Terry, announced that Brandon MacGregor is new BIA President.

 

Corporate Services

  1. Power Savings Blitz Program Update -Veridian Connections & Hydro One – Facilities Maintenance Coordinator, Tim Irwin reported audits were conducted on eligible municipal buildings in Nov. & Dec.  Work orders were submitted for grants and work to be conducted for 7 locations.  Work orders totaled $6382.76, net cost was $117.00 and Yearly savings $2606.40. Each work order if eligible for a $1050 grant.  Five projects have been submitted for budget 2010 consideration.  Another energy conservation program, the Feed in Tariff Program, is also being looked at and an Expression of Interest has been submitted to Local Authority Services Ltd. by the Community Services Dept. with regard to the new Aquatic Centre.
  2. Request for Quotation 2010 Clerks -001 Generator.  A resolution was passed to accept the quotation from Total Power Ltd. at a cost of $1891 for the first year and $1947 for the second year to provide preventative maintenance to generators at the Town Office and Health Unit building.
  3. Bill 212 – Amendments to the Municipal Elections Act – Clerk, Candy Thwaites   outlined amendments to the Municipal Elections Act.  The first change is the date for the election.  Under the previous legislation it would have been November 8, 2010 but now has been established as the 4th Monday in October in an election year which falls this year on October 25.   Many other changes were detailed.  A full report is available on the Town website – Agendas & Minutes – Committee of the Whole Jan 19, 2010.  A by-law for Alternative Voting Methods and Vote Counting Equipment must be passed by June 1, 2010.  Councillor Mark Clairmont asked if public comment will be considered when determining the voting method.  Ms. Thwaites said they will consider public comment received after the last election and welcome input from members of the public.  COMMENT – If you wish to provide input this will have to be done very soon to enable staff to bring forward their report well before the June 1 date
  4. Library Board Minutes November 11, 2009.
  5. Thank You Letter to Gravenhurst Fire Department – a letter was received from a local resident thanking and commending the Fire Department for their response to an incident at her home in Dec.
  6. Thank you Certificate – Olympic Torch Relay

 

Council Meeting

Council Minutes Dec. 8 & 15, 2009 – Councillor Terry Pilger asked that resolution #316 of the Dec. 15 minutes re the proposed new municipal offices be removed & considered separately.  This required a 2/3 majority vote to pull it out and discuss it.  This was passed.  Councillor Pilger felt that, because of questions received from the public, it was prudent to discuss it in a public procedure.  He brought forward some of the questions that had been asked in emails and letters.  Some comments from the councillors were:  Paisley Donaldson feels a need to move forward to the new offices.  She feels $1.9 million is too much and suggested that they cap the renovations at a certain figure.  She is comfortable with the non tendering process ascouncil talked about the reasons for using the contractor on site. The contractor is doing a good job on the doctors' building.  When they bought the building there was no hope of a pool. She wants to complete the move in this term of council.  COMMENT – Councillor Donaldson did not seem to fully understand what council has done – she thought they would still be tendering the electrical work, etc.  She was told this is not the case – they will be using the tradespeople already on site. Councillor Tracey Wilson agrees there is not room at the current building but thought a budget should be set.  She asked “how do you know you saved $500,000 if you didn't go to tender?  The CAO explained the $500 thousand in savings by quoting from the architect's letter and his explanation of the savings.  Councillor Mark Clairmont hates the fact they are moving to the south end and worries it will affect the downtown.  He says something else could go in the rest of the current building that will generate traffic downtown. COMMENT – I guess similar to the vacant Canadian Tire, Giant Tiger, IGA and Liquor Store buildings. He says council must look ahead and be forward thinking.  He did say that the main task of the EDO should be assisting the downtown to fill the empty stores.  Councillor Sandy Cairns expressed appreciation for the letters received.  She feels Gravenhurst is in a much better predicament that Bracebridge – the municipal offices will be closer to our downtown.  Bracebridge still has a vibrant downtown. We have a beautiful downtown which is and will remain vibrant.  She feels the new streetscape program will help. She suggest council ask the BIA what else the town can do to help.  The strategic plan identified the need to expand the town offices.  The Fire Department's training office was built to be a truck bay.  They have expressed a need for more space.  COMMENT – Is there a report documenting the needs of the Fire Department? She feels the $1.9 million is too much money.  Councillor Lou Guerriero said this started with the doctors.  The town had the opportunity to buy the Health Unit Building, a $6 million building for $3.2 million. Should the medical presence disappear the town will own their new building.  He feel the renovation pricing is in line, although the $1.9 million is tough to swallow.  The current offices are cramped and there are accessibility issues.   Councillor Bryan Pilger agrees the current facility is cramped and that the fire department needs more room but he is bothered by the nearly $2m renovation costs and the fact that they only have the word of 1 architect and 1 contractor.  Councillor Terry Pilger emphasized that he is not saying that the municipal offices do not need to move but council is not following their own purchasing policy, although council can override it . If the minutes are passed “as is” council has no control and no budget.  He questioned how many more people they can accommodate at the new building. The CAO replied that this depends on the square footage each new person would require.  Councillor Pilger also asked who is going to manage the project and what is their incentive to keep costs down.  The architect gets a percentage (8%) of construction costs.  Councillor Bob Colhoun says there is lots of room to expand at the new building.  He says it is a known fact that it is cheaper to uses forces already on the site.  It is time consuming to go out to tender.  The $1.9million includes the architect's fees.  At a meeting the town was very explicit about making sure if there is any way possible to do it cheaper, do it. The architect is an honest man.  If the project is done piecemeal it will cost more and will disrupt everyone.  The $1.9 million is not going to change if you change the date of the move.  A vote was taken approving this resolution to be part of the minutes.  Councillors Bryan Pilger, Terry Pilger, and Wilson voted no.  Councillors Cairns, Clairmont, Donaldson, and Guerriero voted yes.  The minutes were adopted as circulated.  COMMENT – STILL NO CONTROL, NO BUDGET AND NO DIRECTION FROM COUNCIL TO FIND  COST SAVING MEASURES.  THERE WAS AN OPPORTUNITY HERE FOR A RESOLUTION TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD AND COUNCILLORS FAILED TO TAKE IT.

 

New Business 

Correspondence from Durham Region re:  Ombudsman Act and Public Complaints re: Hospitals.  They are seeking support with respect to amending the Ombudsman Act to authorize the Ombudsman to investigate public complaints about hospitals.  Ontario remains the only province in Canada whose Ombudsman has no jurisdiction over hospitals.  Council supports the resolution as received from the Town of Fort Erie.  Staff will bring back a resolution for the next Council meeting.                      

  Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

 

Gravenhurst Council Notes        December 16, 2009            without prejudice

 

The meeting is known as planning council as matters before it primarily relate to land use planning matters.   There were 2 planning matters.

 

Overall comment:

The primary purpose of the meeting was the mandatory “public meeting” on the draft of the new comprehensive zoning by-law.  In addition there was one OSRA closure and sale.

The Zoning by-law

This is the set of rules which will determine the character of Gravenhurst for the next decade.  It is amongst the most important items for consideration by Council.  It sets out the rules for land use and should ensure environmental and property protection for all residents.

Many written submissions were made prior to the meeting and several participants reiterated the points made in their submissions.  In addition new oral submissions were heard.  The overall input was that the draft is not ready to be finalized and more than tweaking is required. 

The presenters were

            Professional planners – they critiqued definitions, specific items and mapping of specific properties.   They warned of several implementation problems if parts of the draft stay as is.

            Associations  - they indicated they wanted more than a cursory look at requests regarding waterfront requirements and the urban residential changes proposed.  Implementation concerns were also raised.  They requested further meeting with the planners to improve the document.

            Individuals – they sought clarity on specific properties and also raised some of the questions which came from associations

By the end of the meeting it was clear that more work and meetings are required and that the timetable for the by-law will have to be extended.  The planner was directed to follow through on this.

Questions from council were limited, although some useful questions regarding the impact of other legislation, such as the building code, on the requirements in the by-law

            Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website. 

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Council Notes                       December 15, 2009       Without Prejudice

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.   

Council met in closed session re litigation or potential litigation, meeting with town lawyer and proposed acquisition/disposition of land.  Councillor Sandy Cairns declared a pecuniary interest on 1 item.

 

Most of this meeting was routine matters.  However, I found this to be one of the most difficult meetings that I have attended and covered for the GGRA.  The total disregard for the taxpayer during the discussion, or lack thereof, regarding the new Municipal Offices was disturbing. 

 

Community Services

  1. Centennial Centre Expansion/Aquatic Facility – Summary of Public Comments – Deborah Broderick summarized comments and concerns raised by the public and provided comments and rational to address them.  The Building Committee will discuss these comments and concerns with the Architects and if required staff will report back to committee on any significant changes that would impact the budget or space program. The full report with the list of concerns and staff comments is available on the Town Website – Agendas & Minutes.
  2. Correspondence from Communities in Bloom – The Town of Gravenhurst has been invited to participate in the 2010 National CIB competition.  The registration fee of $900 is due by January 15, 2010 and since this is before the budget approval Councillor Cairns was seeking direction from Committee.  She stated there will be no increase in the CIB budget, they will work within the dollars available.  Mayor Klinck wondered if we should take a break from the judging – are the same amount of funds needed to maintain the gardens, etc.  He asked about additional costs, other than the registration fee.  It costs approximately $3500 to bring the judges to town, provide accommodation and create the profile book. Councillor Guerriero questioned the use of town staff – he thought it was all done by volunteers. Councillor Donaldson asked what are the goals of CIB.  She feels Gravenhurst has been recognized nationally and have the garden at the CN Tower and said CIB has brought tourism to town.  It is a beautification program that enhances & highlights the community.  Councillor Clairmont feels the program has merit and supports participating in the judging.  Councillor Wilson wondered about competing internationally – once we achieve the highest level nationally we can compete internationally.

Councillor Colhoun feels with the G8 coming it is incumbent upon us to make the community beautiful.

Comment – I agree that the CIB program and budget need to be examined, as to all proposed budgets. However, I found it ironic that this was discussed and questioned to the degree that it was and then when the huge cost of renovating and moving the Town Offices was brought forward there was great enthusiasm on the part of some councillors and others remained silent and provided no comments or questions.

 

Public Works

             G8 'Gravenhurst Uptown Beautification Project' Agreement – The funding was announced April 13, 2009.  A report detailing the project was sent to Tony Clement's Office on August 14.  The agreement was signed in November and returned to the Town on December 4. All of the work is to be done by March 31, 2010.

Dave Saunders presented a report outlining the work to be done, delivery time and time available to complete the work.  This project includes retrofitting all of the streetlights installed on Muskoka Rd. S. from Bethune Dr. to James Street and all of the streetlights and parking lot lights at the Muskoka Wharf with L.E.D. Energy efficient bulbs.  Existing street lights will be replaced from James St. to Winewood Avenue and from Muskoka Rd. 169 from Bethune Dr. to the Muskoka Wharf.  Streetscape furniture is included – waste & recycle containers, benches, bike poles, community kiosk units, bollard, planters, banners, festive decoration units and flag pole centres.  There is concern with timing – 6 weeks to ship the lighting components which would leave only 6 weeks for the work to be done according to the funding agreement.  The costs of purchasing & installing the street lighting and streetscape furniture components is fully funded by the Federal Government for $1,201,000 as per the funding agreement.  Should the project not be completed within the timelines, the agreement could become null & void and the Town would have to reimburse the funds. The District of Muskoka is scheduled to reconstruct Muskoka Rd. from James St. to Winewood Ave., beginning in Sept, 2010 and competing in the summer of 2011.  This would involved the removal of the new lights and furniture and they would be then be reinstalled after the District work is complete.  The report states it was suggested to Minister Clement's office that the material be purchased but wait to complete the replacement of the streetlights until after the District's work is complete.  However, he states that the agreement remains the same and that this is not allowed; the materials must be purchased and the work must be completed by March 31, 2010.  Councillor Colhoun asked Mr. Saunders if the work can be done by the end of March if we get the lights by Feb. 15.  Mr. Saunders hopes so but cannot promise – it is weather dependent.  Treasurer, Ken Watson said that we can approach the Ministry and ask for concessions but he doesn't know if they will provide them.  Councillor Paisley Donaldson expressed her disappointment – the Town did what they were supposed to do and is disappointed the time lines have not changed.  She feels we should get as much done as we can.  Mayor John Klinck feels this is a once is a lifetime opportunity.  There are means and methods to do as much as you can.  Now that we have the agreement let's get at it and spend as much as we can.  Councillor Mark Clairmont echoed the Mayor's comments.  A bylaw was passed at the later Council meeting authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to execute the Agreement with the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities.

 

Corporate Services – Council moved Corporate Services up on the Agenda so that the Architect for the renovation of the new municipal office could make his presentation.

1.  Presentation by Brian Bertrand re New Municipal Office – In November a report was presented.  The estimated cost for the project by Montieth Building Group was $18,884,000.00.  The architect recommended the municipality also carry an allowance for exterior work (to tie the existing building into the Municipal Office) of $75,000.00 plus a contingency of 10-15% of the construction cost plus applicable taxes and soft costs for a total of approximately $1,900,000.00.  A debenture of $1.9 million over 20 years at the current rate of 4.81% would mean an annual payment of $150,000 including principal & interest.  It also addressed the advantages of working with the current general contractor on site rather than putting the project out to tender. At that meeting Council passed a resolution directing staff to work with the architect, to investigate the cost of the renovation/construction in a reduced amount and report back to council and to negotiate through the architect with the contractor on site to renovate/construct the existing Health Unit building to the Municipal Office. The architect reported that the previous proposal was high level.  They have reviewed the project and have developed a strategy to create a middle of the road/slightly upper end project.  He identified 9 items that could be reduced to save money.

-Flooring – delete carpet tile and replace with carpet                                        Savings - $10,555

-Council Chamber Ceiling – change from “Latitudes” tile to “Teqular”                                  1,305

-Cabinetry – change from granite tops to laminate tops                                                            24,975                                                                                                                                     

-Entry space ceiling – change from “Geometric Design” to “Teqular”                                   5,115

-Meeting rooms – change from standing glass walls to aluminum glass frame system      50,000

-Birch wall panels to be removed and replaced with living wall                                           12,950

-Removal of Skylights                                                                                                25,632

-Reduction in demolition due to the design change                                                        7,841

-Reduction in structural material and labour due to design change                                     10,147

          Total Credit Available                                                                                             $148,520

This reduces the initial cost to $1,751,480.00.  These figures are dependent upon the final construction documentation and market conditions.  The reduced amount does not include a review of the $612,199.00 in allowance.  The $612,199.00 consists of mechanical, electrical, site work, testing, controls, signage, data drops and exterior work and the architect would like to see those figures remain as they are. The letter from Monteith did say that the mechanical allowance of $291,060 and the electrical allowance of $173,139 have not been reviewed and further credit may be available.  The cash allowances of $73,000 for site work, testing & controls, signage, data drops and graphics has not been reviewed and further credits may be available.  The cash allowance of $75,000 for exterior works has not been reviewed and further credits may be available.  Mr. Bertrand did say that the ball was in Committee's court and if they tell him what the budget is they will work towards it.  Councillor Bryan Pilger asked about the skylights.  Councillor Mark Clairmont would like to see the skylights back in the Council Chambers.  He feels the councillors need to be comfortable in the chambers as they spend a lot of time there.  Mr. Bertrand said they were asked to find savings and now we are adding back in.  Councillor Bob Colhoun inquired if, by reducing, the Town would be penny wise and pound foolish.  The architect said no, he is pleased with the operational layout and some of this is window dressing and aesthetics.  Perhaps there could be a dormer window in the Council Chambers instead of skylights.  Removing the skylights will not take away from the project.  Councillor Colhoun suggested that the carpet tiles be put back in as there is a lot of traffic and the carpet tiles would be good value for the money. 

At this time CAO, Cindy Maher brought forward her report.  In addition to the architect's report staff tried to look at the overall project and to give the Committee a total cost associated with the project.  The Town owns most of the furniture at the Health Unit building as well as the furniture at the current Town office.  There has been no allowance made for new furnishings at this time.  In order to determine exact pieces to be utilized and a “fit” a furniture fit would have to be completed.  Architect and engineering fees are usually standard at 10% of the construction cost.  However, since tender packages will not have to be prepared because the existing contractor will take on the work, these fees will be reduced to 8% of the construction cost.  There is a phone system in the building but it has not been determined if this will meet the needs of the town and so a rough estimate of a phone system has been obtained at $30,000.  An estimate of $10,000 has been included to physically move from the current office.

Councillor Bryan Pilger asked about servicing the debt.  The cost for carrying the debit is a 1% tax increase for every million dollars borrowed.   At this point in the meeting the Mayor pontificated for several minutes about the need for the Town to move to this building.  He is thrilled with the customer service orientation.  The new space will be a vast improvement over the current offices which are too small. There is nowhere to put summer students and they can't be trained properly.  The people of Gravenhurst have the right to have a Town Office that is efficient and effective.  The employees have a right to have a facility that they are proud of and enjoy going to.  There is no privacy in the current building.  There are issues with the Fire Department that need to be addressed.  It is going to cost some money but it is needed.  Council owes it to the community and the staff.  To those that say the Town should not move out of the town core he says the new building is within the core.  The various business nodes of town form a triangle and the public has to go through town to get to these areas.  The new building will be good for contractors and for deliveries – it is right off the highway. This is a good move.  Councillor Colhoun supported the Mayor's comments and suggested that serious consideration be given to putting the $10,555 back in for the carpet tiles.  A resolution dealing with this was considered at the Council meeting.  Comment: Not one Councillor picked up on or responded when the architect suggested that if Council put forward a budget for the project he would work towards that budget.   The majority of councillors were either gung ho about the whole project or said nothing.  When I queried the Treasurer, Ken Watson and the Chair of Corporate Services, Lou Guerriero after the meeting about whether there was a budget for this project I was told that you don't do that; you would never do it that way.  This means not only was this NOT PUT OUT TO TENDER but also THERE IS NO BUDGET.  Naturally the architect is going to go as high end as possible – the higher the cost of the construction the more money he makes.  Who is minding the store?  Who is overseeing this project?  Why would granite counter tops be considered in the first place?  When I asked about the $800 door hardware that was mentioned I was assured that included the door as well.  Let's hope so.  Why can't the doors that are currently in the Health Unit Building be used?  We better hope that the furniture from the current Town Offices and the existing Health Unit are “comfortable” and are a fit or who knows how much that could cost.  Why do the councillors need sky lights in the Council chambers?  This project needs to be examined and major savings need to be found.  I for one would be “proud” if the Council would be more fiscally responsible.  A Town Office needs to be functional, not luxurious. 

   2,  A letter was received from the Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit thanking the Town for their support and assistance in the delivery of the H1N1 immunization clinics.

 

Development Services.

1.  Two shore road closures were dealt with, both on the Severn River.

2.  Comments from the Gravenhurst Environmental Advisory Committee regarding the proposed Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw.  These were to be considered at the Planning Council meeting on December 16.

3.  Minutes of the November 10 meeting of the Municipal Heritage Committee – Mayor Klinck questioned the Proposal for a Municipal Heritage Facility.  Council liaison, Mark Clairmont, replied that this was a recommendation by Heritage Committee Member, Richard Tatley, and endorsed by the Committee that in future planning a Heritage Component be considered for the Carnegie Library Building.  There are no specific plans at this time.

 

Economic Development

1.  Amy Taylor presented a Transportation Committee Update.  Seven people have come forward to serve on this Committee.  A resolution was passed approving the terms of reference and the appointment of the following members – Allan Denne, Ardena McKelvey, Evelyn Matson, Glenn Norman, Pat Loewen, Roy Kerr, Stephen King and Tracy Wilson as the Council liaison.  The first meeting was held on December 3 and the next meeting will be held in early January.

2.  Ontario Trillium Foundation Funding Update – The Town applied to the Ontario Trillium Foundation in March, 2009.  The initial application was deferred to July 1 due to a large intake of applications.  The funding application was approved in early November.  This application was made to purchase portable bleachers, staging and sound equipment to be used at various Town Events and could also be made available to other organizations for their events, at the Town's discretion.  The equipment must be purchased and in use with 12 months of the Agreement.  A by-law was passed at Council to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute an agreement with the Ontario Trillium Foundation.

3.  Ontario Winter Games – this is the co-hosting agreement for the Winter Games. A by-law was passed at the Council meeting authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to Execute an agreement for the Ontario Winter Games.

 

COUNCIL MEETING

 

As well as the above noted by-laws Council also passed a by-law to deem part of a registered plan not to be registered – Saddington, Kashe Lake.

 

New Business

1.  Community Centre & Aquatic Centre – engineering component – proposal from C.C.Tatham & Associates re site servicing and stormwater management works.  Estimated fee is $25,200 excluding GST and expense. Carried.

2.  Municipal Office – A resolution was passed to proceed with the construction/renovation of the new Municipal Office. 


Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Council Notes                       December 1, 2009       Without Prejudice

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.   

Council met in closed session re possible acquisition/disposition of land.  No resolution came forward from the closed session. 

Deputations:

  1. Melissa Halford and District Council Graydon Smith re Muskoka Active Transportation Program.  Feedback was requested on:  proposed preliminary AT network; interest in sharing and coordinating joint projects; and other area municipal projects that should be considered.  The next steps are Open Houses to be held Dec. 16 at 6pm in Bracebridge at the District Council Chamber and Dec. 17 at 1pm in Huntsville (Partner's Hall).  They are requesting comments by Feb. 19, 2010.
  2. Moreen Miller from the Ontario Stone, Sand & Gravel Association re Aggregate Management.  They would like an opportunity to work with planning staff to update the municipal regulations re aggregate resource management.  The OSSGA is a non profit organization representing over 200 businesses.

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Community Services

  1. CS&P Architects Presentation of Schematic Design for the Centennial Centre Expansion and Aquatic Facility – this was similar to the presentation at the public meeting held Monday evening – Nov. 30.    The architects stated that the design meets the needs of the community but stays within the budget.  The project will be approximately 56,000 square feet – this includes a 25 metre pool 4 lane pool and a leisure pool, pool office/first aid area, pool viewing area, fitness centre, gymnasium, two group exercise rooms, five change rooms, child minding room, YMCA administration area,  YMCA administration area, and storage/tunnel/mechanical area. The arena side includes 6 change rooms, two family change rooms, two referees rooms, arena workshop, Junior A change room, pro shop, re-located Olympia garage, Community Services Dept administration area, Terry Fox room with commercial kitchen, community meeting room and a dryland training/program room.  A “main street” open space area connects the Centennial Centre side to the Pool/Fitness Centre side.  Many public comments were received after the public open house.  Some members of the public are concerned that a 4lane lap pool is not big enough – at least 6 lanes are required.  Other concerns were raised about the parking area at the Winewood Ave. entrance – many feel this should be kept as green space and that the skateboard facility should remain in that location.  A walking track is desired by many – a rubberized track around the arena ice surface is being considered.  70,000 square feet were requested for the project and this is down to 53,000 square feet to stay within budget.  Setbacks from the railroad tracks have to be considered as well as the existing Childcare Facility and Seniors Centre on the site.  The main entrance route is planned from Church Street with the majority of parking on that side.  Much discussion took place but a resolution was passed at the Council meeting directing CS&P Architects to proceed to the Design Development and Contract Documents stage based on the proposed schematic drawings.  Discussion will continue to take place.

COMMENT:  There is a lot of anger and disappointment in the community about the design put forward.  This is the only design presented to the public and considered by Council.  The writer feels that Council is not communicating well with the public.  Is there another way of addressing the concerns of many citizens but still keeping within the budget and space available?  Is this going to provide the best range of programs to the public?  We realize that many, many hours have been put into this by the Building Committee and perhaps this is the best design for our community.  We also realize the time constraints to meet the funding requirements.  However, the public deserves to hear the reasoning behind the design and what this is going to achieve for the community.

2. Committee passed a resolution to waive the fees for the Literacy Society of South Muskoka for their annual Family Day on February 27, 2010

3. Minutes Communities in Bloom Meetings Sept. 24 and Oct. 7.

4.  Minutes of Building Committee – Centennial Centre Expansion & Aquatic Facility – November 5/09.

 

Public Works

  1. Pinetree Road Bridge Weight Restriction – This bridge is showing signs of wear and age and will be presented for replacement as a Capital Project in the 2010 budget.  For now a by-law was passed at the Council meeting limiting total vehicle to a maximum of 5 tonnes.
  2. Wharf Board Minutes – Sept. 9 and Oct. 14.

 

Development Services

  1. SRC – Kashe Lake  - Committee passed a resolution to declare the lands surplus so that the lands can be sold.
  2. Gravenhurst Environmental Advisory Committee minutes Oct.27.

 

Economic Development

  1. Transportation Committee Update – committee to be created to explore the feasibility of a Trolley/Transit System for Gravenhurst.  An ad was placed on the Town Page of the Banner seeking expressions of interest from the public.  Three letters were received so the ad was placed again as the Committee required a minimum of 7 members.  Seven members have now expressed an interest in the Committee and a meeting is to be held to discuss the mandate and next steps for the Committee.
  2. Torch Relay – street banners have been received. There are 4 sets of 3 designs.  These will replace the existing banners along Muskoka Rd and will stay up until the end of March.  None of the 5 torch bearers are from Gravenhurst but 2 from Gravenhurst will be participating elsewhere.

 

Corporate Services

  1. 2010 Budget Guidelines and Direction to Staff – Committee passed a resolution requesting staff to:  Increase municipal fees and charges by 3% to reflect operational costs.

   Increase service levels only where they can be accomplished without increasing the existing budget.

   Maintain 2009 staffing levels.  Movement of part time staff or contract staff to full time  will require justification through a separate report to the C.A.O. and will be considered during budget deliberations.

  Each department is to review their preventative maintenance program to ensure the appropriate investment is being made in the maintenance of municipal assets.

  Adjust non-union staff grid by the 12 month average Consumer Price Index, calculated as of October , 2009

  Identify and investigate energy efficiency initiatives.

The staff report identified anticipated 2010 impacts: 

   Union Contracts, Outside & Inside and non union salary and wages $Impact - $136,724; Taxation Impact 1.8%

   New debt payments for Medical Centre (cost of servicing) $Impact - $60,000 Taxation Impact 0.8%

   New debt payments for Municipal Office Purchase (Current Health Unit Building $Impact - $240,000 Taxation Impact 3.2%

             HST – 6 month impact - $Impact $100,000 Taxation Impact 1.33%

             Reduction of levy subsidy from landfill sale to District - $Impact $75.000 Taxation                              Impact 1.0%

       The treasurer notes that support to Doctor retention and recruitment, cost of new municipal office and G8 impacts to operations will need to be determined and considered in budget deliberations. These are not included in the above increases.  Comment:  The GGRA continues to urge restraint.  The Identified Increased Costs add up to over 8% increase in the municipal taxation.  Increased assessment will offset some of this but it looks like we are headed toward a hefty increase in the municipal property tax bill.  Council has put themselves in this position – the heavy debt load leaves them with no flexibility.

  1. License Agreement re: 2010 G8 Logo – If Gravenhurst wants to use the G8 logo they must have a License Agreement. At the Council meeting a by-law was passed authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to execute the license agreement respecting non-commercial use of the Official Mark for the 2010 Muskoka G8 Summit.
  2. The CAO gave a verbal update on the proposed new municipal office.  The CAO and treasurer met with the architect to address the concerns re costs that were raised at the November 17 Committee meeting.  The architect has started to tweak the design and a report will come forward at the December 15 meeting.  The architect and contractor will attend that meeting. To have a move in date of May 1, 2010 everything will have to be signed off by Christmas.  Drawings should arrive within the week and everything can be looked at and costed out. 
  3. Minutes of Accessibility Committee October 15.

Overall Comment:   The Committee was in a giving mood despite the fact that there were applications which were problematic.  There were few questions or discussion of the items presented.    First, 2 applications were  approved  where the project is built and there is neither permit nor planning permission.  Second, the committee is ignoring frontage requirements, not by small amount but by as much as 100%.    This is repeated time and again.   

Committee of Adjustment 

Bartman          Loon Lake  This was before the September meeting and at that time was deferred.   He applied to legalize a building and deck built without permit and to gain permission for increased shoreline development.  The shoreline development area will increase by almost 50% and the factor by 90%.  At the time this was queried as to whether this is minor and whether the committee should condone illegal behaviour.  A site visit was made and without discussion the committee approved the request                   Approved 

McClure         Taylor Island, Lake Muskoka  Here is a request to create a lot which is too small for the narrow channel on which it is located District is opposed.  Town staff have asked for the newly severed lot to be a bit enlarged, but no survey is provided.  The mitigating factors on this proposal to create a severely undersized lot are enlarging the lot and shoreline development limitations. Approved

Comment:   It appears that the creation of new lots trumps the OP and zoning by-law requirements for the planner and the committee.  We should encourage the planners to adopt a more strict approach to these requests.   There is no justification for the leniency repeatedly shown.   It is this ignoring of rules in the past which has created many of the land use problems we see in the town and on the lakes.   

Mortagage Insurance Company of Canada Severn River

They own 2 100 acre parcels  water access on the river.  They want to create 9 new lots in total.  The neighbours want them to make provision for future road access.  This request was ignored.   Approved 

Patlyn Company (Packham)  Morrison Lake

Want to obtain a legal right of way over an existing private road (Cove Rd.) Approved 

Sutherland                  Kahshe Lake

Want to obtain a legal right of way over an existing private road (FR 20T)     Approved 

Trott                Baseline road

Wants to sever a large parcel at the corner of Baseline and Canning road.  District is opposed as the area is aggregate resources.  Neighbour wants it to be kept agricultural with larger lots.  Staff feel an EIS on the property is required.   Deferred 

Khin Hla Hla              Southwood Road   Severn Bridge

Wants to sever a lot and then attach the severed piece to a lot at the rear.  From looking at the maps and plans they are positioning this as an entrance to a possible future subdivision.   Approved 

Daniels           Rankin Island, Lake Muskoka

He owns 2 lots.  Wants to sever a potion of one and attach it to another and then to create 3 lots with the required 90 metre frontage. Approved

Comment:     here we see a problem with just one part of the picture being presented.  This is part of a larger application for zoning variances which came before council on the 28th.     I would encourage the complete intention of the project to be shared with the committee, rather than just the narrow portion they are considering.   

Levere & Cousineau Sparrow Lake

Built deck too close to the water along with stairs.  Did not get the necessary permits Now wants to regularize these structures.  Approved 

Veroba & Ward         Sparrow Lake

Has a very small lot and now wants reduced side yards approved so he can build a large 2 storey house.  They want the septic on the lake side of the building just 15 metres from the water. Staff feel that the request is out of character with the area and the neighbours are opposed.   Because of these reservations the applications was   Deferred 

Loughhead      Philip Street

Requesting reduced setbacks for a storage shed.  Neighbour objected.  Approved

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Council notes        October 6, 2009                                  without prejudice

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website.  

This was a long meeting with 7 deputations and updates to several projects. 

Deputations:

The mayor’s golf tournament raised $30,000 which has now been presented to the Boat and Heritage centre for their education programs.

The Salvation Army will begin the Christmas kettle campaign on November 21.  They need volunteers.

Solterra Co-housing developers.  This real estate agent and developer informed council of a new model of shared housing for seniors.  Between 5 and 14 seniors buy their bedroom and a portion of the common spaces in a house and pay monthly fees to the developer’s company for management plus fees for services such as housekeeping, laundry, cooking, maintenance, etc.   The arrangement hinges on the ownership structure which is land registry tenants in common, not condominium or co-operative law.

Comment:  this is like a retirement or group home with none of the safety or legislative requirements imposed on such homes, as the residents are supposedly in control of the home, i.e. there is no operator.   Dependence on such a shared responsibility residence would seem to leave the seniors with no protection for their investment or person.   When asked about zoning requirements the response was there are none as it is equivalent to a family residence.  When asked what the sales pitch is she did not answer.  There is one under development in Bracebridge.  This could be a long term time bomb for residents and the operator because senior needs and capacities change with time and the model appears to be built on other assumptions.  The zoning issue means that the planning department will have to consider this in the new zoning by-law.    

Southwood Church  two of the deputations were to save the church.  They were moving and emotional arguing about the importance of this historic gem on a well travelled route.  To date $25,000 plus labour has been pledged to restoration.  The church structure is not as bad as portrayed and it should be restored and preserved.  It needs to be designated.    The delegations asked that the council rescind the earlier decision to demolish the church.  This was done later in the meeting.  The only councillor to oppose the motion to rescind was Bob Colhoun.

Comment:  the Southwood church, if restored, could be a heritage and economic development resource for the community if it is used in contexts such as events, heritage tours, cultural tours and trail development.  It needs to be restored and designated and then the heritage committee needs to make sure that the events planning and the heritage tours include it.  For example; the town could have a thanksgiving weekend event, tours of the fall colours and a harvest thanksgiving festival at various sites, including the Southwood Church.  Put the wonderful Severn Bridge WI ladies with the Southwood group and traditional thanksgiving suppers could be organized.  Have the farmers market do a special thanksgiving market at the site that weekend.     Then add a guided night sky visit to the Torrance Barrens dark sky preserve.  I bet that this could draw many visitors to our area.   It only requires imagination, planning and the involvement of others.

Transportation   After Evelyn Matson proposed that the town implement a heritage themed trolley to link the wharf, uptown and south end shopping areas the seniors centre decided that they were interested in a broader transportation option for seniors.  They asked the town to strike a committee to look at transportation needs and develop a plan.  This was approved.

Torrance Barrens Dark Sky Preserve   Mike Silver talked to the council about the need for a dark sky by-law as without one the preserve could be lost.  Private signs and commercial lighting are becoming a big problem.  A by-law creates a level playing field for businesses, is enforceable, conveys standards and helps preserve an economic resource.  The Preserve has a high national and international profile and is a tourism generator.  There is an event October 17 and special sky viewing after dark.  He offered to help with drafting a by-law. 

Updates

Centennial Centre expansion and the new aquatic facility.   A committee has been struck including non town members to advise on design.  There will be a public open house for input as well.  The architect is chosen and the $1.6 million contract will be signed.

Communities in Bloom The town won 5 blooms this year at the national awards.  The lowest score was in the category of trees and urban forestry.  We need an inventory of the trees.  The winter lights will not be in competition this year.

The tornado   Most of the cleanup is done.  The free brush tipping has expired.  Cost to date for public works is $109 thousand.  Outstanding bills include equipment rental, contractors’ services and outstanding work.  This exceeds the current budget so other activities will be adjusted.

Gull Lake Rotary Park lost 30 mature pines and other trees.  A tree replanting dedication program will be put in place so people can donate to the cost of replacement trees.  Name plaques will be made for the donors.  Costs of replanting will be $26 thousand.  The pine logs from the trees taken down will be rough sawn on site with a portable saw mill, the lumber will be used in the new centennial centre and also the public will be asked for suggestions.  There is approx. $10 thousand worth of lumber.   Community services has spent approx $25 thousand on their clean up.

Muskoka Road Streetscape  the agreement for the G8 money is now awaiting Federal approval and signature.  The lighting and street furniture will be the same as that on the already built south end.  LED bulbs will be installed in the existing and new lights. 

Ontario Youth Winter Games  5 sites in town need 150 volunteers

Zoning by-law open house   about 60 to 70 people attended.  There will be a draft by-law in about a month available for the public. 

New Business

A by-law was enacted prohibiting stopping on Edward Street between Muskoka Road South and Clarence Street.  The new south end plaza has generated a lot of traffic on the street.

A shore road closure on Kahshe Lake was approved.  the land is now surplussed.

The condominium approval for the Moonlight Bay Condo on Gull Lake was extended

The new town logo will be launched in 2010.

Budget   Lou Guerriero asked council to tell him what kind of public input they want for the 2010 budget.  He implicitly indicated that the 2009 model did not work well.  T. Pilger suggested that there should be a public forum earlier in the process.  Mark suggested electronic input.

Comment:  if public input is to be of use it must be based on sound information and occur early enough in the process that it can be included.  It could probably be best done department by department in a public forum where understanding and comment could be gained and then the overall reviewed.  There is no reason that face to face and electronic should be treated as exclusive options. 

 

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

 

Gravenhurst Council Planning Notes        September 22, 2009           without prejudice 

 

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. To see background papers go to the town website. 

The meeting is known as planning council as matters before it primarily relate to land use planning matters.   There were 6 planning matter plus 2 other business items. 

The planning matters

Loon lake                 Chaim

He wants to build onto his cottage towards the lake.  The addition will place the cottage 4 metres (12 feet) closer (21.7 to 17.7 metres setback) and he will add a deck to reduce the total setback to  16.8 metres.  The lot is small and the result is a significant increase in the shoreline development.  He will also build a garage within 1 metre of the side lot line.

The neighbours wrote asking that he be required to provide a survey as the current survey markers are inaccurate and have been known to move.  This request was not put into effect.  T.Pilger did ask who is responsible if the lack of a survey creates an encroachment.  It is the applicant.          Approved 

Kahshe Lake           Burnt Island             Newton

This is a designation change from open space to residential waterfront.  An aquatic impact assessment recommended 30 metre setback and a dock location.  The KLRA had no objection.                                                           Approved 

South Muldrew Lake                     Smallfield

In anticipation of the change in setback they applied for and got a site plan on title with a 20 metre setback.  The necessary zoning was approved along with a fee waiver. 

Silver Lake               Redpath

As with Smallfield above a site plan agreement was registered with a 20 metre setback instead of 30 metres.  Zoning provision and fee waiver were Approved 

Sunny Lake             Seck

They want to build a 2d shed 25 metres back from the shore.  The house is only 20 metres and the decks are 16 metres back so no greater lake impact results.                       Approved 

Loon Lake                Roth and Deller

The OMB overturned a previous council decision refusing a severance on Berkishaw Island.  The result: the existing dwelling on Henry Island is permitted and a new lot and dwelling are approved for Berkishaw Island and the existing structures will be recognized.  The neighbours are very unhappy.  The necessary by-law was                                                                          Approved 

Other business

The Wharf 

A new storage building will be constructed behind the ambulance building at James and North Muldrew Lake Road along with a driveway and a parking lot for 6  vehicles.   

The Centennial Centre Expansion

It has been decided to hire a project construction manager for the expansion project to represent the town’s interests.  It has also been decided to request proposals from those interested in operating the facility.

Advertisements will be placed immediately in the local papers and in Toronto papers seeking expressions of interest and proposals.  The decisions will likely be made October 9th and a special meeting of council might be necessary October 13.  town staff,  the architect plus reps from the town advisory committees, the senior and day care centres and hockey will be invited to comment and input.

There will likely be public input sessions as well.

They want to move this project along as fast as possible.

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Council Notes                        September 15, 2009       Without Prejudice 

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.   

Council met in closed session re litigation or potential litigation and re land acquisition or disposition matter.  This had to do with the Home Building Centre property and the Centennial Centre expansion and aquatic centre.  A resolution was brought forward at council. 

Deputations:

  1. Introduction of Planscape re Zoning By-law Update – Greg Corbett and Brad Noble of Planscape were introduced.  They will work with planning staff on the comprehensive zoning by-law. They outlined the planning framework.  The first public open house is to be held October 3 in the Terry Fox Room of the Centennial Centre.  They are aiming for a three month turnaround with the passing of the new by-law by the end of November or early December.
  2. Katie Pellerin of the Muskoka Trails Council.  Ms. Pellerin thanked the Town of Gravenhurst for their donation of $200 which enabled the Trails Council to attend the Ontario Trails Conference.  She gave an update of the conference and also reported on the first Muskoka Amazing Race.  This was very successful and they were able to fund raise over $10,000. 
  3. Midwives of Muskoka – fee waiver request.  They were again asking council to waive the $264.45 ticket printing cost for an event held at the Opera House.  This was brought forward at the Aug. 18 meeting and refused.  Councillor Sandy Cairns asked that it be brought forward under the Corporate Services portion of the meeting.
  4. Evelyn Matson re Trolley Service – Evelyn made a presentation regarding the town providing a trolley service to connect the three main retail areas – the Wharf, Uptown and the SouthendPlaza.  She proposes a trolley similar to the Santa's Village trolley in Bracebridge.  The Town could apply to various programs for funding to cover most if not all of the capital costs to purchase the trolley and revenue for operating costs could be raised through advertising, donations and possible rental of the trolley for special events.  Evelyn had letters of support from the BIA, Chamber, and various merchants and provided Council with copies of comments received from the public.  Sandy Cairns supported the idea; Terry Pilger supported the idea by asking that a staff report be back to the Economic Development Committee; Paisley Donaldson had reservations because of the purchase cost of $85,000 to $100,000.  Evelyn reiterated that most of the capital expense can be covered through funding but agreed that if funding was not available that the town cannot afford this expense.  Mark Clairmont feels it is worth looking into.Evelyn emphasized that she was presenting this as a private citizen and that it is not a GGRA initiative.  COMMENT;  Hopefully a staff report will be brought forward early in October.  It is refreshing to see a resident with so much enthusiasm and a real desire to promote Gravenhurst.  
  5. Municipal Heritage Committee re Southwood Church – Hank Smith, Chair of the Municipal Heritage Committee was asking Council to defer, when adopting  the September 1st, 2009 Committee of the Whole minutes, the resolution directing staff to have the Southwood Church demolished.  That resolution gave the Heritage committee until October 31st to inspect the building and identify if there any any salvageable items that could be saved as heritage pieces.  Mr. Smith stated that the Heritage Committee needs time to follow process.  They will be visiting the site the week of week of September 21 and would like to make a presentation to Council in due time.  Later at the Council meeting Mark Clairmont asked that the aforementioned resolution be reconsidered.  The request to reconsider was lost and the adoption of the minutes as presented was approved.  Comment:  Why was this simple request of a Committee of Council denied?

Community Services

  1. David Grass, YMCA re Centennial Centre Expansion and Aquatic Centre – Potential Partnership.  David Grass spoke of the YMCA's proposal for potential partnership in running the facility.  He outlined the history of the Y and how they have effectively partnered with other municipalities.  Mayor John Klinck expressed his appreciation for all the the Y has contributed to date but expressed that Council is obligated to look at all models and proposals.  Tracy Wilson wondered what would happen to the current programs that are run by the Town through the Recreation & Community Services Department.  Comment:  An article in the Banner the next day indicated that another would be operator has complained about the perception that the YMCA is getting this contract.  This is what lies behind the mayor's comment.  Any process for awarding the right to run the facility must take into account many factors, such as assistance for low income users, costs to the town, fee structure for users, range of programs and experience of the applicant.  There are other factors. We do not want a public facility run on a for-profit basis by others.
  2. Selection of Architect – Centennial Centre & Expansion Centre – Interviews with the five firms that submitted expressions of interest were followed up by reference checks of the two front runners – CS&P of Toronto and Evans Bertrand Hill Wheeler Architecture of North Bay.  The interview team recommended CS & P Architects as the lead architect for the design and construction of the project.  The resolution was carried at the Council meeting.

Development Services

  1. Gravenhurst Environmental Advisory Committee  - Committee passed a resolution approving the GEAC Terms of Reference.
  2. Gravenhurst Environmental Advisory Committee Presentation.  Danny Epstein spoke on behalf of the GEAC  “In Pursuit of Community Sustainability”.  The GEAC proposes that Gravenhurst adopt a framework within which strategic actions can be identified to secure this community for current and future generations.  To drive this framework the committee is proposing a set of principles to guide Council.  The GEAC's current mandate is to provide advise to Council on a wide range of environmental issues that will support the sustainability of Gravenhurst.  They could take on the role of working with the community to develop and overall Vision for Gravenhurst.  They feel that having a vision that the community at large buys into and that has the political commitment to follow is the real starting point of moving towards a sustainable community.  The GEAC has talked to the various department heads of the Town and has invited community groups to a workshop focusing on environmental issues facing the Town.  This will be held on September 26 at the Terry Fox Room at the Centennial Centre.  Comment – Council asked few questions and seemed disinterested in the idea.  WE consider it important and will to work with the Environmental Advisory Committee
  3. Request to Extend Conditions of Draft Approval North Lake Estates Subdivision – The proposed plan of subdivision is located west of Highway  11 and abuts the north side of Picard Lane, Kilworthy.  This is the fourth request for an extension to the original draft approval.  Committee passed the resolution recommending that the District of Muskoka approve a further two year extension.
  4. Site Plan Approval – Committee approved a Site Plan Agreement for A.P.Monk Optometry, Professional Corporation for an addition to the rear of his existing building.  The proposed two storey addition will contain a garage on the ground floor and an apartment on the upper floor.

                                        

Economic Development

  1.  Ontario Youth Winter Games Opening Ceremonies – The Opening Ceremonies Committee has expressed concerns about the Wharf special events field ability to support the 5000+ attendees and about parking.  Site visits have occurred and staff and the Opening Ceremonies Committee remain confident that the field will accommodate the group and that there is sufficient parking onsite or close by to accommodate the vehicular traffic.  Public Works will need to plow and lift snow throughout the winter to prepare the site for the Ceremonies.  The Opening Ceremonies committee is expecting that the Town of Gravenhurst will assume the costs of snow removal from the parking lots and grooming of the snow on the event field and entry points.  Committee passed a resolution directing staff to continue to dialogue and work with the OWG Opening Ceremonies Committee and that the Committee agrees to budget the required financial resources to prepare the field and remove snow.

Corporate Services

  1. Committee discussed extending the waiving of the landfill tipping fees for residents affected by the August storm.  At the council meeting a resolution was passed approving the extension until October 6.
  2. Gravenhurst Development Charges Timeline – Council Presentation – Dec. 12, 2008; Notice of Public Meeing – Sept.23, 2009; Study to be Completed and Available – Oct. 6, 2009; Public Open House – Oct 9, 2009; Public Meeting – Oct 20,2009; Passage of By-law – Nov.17, 2009.
  3. A resolution to waive the fees at the Opera House for Midwives of Muskoka was lost.

Council

As well as the already noted resolutions , Council passed a by-law to authorize the Mayor and CAO to execute an agreement with the Minister of Energy and Infrastructure and Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs for Building Canada Fund – Communities Component. This is for the grant money for the Centennial Centre Expansion and Aquatic Centre.

A resolution was passed regarding 290 Church Street (Home Building Centre property) to enact a termination notice of the lease. Mayor Klinck explain that the six month notice falls into place with the Home Building Centre plans for their new building and for the expansion of the Centennial Centre.  There is flexibility on the part of Home Hardware and the Town.

Meeting adjourned

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Committee of Adjustment        September 16, 2009     without prejudice 

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this report relates what happened at the meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA promotes greater access to information and accountability.  To see background papers go to the town website.   

The committee of adjustment deals with minor variances.  The applications were straightforward and only one had issues.  Six of the 7 applications were speedily approved. 

Barkway                   Hopkins

He wants to grant a right of way for the neighbours.  The existing driveway crosses his lot.                                                                            Approved 

Pine Lake                 Alafogiannis

They want to decrease the side yard distance for a new larger cottage that they are building.  Plus they want to increase the shoreline development permissions to build a boathouse.     The vegetation on the lot has been denuded.  The lot is one of several with small frontages on this area of Pine Lake. This area of the lake is registering higher on phosphate levels than the areas with larger frontages and adequate vegetation. Approved

Comment; these people built a 2 story garage with no permit and put habitable space above, this is not permitted.  When the town refused them permission after the fact they change tactics and decided to attach the garage to the house, this is why the larger cottage with a breezeway.  The lack of vegetation on the lake side of the property is serious given the phosphorus situation on the lake.   A request was made by the public to impose a condition that a re-vegetation plan be developed using native plants prior to final permission.  This did not get incorporated.   Pine lake does not have site plan control requirements. 

Brown and Greavette Streets     Holstock

They want to increase the size of the rear deck and recognize the location of a shed which is too close to the lot lines.  A neighbour objected as the information circulated was inaccurate.    They might relocate the shed.                         Deferred 

Loon Lake                            Tufts

They want to extend the existing open deck and go 2.4 metres closer to the lake.  This is to increase deck size and add steps.  They will also be putting stairs down the rock to the lake.                                                                                                Approved 

Lake Muskoka                     Burden

Numerous variances are being asked for: shoreline development factors and area, setbacks from the water for a sleeping cabin and the cottage and new decks plus permission to have 2 boathouses.   This property is old development and most of the buildings are nonconforming.  It is the proposed additions which brought this situation forward.  The lot is large, but is a point of land, which makes for the setback situations.    The neighbours support the application.                                    Approved

Muskoka Bay                                  Christoff

The want to connect existing decks at the side and front of the cottage.  This would mean that a corner of the deck would be 4 instead of 6 metres from the lot line.  The cottage siting is such that this would not affect the neighbour and there is lots of vegetation.   Approved 

Pine lake                   Kinnear

This is another old property with existing nonconforming buildings.  In this case 2 old cottages.  They want to put an addition on one of the cottages which would bring it only 29.2 metres from the water instead of the required 30.  The property is heavily vegetated and there would be no impact on the water quality or on the neighbours.  Approved

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Council Notes          September 1, 2009             Without Prejudice

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.

Council met in closed session re 2 litigation matters and 1 property matter. No resolutions came out of the closed session. Councillor Guerriero was absent as he was away on holidays.

 

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Council notes         August 25, 2009                  without prejudice 

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.  With the change to minimize the content of the town minutes these notes are the most complete record available to the public. To see background papers go to the town website  

This meeting is called planning council and most of the meeting was devoted to zoning changes for individual properties.  The exceptions were:  the closed session was about litigation and the council decided to pay for the tipping fees for those affected by the tornado. 

The items heard were 

Sharpe Street W.           Webb & Campbell

The former church on the corner of Sharpe and John has been converted into a residence.  It is designated residential and zoned accordingly.  They want to change the designation and zoning to commercial to enable a purchaser to have flexibility.  There is no off-street parking.   As the property is adjacent to commercial properties, this was                         Approved 

Harvie Street                 6032176 Canada Inc.

The little plaza, formerly site of Pizza Station, is gradually being converted to apartments, 9 in total.  This application is to add the remaining 3.  There were concerns about parking, room for emergency vehicles to access the rear and snow removal.                                  Approved 

Lake Muskoka Taylor island            Sher

They want permission to build a sleeping cabin 12 metres back from the water.  Staff see it as OK as the site is heavily vegetated.  The neighbours object as the channel is narrow and there will be an impact from more buildings closer to the shore.  The drawings submitted show a boathouse and dock development as well.  There is no indication of stairs or other decks within the shoreline development area.  The total shoreline development area allowed is 1500 square feet.  The drawings show greater square footage.  Council did not do the math as to the totals.   Staff like the applications the neighbours do not. 

Comment:  this is a piecemeal application so the applications will have to be watched as the drawings show greater square footage.   Will council remember or will staff remind them?                     Approved 

Severn Bridge      Southwood Road                   Martin

He wants to sever his lot and have it rezoned to the residential community zone.  2 new lots will be created with 90 metre setbacks because of the rail line. Approved 

Kahshe Lake                  O’Brien

This is an estate shared by siblings who want to sever the 2 existing old cottages into 2 lots.  Building locations at the waters edge will be recognized.  New septic systems will be a condition of the severance.                                       Approved 

Gull Lake                       Hill

This is the property right adjacent to the highway at the narrows.  The 2 existing lots which have inadequate frontage will be recognized.  Approved 

Reay Road           Stanhope investments

This is the KOA property.  The CofA approved the creation of a new lot for storage purposes and now the zoning change to allow storage and to recognize the existing inadequate setback from the road is           Approved 

Severn River        Mortgage Insurance Company of Canada (Seaton)

The large lot on the Severn was approved by the CofA for creating 4 new additional lots.  Now these need rezoning to recognize an Environmental Protection zone and the rest as waterfront residential.            Approved 

Severn River                  Flanagan

This long protracted severance process continues.  After completion of an environmental Impact study Mr. Flanagan received approval to create 4 new lots with conditions as to dock location and size.  Parks Canada, the Trent-Severn Waterway authority, will not approve the very long docks required.  Mr. Flanagan is asking that the conditions relevant to docks on the property be amended to allow no docks or boathouses on the new lots.  The long saga is now hopefully finished as this was                                                                    Approved

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Committee of Adjustment  August 19, 2009             without prejudice 

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this report relates what happened at the meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA promotes greater access to information and accountability.  With the change to minimize the content of the town minutes these notes are the most complete record available to the public. To see background papers go to the town website.   

The committee of adjustment deals with minor variances.  The applications were straightforward and had few issues and only one application was deferred. 

Muskoka Beach Road                     Schofield Holdings

This is a previous application which was held until the District could specify required conditions.  These are now received and agreed to.  The severance was          Approved 

Muskoka Beach Road                     Jones

They have a large backlot with a narrow driveway entrance.  They want to sever a portion of the lot and sell it to the neighbour where it will be deemed (attached) to his lot.                                    Approved     

Kilworthy                              Mastaler

They want a severance but the property needs cleanup as it is littered with old vehicles and boats.  This condition is applied and the severance.             Approved 

Reay Road                            Stanhope Investments

They want to sever a portion of this large property to create a lot for storage buildings.  This is an existing use.                        Approved 

Silver Lake Road                Adams

He received approval for a severance a year ago, but did not fulfill the conditions in the required one year time.  This reapplication is required.                         Approved 

Muskoka Beach Road         Watson

The applicant is the town treasurer and he owns lots in the Muskoka Beach community.  He has put two of them together and wants to build a large house and hence requires side and front yard reductions and extra lot coverage.  The neighbour objects as he opposes the reduced setbacks and wants tree cover to be kept.                     Approved 

Barkway Road                     Seehaver

He wants reduced setbacks for an existing house and a proposed porch addition. Approved 

Lake Muskoka Taylor Island                    Sherlock

This is a small frontage lot on the island facing the mainland at a narrow passage.  He wants to build a large boathouse and docks.   The neighbours object as it will interfere with their swimming area and the variance is not minor, it will double the shoreline development area and factor.  The staff recommended that this be Deferred.  The committee agreed. 

Muskoka Bay                        Allen

This property is close to the narrows.  They want to rebuild their boathouse and go slightly larger, add stairs and a deck to the cottage only 12 metres setback.   Approved 

Clearwater Lake                             Dawe

He is replacing his cottage and wants to build the existing 17.9 metres from the water.  Other buildings and the dock require 0 metre setbacks.  An encroachment on the neighbouring property will be removed.                      Approved 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Council notes        August 18, 2009                                   without prejudice 

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.  With the change to minimize the content of the town minutes these notes are the most complete record available to the public. To see background papers go to the town website.   

Special note: see the item about Fine Films and the dates for the movies. 

The public consultation date for the ward options will be October 3 at the Opera House.   

This was an uneventful and routine meeting except for the discussion about how to handle cases where people have built without a permit. 

Fine Films is a new organization come together to present in Gravenhurst award winning films which do not get shown in the commercial theatres.  This is similar to Spinning Reels in Bracebridge and Reel Alternatives in Huntsville.  They will be using the Opera House for 8 screenings and are requesting that the rental fees be waived this year, so they can establish and then assess their success.  The dates are September 15, October 20, November 17, January 19, February 16, March 16, April 20 and May 18.   Tickets cost $6.00 in advance at Penny Varney’s or $7.00 at the door.  A season’s pass is $48. Council approved the fee waiver

Comment:  what a great project.  Good movies in town the third Tuesday of the month.  It also promotes use of the town “gem” the Opera House.  And it is at a very reasonable cost. 

Muskoka community network  They are funded by FedNor to provide better internet access in Muskoka.  They gave an update: the uptake on the new towers has been faster than predicted, they will be adding more.  Education and a free technology update service are also available for those who register at www.mcnet.ca

Bob colhoun commented that service speeds seem to degrade at times.  The response was that this is at peak use times and that the service has already been upgraded once. 

Ryde Community Co-operative  Provided a report on the active use of the centre and gave a donation to the town. 

Centennial Centre expansion and the new aquatic facility.  The scope of the project was outlined and they are now at the stage of interviewing the 5 architectural firms which have expressed an interest.  A resolution to form committee to interview the applicants in the next week was passed.  The members are: Mahar, Broderick, Klinck, Cairns and a representative of the Simcoe Muskoka YMCA.

Comment:  Your reporter asked Broderick and Donaldson about making sure the Federal and Provincial governments’ expectation re “shovels in the ground by September” is clearly communicated to the public.  Broderick said that having an architect hired is sufficient.  Donaldson will clarify more.   

Communities in Bloom updated their program. 

Development Services matters. 

3 of the 4 items were carryovers from previous decisions.  They were for fee waivers

Kahshe Lake – Paige.    He received permission to sever a large lot, acquire the OSRA in front of 45 metres and buy an original road allowance along the property boundary.  The severed lot will be given to the Muskoka Heritage Trust so the land, which is a large cranberry marsh, will be preserved in its natural state.  As he is making this donation of land Mr. Paige has asked for a waiver of all the town fees – the planning fee, the purchase fee for the OSRA and the road allowance.  Total is estimated at more than $13,000.   He has incurred other costs for surveys etc.

Bob Colhoun expressed concern that Mr. Paige will be getting a charitable donation receipt and now wants more.  This was responded to by the President of the Heritage Trust who explained that if there is a benefit from the process, such as fee waivers, no charitable receipt will be given.

Klinck stressed that the town will net more in taxes than they are giving away and stressed the importance of the property being preserved for people and animals and birds etc.  It is an important natural area on Kahshe Lake.                     The waiver was approved 

Riley Lake and Severn River.  These two requests for fee waiver were based on the fact that errors were made in mapping and calculations at the time of first application.  This required the applicants to do more than is usually necessary and incur fee costs.    Approved 

Building without a permit.

This long standing issue has been raised at planning related meetings as this is where the infractions become public.  Planning matters and permit requirements and enforcement under the building code are separate items.  So the discussion focused on what to do about those people who build without permits.

Right now the Chief Building Official (CBO) exercises a lot of discretion regarding these situations.  There is a low level of punitive enforcement, although the law allows for significant fines and persecution and even removal of structures. 

The manager of development services presented 6 options, which are not mutually exclusive.  These are stay with the status quo, move to a regime of zero tolerance, flag files and make this public, require better documentation such as a survey, raise public awareness by information and education, and increase fees if an infraction is found.

The discussion showed a polarized council, those who thought that the extensive, and lax, discretion of the current regime is OK  - Klinck, B. Pilger and Clairmont, those who like discretion but want less - Guerriero and those who want much tighter enforcement with much less discretion - Colhoun, T. Pilger, Wilson.  Cairns did not express an opinion on the discretion issue.  

Everyone but Clairmont thought better information/education is needed.  Most agreed to extra penalties.  These will come through the fees by-law.

Comment:  it was clear that council members themselves do not know what is permitted without a permit.  This more than makes the case for better information being available.   There was a complete lack of statistics to document the problem such as number of instances and the scope of the infractions, i.e. a full building vs. a repair to a roof or a contractor vs. a homeowner and his family project.   Until there is data it is virtually impossible to develop meaningful strategies for addressing the problem as decisions will be based on opinion not fact and clearly there are very different opinions around the table.    The question of building without adhering to the approved permit was not raised.  Nor was the submission of false information 

The new website is now operating.  Cairns is having trouble navigating it.  

The Draft TOR for the economic strategy committee were tabled.  Not discussed. 

Opera House fee waiver requests

          See Fine films above                   approved

          Muskoka midwives lost money on their fundraiser to cover insurance costs.  Now want the waiver of $264.                                    refused. 

Fire Route 11J (Kahshe Lake) will be renamed Russels Lane 

Questions from the public

          Can the movies be in the afternoon too?

          A property standards matter needs action

          Will the ward review be based solely on population?  The mayor explained that the consultant is looking at several parameters including population and will present options to council along with a recommendation.  The public consultation is October 3 at the Opera House.    

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Council Notes                        August 6, 2009       Without Prejudice 

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.  With the change to minimize the content of the town minutes these notes are the most complete record available to the public. To see background papers go to the town website.   

There was no closed session today.  Councillor Colhoun was absent as he was in Toronto. 

DEPUTATIONS

    There was a presentation to Wayne Hodgson.  He has successfully completed the Ice Making and Painting Technologies course.  This is recognized as a component of the Ontario Recreation Facilities Association's Professional Designation program. 

   A representative of Can West Shows, who put on the In Water Boat Show and Ribfest, appeared with some concerns and suggestions for next year.  He was requesting more flexibility next year.  Parking was a major concern – the temporary “no parking” signs on some streets and the overall lack of parking.  A fishing tournament booked for the same weekend caused chaos.  The exhibitors with trucks & trailers received parking warnings and some were ticketed.  The organizers were informed on the Friday of the event that uniformed police officers were required at the lights – the organizers were required to pay for this and felt it was not necessary.  They want more electrical power in the field for next year.  The concerns will be considered when staff sit down and go over the event with the organizers.   

COMMUNITY SERVICES

  1. Gravenhurst Minor Hockey Association Request for reduction in fees for Ice Time – Deborah Broderick brought forward a report based on the deputation by Minor Hockey at the July 21 Committee meeting.

The current rate for 2009 as approved in the budget is $82.00 per hour plus GST.  GMHA had requested a further subsidized ice rental rate of $60.00 per hour and a new Mite rate of $50.00 per hour.  The current prime time rate is $105.10 plus GST.  Debbie compared Gravenhurst's rate to Bracebridge, Huntsville and Orillia.  She feels part of the reason for GMHA's financial shortfall  is that they are asking for too much ice time for the numbers of players that they have.  Bracebridge's minor hockey uses some non-prime time, such as early morning, and thus the fees are not as high.  Gravenhurst minor hockey does not book any non-prime time.  Several councillors felt there is merit is continuing to dialogue with the interested parties to come up with a solution for next year.  They are particularly supportive of the Mite program which will encourage young kids to join hockey.  Most felt that it is too late in the year to change fees for this year as the 2009 budget was based and approved on the existing fees.

  1. Communities in Bloom Minutes – July 16, 2009.  Debbie Broderick reported the national judges were in town the last week of July.  She acknowledged the dedication and work of Councillor Cairns, chair of Communities in Bloom and also thanked senior staff for their presentations during the round table discussions with the judges.

PUBLIC WORKS

  1. Half Day & Hourly Rental Fees for Muskoka Wharf – At the later Council meeting, Council passed a by-law to amend the fees by-law to allow for half-day and hourly rentals at the Muskoka Wharf and to incorporate charges for the new Opera House ticketing system.

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

  1. Committee passed a resolution do declare lands surplus.  This is to allow for closing a portion of an original shore road allowance (Leithwood – Lake Muskoka).
  2. Home Hardware Stores Limited (Home Building Centre) – Site plan Agreement to allow for the building of the Home Building Centre and related accessory structures at the corner of Musquash Rd. and Muskoka Rd. 169.  This will consist of 20,000 sq. ft. of retail space and 20,000 sq. ft. of additional storage.  The proposed development will be on municipal water and a septic system.  Councillor Guerriero questioned the storm water management.  Councillor Wilson expressed concern that this is another box store and wondered if they could make the entranceway stand out.  Councillor Clairmont also asked if they could “soften” the look.  Councillor Terry Pilger  wondered about a mural on the wall.  The applicants have already agreed to stone work and to have a post and beam entrance.  The Mayor said he is delighted to have Home Building Centre at this entrance to town, as well as the Canadian Tire at the south entrance.  The resolution approving the site plan was carried.

CORPORATE SERVICES

  1. Library Board Request for New Reserve Fund – the Library has received a bequest from an individual's estate in the amount of $60,000 and the funds were temporarily deposited into the Library Equipment Reserve. The Library Board has requested that a new reserve fund be set up to receive donations or endowments from the public.  The funds would be used for the acquisition or capital improvement to municipal assets and approved by the Library Board and Council.  At the later Council meeting a by-law was passed setting up a Reserve Fund to be know as “The Gravenhurst Public Library Endowment Reserve Fund”.
  2. 2009-2010 Municipal Insurance Liability Insurance Renewal – At the later Council meeting Council passed a resolution accepting the proposal from Jardine Lloyd Thompson for the period August 9, 2009 to August 9, 2010 in the amount $313,125 plus any applicable taxes.  Councillor Bryan Pilger asked if other quotes had been solicited – Treasurer, Ken Watson said he does not recommend it at this time but maybe in two years.
  3. Proposed Ticket Processing Fee for the Gravenhurst Opera House – as mentioned earlier this by-law was passed at the Council meeting.  The new ticketing system was approved at the July 7 meeting and this $4.75 processing fee will be charged to pay for the system and cover the ongoing per ticket charge of the vendor.
  4. Ward Review Update – Council, after extended debate, voted to approve the hiring of consultants to review the ward  boundaries and recommend an effective and equitable system of representation for the town.

The review will be conducted according to the principles the citizen representatives laid out in their deputation of July 24.  These are:  equity or parity, simplicity, accountability and accessibility, communities of interest, population growth, straightforward boundary lines and appropriate size of council.  The consultants' report is to provide options and make a recommendation to Council. 

The clerk presented 2 motions to council.  The first was to hire a consultant to conduct a review for a cost between 10 and 25 thousand dollars.  The second was to exempt her from the requirement to tender the service due to the tight time frames. 

Detail report.

The discussion opened with a brief summary of the situation and of the need for immediate action.    The time line proposed would have a public open house on October 3 to look at the options and provide comments.  The final report and council vote would be October 20.   

Councillors had the following discussion: 

Sandy Cairns:  she felt staff did not have the time to do this.  But thought spending 25 thousand was not right.

Mark Clairmont:    wants to deal with it internally.  A committee of council could look into options.  Wanted to table an amendment to just change the number of councillors in certain wards.  (reporter note: he voted against this change when it was proposed in a formal motion on April 7)    He perceives that this is about the public thinking that councillors are not doing a good job and this offends him.  He misses the whole point about equity and fairness.   He feels that there will not be an OMB challenge.  He verbally opposed the contract then changed his mind to support it and agreed to waive the tender process.

Paisley Donaldson:   Council still does not get the message.  The citizens have given clear direction.  It is time to review the wards.  Just get on with it.  Council has shown it cannot make a decision.  This has been in the strategic plan for 2 terms of council.  We have done this to ourselves and now must deal with it. 

Lou Guerriero:  Council has no choice under the municipal act.  Council must act.  People are not questioning the performance of individual councilors.

John Klinck:  feels the expert will make a fair assessment and he will come back with several options and Council will make the decision.    Citizens have executed their right and it will cost more to go to the OMB than to do this study.     He feels that there is a strong chance of an OMB challenge if council does not act.  People are still asking where they can sign the petition.  They want this change.

Bryan Pilger:  opposed to spending money.  Does not see the need for change.  Could have all councillors elected at large and no wards.

Terry Pilger:  reviewed the petition which says the citizens want the boundaries changed.  Council cannot be wishy washy about this..  If the public doesn't like what council does they can still go to the OMB.  He thinks council can do this work with staff support as it will not take much time.  At the vote stage he emphasized procedural matters such as the order of the vote and whether the chair has a vote.

Tracy Wilson:   wants to know why cost has gone up to 25 thousand. (reporter note:  this was the original estimate of the clerk at budget time) 

How they voted

Those who voted to let the contract:  for Cairns, Clairmont,  Donaldson, Guerriero, Klinck.  opposed were B. Pilger, T. Pilger and Wilson.

Those who voted to let the contract without tender:  for Cairns, Clairmont, Donaldson, Guerriero, Klinck.  opposed were B. Pilger, T. Pilger, Wilson. 

Comment:

The proposal to review and change the wards now goes back 2 council terms, 6 years.  Councillors have delayed on and refused to make change and turned down proposals for change.  They are now trying to introduce 2 red herrings into the discussion:  the first that this public request for change is an attack on their competence and second that the town's tender process must be adhered to.  Neither of these concerns address the petition request.  They put themselves in this position of tight time frames.  The public is concerned about fairness and equity not the individual performance of councilors.

Why are the Pilgers, Clairmont and Wilson  still opposed to change?  There was lot of huffing and puffing and heated debate and not much listening or opening of minds.  

We will keep you posted on the process as it continues. 

Remember the public open house October 3 

COUNCIL MEETING -

As well as the above noted by-laws and resolutions Council passed by-laws to appoint a Deputy Fire Chief (David Eidsness), to deem part of a registered plan not to be registered (Kenneth John Watson and Heather Louise Watson- Muskoka Beach Rd.), and to deem part of a registered plan not to be registered (Carolyn Ann Percy and Michael Howard Percy and Shirley and Douglas Coultis – Laidlaw Ave.)

Council was adjourned. 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Planning Council Notes  July 28, 2009 without prejudice 

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.  With the change to minimize the content of the town minutes these notes are the most complete record available to the public. To see background papers go to the town website.   

The meeting is known as planning council as matters before it primarily relate to land use planning matters.  

7 applications were heard.  All were approved, with little or no discussion.

The following is a brief summary of each. 

Comment:  only one comment is justified.  That pertains to the application from Ward on Kahshe Lake.  The KLRA requested that specific provisions prohibiting future decks and enclosing the approved addition be added.  There was no discussion of the request nor did Council do anything in response to this request.  This reporter does not understand this not listening to citizens input and requests. 

The applications

North Muldrew Lake               Phillips

Permission given for a 2d sleeping cabin and reduced setback to the lake.   

Severn River                  Clark

Permission given to enclose part of an existing deck thereby moving closer to the river. 

West Gravenhurst, Revel Street                Gateway Homes

Previous holding provisions for access to water and sewer and completion of an Environmental Impact Study will be removed 

Riley lake             Harris and Lappalainen

Prior town error in calculating the lot coverage will be corrected and increased coverage will be legal. 

Kahshe Lake                  Ward

They want to roof over a portion of their lakeside deck.  This means going closer to the lake than permitted by the by-law.  See comment above

Severn River                  Lazier

After they bought the property they discovered that decks and the muskoka room were poorly built and built without permits.  They now need approval for exceeding the lot coverage. 

Severn River                  Dear

This undersized lot has floodplain and setback issues.  They want to build a new home and siting had to be approved. 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Council Notes July 21, 2009                                     Without Prejudice

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items. These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability. With the change to minimize the content of the town minutes these notes are the most complete record available to the public. To see background papers go to the town website.

Council met in closed session before the Committee of the Whole to deal with a personnel matter and litigation or possible litigation. No resolutions came out of the closed session.

This meeting was held at the Severn Bridge Community Hall. Mayor Klinck introduced members of Council and Clerk, Candace Thwaites introduced staff members in attendance.

 

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Council notes July 15, 2009           without prejudice 

 Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this report relates what happened at the meeting; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA promotes greater access to information and accountability.  With the change to minimize the content of the town minutes these notes are the most complete record available to the public. To see background papers go to the town website.   

The committee of adjustment deals with minor variances.  The applications were straightforward and had no issues and all applications were speedily approved. 

Kahshe Lake              McCauley, et al. 

The application is to create 3 new lots from a large parcel and to grant rights of way to these lots and existing cottages.  One of the lots has deficient lot frontage. And 2 have too little area according to the OP.   The existing dwellings are legal non-conforming.    The new lots will be water access and have provision for parking and boat mooring.  The KLRA supported the application.   Approved 

Kahshe lake               Brody & McCauley

There is an encroachment by McCauley on Brody.  They are proposing to trade areas of land to right this problem.  2 severances and then deeming (attachments to the adjacent lot)  were   Approved 

Kahshe Lake              Witbeck

This large parcel is crossed by a private section of road.  The parcel will be severed into 2 large lots.  The road is used by others and the town gains title to the road. Approved 

Kahshe Lake              Newton

They want to create one new lot on Burnt Island.  The shoreline is high quality fish habitat, so an Aquatic Impact Assessment has been done.  Setbacks will be 30 metres, a natural buffer will be maintained, an envelope for shoreline structures, dock or boathouse 2 metres offshore, has been identified and construction mitigation measures must be employed.  With these conditions the new lot is  Approved

The KLRA supported the application. 

Muskoka Beach Road                      Schofield Holdings

A 44 metre frontage will be severed into 2 lots.  This is consistent with the urban intensification goal of the OP.   Approved 

Riley lake                               Phillips

He wants to add a deck to the front of the cottage, a replacement to a previous deck.  This will decrease the setback from 21 metres to 18 metres.            Approved 

Home Hardware Stores

They have a site plan for their new location at 169 and Musquash Road.  The need reduced set backs from Musquash Road,  the one concern was from Cyril Fry whose wife owns lots in close proximity.  She is worried that the new configuration could cause water to drain onto her property.  She was reassured by the planner and the franchisee that the site will be laid out to ensure drainage is away from that part of the property and towards the intersection with 169.                                      Approved 

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Council notes July 7, 2009           without prejudice 

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.  With the change to minimize the content of the town minutes these notes are the most complete record available to the public. To see background papers go to the town website.   

Overview:  The Council meeting was once again fairly routine and speedy.  The most interesting items were the planning report on the Commercial Core Zone. 

Veridian presented a cheque to K.P. Manson School for $3,000 to purchase a smart board and a projector.  This is the 4th such donation which is a condition of their purchase of Gravenhurst Hydro. 

The youth centre presented an activity report.  There appears to be a monthly event along with ongoing afterschool activities.  Attendance is growing and the centre is open over the summer. 

Wharf rental fees will be modified to allow for half day and hourly rentals. 

The in-water boat show does not need D dock, so it will be available for public boaters.  Rib fest will be the same weekend. 

The town is assuming parts of 2 private roads.   Part of Osprey Drive (leads to Pine Lake) for seasonal maintenance.  Part of Davis Drive in Severn Bridge for year round maintenance.  This latter is the result of a multiple lot severance on Davis which had as a condition the upgrading of the road and its subsequent assumption by the town.   Costs were not provided.

Discussion:  there was concern about whether the snowmobile trail is affected by the Osprey Drive maintenance.  Also who will notify the District re garbage pick-up?  Apparently it is up to the residents to contact the district. 

The Muskoka Road streetscape project update was provided.   The type and style of the lights and furniture as used in the south end will be continued up the street.

Discussion included:  when will the money from the G8 flow?   Will costs be within the 1.1 million grant?   Will the street lighting be used on Bay and Brock too?  Will there be an automated watering system for the hanging baskets?  Can we sell the old streetlights as members of the public have expressed interest? 

The project will be co-coordinated in stages with the District rebuild of muskoka Road. 

Commercial Core Zone.

A planning report was tabled showing the background to this designation and use and providing options for council to consider.   The options included status quo, eliminating multiple residential provisions, having a commercial residential mix via the zoning by-law, restricting the zone to commercial only, and changing the size of the area to reduce it.    When asked the EDO commented, but talked about the broader commercial zone.  He did not speak to the specifics of what has been learned about losing the old part of town as commercially viable.

Discussion:  T.Pilger – perhaps we need a 2d look at the planning here.  Where is the zoning by-law at? Response – completed by thanksgiving.   He like option 2 eliminating residential, and shrinking the commercial core zone to preserve the businesses.  We are putting a huge investment in the main street but are risking the viability of downtown. 

Klinck – we need to maintain the commercial viability of the main street.  If we loose commercial use we risk losing the main street.  But for the old Canadian Tire and IGA buildings perhaps residential is a good use.  Can we use the zoning by-law to place special provisions to keep the commercial?  Response yes it could be done and is appropriate.  

Clairmont – condos on the main street are not necessarily bad.  To act now is premature.

Guerriero – current situation is flexible, use zoning.

Comment:  this is the result of public and councillor concern about residential intruding into the commercial area of town and therefore diminishing the viability of the commercial core.    The approach taken was strictly a planning one.  The longstanding issue is one of the hollowing out of destination services, such as food, liquor, hardware, etc.  in the downtown and the resulting potential for loss of its commercial viability.  It is not a simple problem and we risk loosing the old town as the problem is being fragmented and treated solely as a planning problem. 

Shore road closure,  Cockburn Island

This island has been inhabited since 1927 with much of the island being shore road allowance and a small part being crown land and in the ownership of private individuals.  The owners will get to buy the OSRA once the crown land issue, ongoing since 2004, is resolved.  The fee will be <$2,000. 

The Opera House will get a new ticketing system costing approx. $10,000 as the existing one is obsolete and no longer supported.  An additional per ticket processing fee of $4.75 will be charged to pay for the system and cover the ongoing per ticket charge of the vendor.  The new system will allow for online sales and may result in lower box office staffing costs.

It is not known if this will increase attendance.   The marketing of the new service is not yet planned for. 

The G8 planning meetings are ongoing.

A new animal control officer was appointed. 

 

 Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Council notes June 23, 2009         without prejudice 

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.  With the change to minimize the content of the town minutes these notes are the most complete record available to the public. To see background papers go to the town website.  

Planning Council

The matters considered were for exemptions to the zoning by-law.  With the exception of a noise by-law exemption. 

Comment;  most of the applications were to permit buildings closer to the lake than the required 30 metres setback.  And consequently the shoreline development factors would also be exceeded.  This stems from the fact that old severances and plans of subdivision created lots which are much too small to meet today’s environmental knowledge and standards.   Hence, buildings are closer to the lake than is now recommended and sometimes the only possible siting is closer than the 30 metres, because of topography or lots being too shallow in depth so the buildings cannot go back from the water.  These exemptions will all have site plan control applied to preserve vegetation. 

Planning applications 

Clein              Muskoka Bay.

Want permission to build a bath house and storage shed to the side of the house.  The lot is shallow, the cottage is 10 metres from the water.  The shed will be 22.4 metres back.                                                                               Approved 

Beckberger              South Muldrew Lake

This very small vacant lot required a site evaluation report to indicate where a building envelope can be properly sited.  The terrain and size of the lot both create problems.  The new cottage will be 15 metres from the water and the septic system will be a tertiary type.                             Approved 

Cormier                     Riley Lake

Another small lot, 30 by 35 metres.  Mr.  Cormier built a small deck in front of an addition, the deck was not within the building permit.  He is also exceeding the permitted lot coverage and shoreline development factors.  The neighbours wrote in saying that the deck is OK and should be approved.          Approved 

Graham                     North Muldrew Lake

They put in a foundation in 1998 and at the time placed a sun room 1.2 metres closer to the water than the existing non-conforming cottage.   The request for final occupancy permit triggered the need for this application to regularize this situation.  Again topography contributes to the problem.            Approved 

Montgomery                        Lake Muskoka

His deck was destroyed by snow in 2008, prior to the 30 metre setback change to the zoning by-law.  The deck was set back 20 metres, the cottage 25 metres.  He now wants to replace the deck with and enclosed addition.  Approved 

Gibson                      Silver Lake

This lot was created before the 30 metre requirement and is too shallow to permit a proper setback.     The rear setback will be decreased from the by-law requirement.       The lake side setback will be between 20 and 30 metres.            Approved 

Two applications were not on lakes

Schuetter                  Southwood

He received permission to sever his large 60 hectare parcel of land into 7 lots.  At that time it was identified that part of the property is wetland.  This area is now being rezoned EP, Environmentally protected.                       Approved

Councillor Donaldson asked a good question as to how the protection of the EP area will be enforced. 

A road closure near Southwood.  The applicant owns 2 properties on either side of an unopened road allowance.    It will be closed and sold to the applicant. 

The Wednesday night water-ski show sponsored by Boston pizza will have a noise by-law exemption.  Someone opposed the exemption because of the noise from last year.  So staff will speak to the sponsor and monitor the situation.  

 

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Gravenhurst Council notes June 16, 2009                                              without prejudice 

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.  With the change to minimize the content of the town minutes these notes are the most complete record available to the public. To see background papers go to the town website.   

Overview:   There were many items on the agenda but not a lot of discussion except for the proposal to rescind the ACBS boat show exclusive use of the docks which brought out once again the blinkered and short term thinking that seems to dominate some councilors when it comes to the wharf development.   Whatever the commercial interests want is great.  The rest is to be ignored or seen as obstructive.  Think about the proposed docking fees.  If you visit the wharf you see the consequences.  

The Chamber of Commerce provided an update on its accomplishments: events such as the antique car show and the dockside festival and the Santa clause parade, member development and education, and promotion activities.

The only question was from Mark Clairmont who asked about the information Kiosk in Kinsmen Park.  He was reminded that last year council decided to not fund this visitor information service.  The issue is now being looked at by the EDO. 

Main Street Ontario application to ministry of agriculture food and rural affairs.  The principles and activities for the plan were briefly outlined.  The cost to the town will be up to 150 thousand over 3 years.There were no questions or comment by council.

The Economic Development Advisory committee was approved.  The advertisement for 9 members will be placed soon. 

The Recreation and Leisure Guide will be printed by for the town at no cost if the printer can have the advertising revenue.  The fact that those taxpayers who use the Washago post office do not receive the guide was pointed out to staff and this will be corrected. The lease on the sports shop at the arena will be extended to March 2010.  The assumption is that the construction for the new facility will begin at that time.A kayak trailer was approved for purchase.  The winning bidder was higher but will offset the higher quote by paying for advertising on the trailer and the kayaks.

Comment:  the town does not have a policy regarding advertising on town property or vehicles.  There is an ethical question about using taxpayer equipment for advertising.  This is even more egregious here as there are competing businesses which pay taxes to the town and the winning company is from out of town. Council asked no questionsThe town has asbestos in some buildings and an asbestos management program is needed.    Information and procedures have been developed.  Training is to come.An increase in cemetery fees was approved and enacted into by-law.

The Wharf, D Dock changes.  You will recall that the town approved 20 short term rental arrangements for D dock, adjacent to the Boat and Heritage Centre, on May 19.  This required several changes to by-laws for fees, parking, and permits.  The lease arrangement for the wharf marina management provides for a 20% commission for rentals and a 30% commission for enforcement.  The costs of the new arrangement to the town will be 5 thousand dollars for printing and signs.  

There was one question about whether the commission fee for enforcement will encourage abuse of the enforcement process.  The response indicated that staff believes that customer service considerations will override mere revenue concerns.  But this will be monitored.

ACBS boat show.  As part of the rentals of D docks the question arose as to what will happen for the 72 hours associated with the ACBS Boat show since in 2007 the ACBS was granted exclusive use of the docks for the show.   The proposal is to rescind this 2007 by-law.

Discussion:  the positions of those opposed to the rescinding by-law were: the mayor stressed that this is a premiere event for the town and feels that ACBS should retain exclusive use of all docks.  Donaldson felt the same. She referred to the contributions made by the ACBS to town non-profit organizations.  She also indicated that in the past when there were rented docks in the Bay the owners moved their boats to temporary docking for the show duration with no complaints.  Cairns supports Paisley and later pointed out that public boat traffic during the show deters the owners of these valuable antiques from participating.  T. Pilger felt that since this is a late notice the status quo should be left for this year.  Those in favour of rescinding:  Colhoun feels the D Docks are not needed for the show.  Guerriero sees this as just pushing off the problem to later on, proceed and see what happens, D dock is not even within the show site.

Ambivalent: Clairmont who agrees that this is late for this decision but wanted to know if D dock is needed by the ACBS.  The answer was yes; in 2007 would-be participants were turned down for lack of space.On the recorded vote the idea was rejected.  Those who wanted to rescind the ACBS by-law were Clairmont, Colhoun, Guerriero and Wilson.Those who wanted to keep the current exclusive use were Cairns, Donaldson, B. Pilger, T. Pilger and Klinck.

Comment   At the time of the initial ACBS request for exclusive use several points were made:  the safety and security of the site, the potential for damage to the very unique and expensive boats donated for show purposes by the owners, the requirement for adequate docking for the classic boats, the contribution of the ACBS to the town and the contribution of the show.  All of this seems to be forgotten in the expediency of the moment.   The ACBS has also in the past provided for alternate docking for attendees.  Is there any reason that moorings couldn’t be established by the town?    Is there a reason that D dock renters could be informed of the non-availability for the show duration – they could use their trailers for that timeframe.  

The approach to the problem reflects the blinkered and short term thinking that seems to dominate when it comes to the wharf development.   It also reflects the failure to think through decisions as to consequences and to plan in advance  to mitigate negative consequences of decisions.  The result is money and effort wasted and a constant game of catch-up.

The Boston Pizza Wednesday water ski show is continuing.  Ad noise exemption and waiver of the 800 dollar fee were approved.

Small short term events or demonstrations are permitted at the wharf and a policy for application process was approved.

Comment:  this is a solution in search of a problem.  More rules and controls and bureaucracy.  The cause of this procedure - a 13 year old asked if she can play her guitar at the wharf.  Staff get real.  Just say yes and tell her not to obstruct traffic or interfere with other events.   Rules and forms are not the answer.  The KISS principle should be applied to this municipality and its staff. 

The Committee of Adjustment is reappointed for another year.

The Ministry of Municipal Affairs wrote to the town stating that the setting of fees for building code inspections is the discretion of the town.  The limitation is that they cannot make a profit, but they can use a surplus in any one year to create a reserve fun for slow years.

Comment:the town runs an approx. 250 thousand deficit on this activity.  The mayor made the suggestion to ask the Province, even though he was told at the time of the department report that the town had this authority.  This was a ploy to defer any decision on raising fees.  Those people who profit from a service should pay the costs.  It is a very simple principle.  In this case the building inspection function should operate at closer to recovery of costs.  But the costs must also be kept under control.   

The final tax bill can now be issued.  Look forward to it.

An insert announcing the events associated with the designation and formal opening of the arch with a historic walk about and then joining the pirate fest and the fireworks at the wharf will be included. The lease with HISSO re the Boat and Heritage Centre is being modified because of the way MPAC classified the property. Civil marriage services will be expanded beyond the town hall and one Friday a month.  The mayor announced his first golf tournament.  Muskoka Bay golf course will be provided and the monies raised will go the education programs at the Boat and Heritage Centre.  Cost $225, date August 10th

By-laws to implement the above were passed   

Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association

Council Notes                        May 26 and June 2,  2009                  Without Prejudice 

Prepared by the Greater Gravenhurst Residents Association (GGRA) this is a report of what happened at the council meetings; comments designed to give context and identify repeated patterns are included for the relevant items.  These reports are prepared so that citizens can make informed contributions to the betterment of the town. The GGRA has been promoting greater access to information and accountability.  With the change to minimize the content of the town minutes these notes are the most complete record available to the public. To see background papers go to the town website.  . 

PLANNING COUNCIL MAY 26, 2009 

This meeting dealt with strictly routine matters.  Four zoning amendment applications and two shore road closures were dealt with.  The only two of any significance were:

Allen – near Southwood Rd.  The Allens applied to rezone their lands from Rural Zone to the Rural Zone subject to Special Provision 758, in order to exempt the property from the requirement that all properties have frontage on a street maintained by a public authority.  The lands are landlocked and thus no building permit can be issued for any structures.  A License of Occupation allows the applicants to occupy a portion of an unopened road allowance for the purpose of constructing a driveway on Town lands.The driveway is not publicly maintained and there is concern that is would not be suitable for emergency vehicles.  The Rural Zone permits a house, farm, bed and breakfast, garden centre and hunt camp.  Staff recommended that the by-law be amended to permit a storage shed only.  The owner was agreeable to this.  If he decides to build other structures in the future the road and driveway would have to brought up to town standards.  The by-law was passed with the suggested amendment.

Kempenfeldt Theatre Productions -Sam Cook Rd. (Three Mile Lake and Kashe Lake)- Application was submitted concurrently with a consent application which proposes to add land to another lot.  No new lots are proposed.  The consent application was considered at the Committee of Adjustment.  This zoning amendment would recognize the proposed minimum lot frontage of the retained lot.  The retained portion of the property is already developed with a house and a doc.  No further development is proposed at this time.  There are no structures on the parcel  that the land is to be added to.  One question that arose was whether the portage between the two lakes would be affected.  The portage between Three Mile and Kashe Lakes is protected under provincial statutes.  The by-law was passed at council, as were the other by-laws for zoning amends for Speicher (Housey's Rapids Rd) and Ferguson (Art Crisp Road) and the two shore road closures (McWhirter -Kashe Lake) and Grant/Seaton -Severn River) 

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AND COUNCIL JUNE 2, 2009 

Council met in closed session before the Committee of the Whole to deal with legal matters.   No resolutions came out of the closed session.  Councillors Sandy Cairns and Bryan Pilger were absent due to illness. 

COMMUNITY SERVICES

  1. YWCA Muskoka Women in Business Request for Use of the Youth Centre Building – The YWCA requested free use of the Youth Centre twice a week on Monday and Wednesday from 8:30am to 2:30pm starting October 14, 2009 and ending in March, 2010.  This program has run out of the Youth Centre in the past and has been very successful.  The resolution directing staff to enter into a Lease Agreement with the YWCA for Women in Business was carried (rent free and running until March 2010).

PUBLIC WORKS

  1. Increase in Cemetery Fees – Dave Saunders presented a report prepared by Tom McNeice, Cemetery Supervisor.  The increases are for single plot and cremation plot purchase prices as well as interment fees in Town Cemeteries.  These increases will bring the Town's charges on par with surrounding municipalities in Muskoka. The fees are increased every 3 years and will be brought back to Council on June 16 for approval.
  2. Fees and Charges By-law Update –Proposed fees for short term docking rental slips at Dock “D” at Muskoka Wharf were brought forward.  -$35.00 per day, $175.00 per week and $200 clamping fee.  This will also be brought forward at the June 16 Council meeting.
  3. Muskoka Wharf Board Meeting minutes April 21 and May 5,2009.  Mayor Klinck announced that the Marriott Hotel will have a grand opening on June 22 at 4pm.  Councillor Colhoun indicated there will be a “soft opening” on June 15.

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

  1. Designation of Gravenhurst Arch as a Heritage Resource – The Municipal Heritage Committee has recommended that the Arch be re-designated due to it strong historic significance to the Town.  Council passed a resolution authorizing the Municipal Heritage Committee to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the New Gravenhurst Arch.  If no objections are received they proceed to the designation and it is registered with the Ontario Heritage Trust.  Some comments and concerns were: as Muskoka Rd. is a District road does the District have to agree – no.  However they could still widen the road in the future if they so desire.  This is a new structure – why designate it – it is viewed as important to the community and that is how it fits under the Heritage Act.  What are the benefits vs. the downside of the designation – it is all positive – Council is re-enforcing the Arch's importance to the community.  The Arch cannot be taken down without public consultation and if a future Council decided to change the wording a public process would have to be followed.  The Heritage Committee wants to work with Council to make a public event of the opening.  COMMENT – It is exciting to see the new Arch up and we look forward to its completion and a BIG celebration marking its opening and dedication.
  2. Condominium Approval – Muskoka Bay Villa Corp – Block 2 – This is similar to the process for Block 4. Committee passed a resolution recommending to the District that Draft Approval of the proposed Draft Plan of Condominium subject to the developer entering into a Condominium Agreement with the Town of Gravenhurst.  There will be 39 units – five blocks of 6 units and one block of 4 units and one block of 5 units.  These units will have a traditional “Muskoka” look. 
  3. Music Muskoka Open House – staff republished the notice that was in the local newspapers.  An open house and information session is to be held June 13 at the Seniors Centre on First Street from 10:30 – 12:30. Representatives from Kendari will be in attendance and they are seeking feedback from the public about their proposal for an amphitheatre on their property on Gull Lake.
  4. Minutes of the The Gravenhurst Environmental Advisory Committee meeting of March 24, 2009
  5. Municipal Heritage Committee Minutes – March 10 and April 14.
  6. C2Zoning in Urban Core – This item was added to the agenda at the request of Councillors Terry Pilger and Paisley Donaldson.  Changes to the Official Plan and housekeeping changes to the zoning by-law mean  the C2 zone allows for residential habitation at street level in the Urban core.  This means we could have residential properties on the ground floor of building on the  main street if enough parking is available.  Councillor Terry Pilger wanted to clarify that is what council truly wanted.  Nick Popovich said the reason this was put in the OP to take care of some major properties on the Main Street – it could not go entirely residential as most properties are not wide enough nor do they have enough parking available.  After much heated debate it was decided that staff would bring back a report detailing what this means today and  what processes would be required for change.  Many councillors felt this had been dealt with during the process of developing the Official Plan and it can be discussed when by-law 94-54 is amended. while a few felt that there is merit in getting staff to bring a report to back to Committee.  COMMENT – this discussion  indicates that a VISION is needed for the Town. In talking with a member of the Official Plan Citizens Advisory Committee it was noted that allowing for residential habitation on the ground floor of buildings was recommended by the planners, there was not a lot of discussion and the implications were not fully explored.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

  1. Analysis of First Impressions Community Exchange Report Completed by the Town of the Blue Mountains – Gravenhurst partnered with the Town of the Blue Mountains to undertake a secret shopper exercise in each other's community.  The report outlines their impressions of Gravenhurst, its perceived strengths and some of what they considered was lacking.  The report makes for excellent reading and can be found on the Town of Gravenhurst Website under Agendas & Minutes – Committee of the Whole June 2 – Economic Development Committee.  They felt the most outstanding features of Gravenhurst were The vibrancy of its people and its vistas and the opportunities presented by a Town in transition from a 50's Ontario village to a thriving tourist attraction.  Five positive things about Gravenhurst:  1.  Marine museum; 2. Natural beauty of granite, lakes and trees; 3.  Access to waterfront; 4. The hidden gems (i.e. Parks); 5.  The clean, tidy streets and residences.  Three potential opportunities available:  1.  Finish development of the waterfront and connect to downtown; 2. Further develop parks and directional signage; 3.  Develop spaces between buildings downtown with support from private landowners.  The Five biggest obstacles/challenges facing the community:  1.  Enhanced directional signage; 2.  Consistent branding or community identification; 3.  Balancing the needs of residents, businesses, industry and tourism; 4.  Connecting the waterfront and the downtown; 5.  Ensuring the downtown stays vibrant, should an outlying commercial node become home to some downtown anchors (i.e. Canadian Tire, LCBO).
  2. Marketing Committee Minutes April 30, 2009.
  3. Visitor Centre Update – the town will provide support assistance to the Train Station for the summer.
  4. Main Street Ontario – This was brought forward at the May 19th Committee meeting through a deputation by Judy Coward of Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs.  The Ministry has responded favourably to the Town's Expression of Interest and the next step is to submit an application to the Main Street Ontario Program.  A report will be brought back to Council for their consideration with regard to proceed with the program. This program is modelled after the Main Street U.S.A. Program which has been in effect for 12 years and has proven to be very successful.  Funding is matched to 50% of eligible program costs up to a maximum of $150,000 over 3 years to help communities hire a full-time downtown revitalization coordinator to develop a downtown revitalization project, implement and monitor the action plan.  It was suggested by Mayor Klinck that perhaps some of the $1,200,000 G8 funding could be used as the municipality's portion.  The Economic Development Officer feels that this project fits ideally wit the G8 money.  The downtown revitalization coordinator would work with key community stakeholders and potential co-applicants (the BIA, Chamber of Commerce and Muskoka Wharf Association).  The BIA and Chamber of Commerce have provided letters of support and are prepared to be Co-Applicants. The resolution instructing staff to bring forward a report with regard to proceeding with the program was carried.  The next step is to bring the report to Council on June 16 and the application is to be submitted.
  5. Community Events Committee Minutes Feb. 11 and Mar. 31.
  6. CRTC Rulings – FM Station in South Muskoka – The application for a new FM Station was denied.

CORPORATE SERVICES

  1. Request for Noise Exemption – Gravenhurst High School Student Council – The GHS Student Council is planning a Fun Day on their sports field on Friday June 5 from 12 noon to 3:10pm and requested a noise exemption for the amplification of sound.  An ad was placed in the local newspaper and no written submissions were received.    A resolution granting the noise exemption was passed at the Council meeting.  GHS had to pay a $132.00 noise exemption request fee – this covers the cost to the Town to print the Notice  in the newspaper. Councillor Colhoun expressed his dismay that this fee had to be paid for an event on the school's own sports field and both Mayor Klinck and Chair Guerriero stated that Council will revisit the noise by-law.
  2. Municipal Risk Management and Insurance Requirements – Treasurer, Ken Watson, presented to Council regarding this topic. It is the intent of staff to bring in a policy that will address the insurance issues relating to the use of municipal facilities and parks.  It is a